TY - JOUR
T1 - Determining the usefulness of Capsule Scoring of Ulcerative Colitis in predicting relapse of inactive ulcerative colitis
AU - Matsubayashi, Mao
AU - Kobayashi, Taku
AU - Okabayashi, Shinji
AU - Nakano, Masaru
AU - Sagami, Shintaro
AU - Ozaki, Ryo
AU - Kiyohara, Hiroki
AU - Morikubo, Hiromu
AU - Asonuma, Kunio
AU - Miyatani, Yusuke
AU - Maeda, Shin
AU - Hibi, Toshifumi
N1 - Funding Information:
T. K. has served as a speaker, a consultant, or an adviser in AbbVie, Ajinomoto Pharma, Asahi Kasei Medical, Astellas, Alfresa Pharma, Celltrion, Covidien, EA Pharma, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, JIMRO, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Thermo Scientific, and Zeria Pharmaceutical and received research funding from AbbVie, EA Pharma, Otsuka Holdings, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Mochida Pharmaceutical, EA Pharma, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Alfresa Pharma, Nippon Kayaku, Asahi Kasei Medical, and Sekisui Medical. S. S. has served as a speaker in AbbVie, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Zeria Pharmaceutical; received research funding from Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology; and was an endowed chair of AbbVie, JIMRO, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Mochida Pharmaceutical, and EA Pharma. H. M. has received research funding from Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology. H. K. has received research funding from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. M. S. received consulting fees from Medtronic, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Mochida Pharmaceutical, and Zeria Pharmaceutical. S. M. has served as a speaker from Eisai, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Olympus and received research funding from AbbVie, Pfizer, Otsuka Holdings, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Ajinomoto, Astellas, Eli Lilly, Daiichi‐Sankyo, Takeda Pharmacoceutical, and Chugai Pharmacoceutical. T. H. has served as a speaker, a consultant, or an adviser in Aspen Japan K.K, JIMRO, AbbVie, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Ferring, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Celltrion, EA Pharma, Eli Lilly, and Nichi‐Iko Pharmaceutical and has received research funding from AbbVie, IMRO, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, and Otsuka Holdings. The study is partly supported by Alfresa Pharma Co., Ltd. for measuring fecal calprotectin. This study was in part supported by a Grant‐in‐Aid for the Intractable Disease Project of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Other authors have no conflict of interests to disclose. Declaration of conflict of interest:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background and Aim: The usefulness of second-generation colon capsule endoscopy (CCE2) in ulcerative colitis (UC), especially in clinically inactive patients, has been reported. Capsule Scoring of Ulcerative Colitis (CSUC) was developed as a severity index for UC. We aimed to determine whether CSUC is useful for predicting relapse during clinical remission. Methods: Forty-one UC patients in clinical remission who underwent CCE2 were prospectively registered from April 2016 to August 2019. Patients' CSUC score was obtained; those with subsequent relapse were followed up retrospectively. The correlation of CSUC with white blood cell count, platelet count, albumin, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin and fecal lactoferrin levels, and fecal immunochemical test results was evaluated; their predictive values for future relapse were compared. Results: The correlations of CSUC with white blood cell, platelet, albumin, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, fecal immunochemical test, and fecal lactoferrin values were rs = 0.13, 0.27, −0.25, 0.15, 0.50, 0.43, and 0.50, respectively. CSUC was higher in 12 patients who relapsed within 1 year than in 29 patients who remained in clinical remission (2.83 ± 1.95 vs 0.72 ± 1.00, P < 0.01). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed that CSUC ≥ 1 was a predictor of relapse (area under the curve of 0.82, sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 58.6%) and maybe superior to fecal biomarkers. In the univariate analysis, patients with CSUC of 0 had a lower relapse rate than those with CSUