Detection of early visual impairment in patients with epiretinal membrane

Yasuyo Nishi, Hajime Shinoda, Atsuro Uchida, Takashi Koto, Hiroshi Mochimaru, Norihiro Nagai, Kazuo Tsubota, Yoko Ozawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with epiretinal membrane sometimes complain of impaired central visual function, despite good best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), as measured by visual acuity (VA) charts. Here, we evaluate early epiretinal membrane-induced changes in central VA. Methods: Subjects were 72 eyes of 36 patients with epiretinal membrane in only one eye and a BCVA in each eye better than 1.0, as measured by conventional Landolt C chart, at the Retina Division Clinic of the Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University Hospital, between December 2010 and November 2011. The conventional Landolt VA, functional VA (FVA) and contrast VA measurements were taken after a general eye examination. For the FVA, Landolt optotypes were sequentially displayed every 2 seconds, which size was changed according to the correctness of the answer. To exclude the influence of other diseases, a standard Schirmer test was performed to diagnose dry eye, and corneal and lens densities were evaluated. Results: Average BCVA measured by Landolt C chart was not changed between affected and unaffected fellow eyes. However, the affected eyes showed a poorer FVA score (0.21 ± 0.12, affected; 0.09 ± 0.12, fellow) and visual maintenance ratio (VMR) (0.90 ± 0.04, affected; 0.94 ± 0.04, fellow), measured by the FVA system, and contrast VA score (0.35 ± 0.11, affected; 0.25 ± 0.14, fellow) than fellow eyes. The FVA and contrast VA values were correlated with the presence of epiretinal membrane, but not with the presence of dry eye, cataract and corneal densities. Conclusion: FVA and contrast VA results reflected early changes in central visual function caused by epiretinal membrane, which were not detected by conventional Landolt BCVA.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Ophthalmologica
Volume91
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Aug

Fingerprint

Epiretinal Membrane
Vision Disorders
Visual Acuity
Crystalline Lens
Ophthalmology
Cataract
Retina

Keywords

  • contrast visual acuity
  • epiretinal membrane
  • functional visual acuity
  • visual function measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Detection of early visual impairment in patients with epiretinal membrane. / Nishi, Yasuyo; Shinoda, Hajime; Uchida, Atsuro; Koto, Takashi; Mochimaru, Hiroshi; Nagai, Norihiro; Tsubota, Kazuo; Ozawa, Yoko.

In: Acta Ophthalmologica, Vol. 91, No. 5, 08.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{452f0ca6d8024d2b9bb6b37b2c640322,
title = "Detection of early visual impairment in patients with epiretinal membrane",
abstract = "Purpose: Patients with epiretinal membrane sometimes complain of impaired central visual function, despite good best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), as measured by visual acuity (VA) charts. Here, we evaluate early epiretinal membrane-induced changes in central VA. Methods: Subjects were 72 eyes of 36 patients with epiretinal membrane in only one eye and a BCVA in each eye better than 1.0, as measured by conventional Landolt C chart, at the Retina Division Clinic of the Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University Hospital, between December 2010 and November 2011. The conventional Landolt VA, functional VA (FVA) and contrast VA measurements were taken after a general eye examination. For the FVA, Landolt optotypes were sequentially displayed every 2 seconds, which size was changed according to the correctness of the answer. To exclude the influence of other diseases, a standard Schirmer test was performed to diagnose dry eye, and corneal and lens densities were evaluated. Results: Average BCVA measured by Landolt C chart was not changed between affected and unaffected fellow eyes. However, the affected eyes showed a poorer FVA score (0.21 ± 0.12, affected; 0.09 ± 0.12, fellow) and visual maintenance ratio (VMR) (0.90 ± 0.04, affected; 0.94 ± 0.04, fellow), measured by the FVA system, and contrast VA score (0.35 ± 0.11, affected; 0.25 ± 0.14, fellow) than fellow eyes. The FVA and contrast VA values were correlated with the presence of epiretinal membrane, but not with the presence of dry eye, cataract and corneal densities. Conclusion: FVA and contrast VA results reflected early changes in central visual function caused by epiretinal membrane, which were not detected by conventional Landolt BCVA.",
keywords = "contrast visual acuity, epiretinal membrane, functional visual acuity, visual function measurement",
author = "Yasuyo Nishi and Hajime Shinoda and Atsuro Uchida and Takashi Koto and Hiroshi Mochimaru and Norihiro Nagai and Kazuo Tsubota and Yoko Ozawa",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/aos.12060",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
journal = "Acta Ophthalmologica",
issn = "1755-375X",
publisher = "Copenhagen Scriptor",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of early visual impairment in patients with epiretinal membrane

AU - Nishi, Yasuyo

AU - Shinoda, Hajime

AU - Uchida, Atsuro

AU - Koto, Takashi

AU - Mochimaru, Hiroshi

AU - Nagai, Norihiro

AU - Tsubota, Kazuo

AU - Ozawa, Yoko

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Purpose: Patients with epiretinal membrane sometimes complain of impaired central visual function, despite good best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), as measured by visual acuity (VA) charts. Here, we evaluate early epiretinal membrane-induced changes in central VA. Methods: Subjects were 72 eyes of 36 patients with epiretinal membrane in only one eye and a BCVA in each eye better than 1.0, as measured by conventional Landolt C chart, at the Retina Division Clinic of the Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University Hospital, between December 2010 and November 2011. The conventional Landolt VA, functional VA (FVA) and contrast VA measurements were taken after a general eye examination. For the FVA, Landolt optotypes were sequentially displayed every 2 seconds, which size was changed according to the correctness of the answer. To exclude the influence of other diseases, a standard Schirmer test was performed to diagnose dry eye, and corneal and lens densities were evaluated. Results: Average BCVA measured by Landolt C chart was not changed between affected and unaffected fellow eyes. However, the affected eyes showed a poorer FVA score (0.21 ± 0.12, affected; 0.09 ± 0.12, fellow) and visual maintenance ratio (VMR) (0.90 ± 0.04, affected; 0.94 ± 0.04, fellow), measured by the FVA system, and contrast VA score (0.35 ± 0.11, affected; 0.25 ± 0.14, fellow) than fellow eyes. The FVA and contrast VA values were correlated with the presence of epiretinal membrane, but not with the presence of dry eye, cataract and corneal densities. Conclusion: FVA and contrast VA results reflected early changes in central visual function caused by epiretinal membrane, which were not detected by conventional Landolt BCVA.

AB - Purpose: Patients with epiretinal membrane sometimes complain of impaired central visual function, despite good best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), as measured by visual acuity (VA) charts. Here, we evaluate early epiretinal membrane-induced changes in central VA. Methods: Subjects were 72 eyes of 36 patients with epiretinal membrane in only one eye and a BCVA in each eye better than 1.0, as measured by conventional Landolt C chart, at the Retina Division Clinic of the Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University Hospital, between December 2010 and November 2011. The conventional Landolt VA, functional VA (FVA) and contrast VA measurements were taken after a general eye examination. For the FVA, Landolt optotypes were sequentially displayed every 2 seconds, which size was changed according to the correctness of the answer. To exclude the influence of other diseases, a standard Schirmer test was performed to diagnose dry eye, and corneal and lens densities were evaluated. Results: Average BCVA measured by Landolt C chart was not changed between affected and unaffected fellow eyes. However, the affected eyes showed a poorer FVA score (0.21 ± 0.12, affected; 0.09 ± 0.12, fellow) and visual maintenance ratio (VMR) (0.90 ± 0.04, affected; 0.94 ± 0.04, fellow), measured by the FVA system, and contrast VA score (0.35 ± 0.11, affected; 0.25 ± 0.14, fellow) than fellow eyes. The FVA and contrast VA values were correlated with the presence of epiretinal membrane, but not with the presence of dry eye, cataract and corneal densities. Conclusion: FVA and contrast VA results reflected early changes in central visual function caused by epiretinal membrane, which were not detected by conventional Landolt BCVA.

KW - contrast visual acuity

KW - epiretinal membrane

KW - functional visual acuity

KW - visual function measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880277031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880277031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/aos.12060

DO - 10.1111/aos.12060

M3 - Article

C2 - 23387556

AN - SCOPUS:84880277031

VL - 91

JO - Acta Ophthalmologica

JF - Acta Ophthalmologica

SN - 1755-375X

IS - 5

ER -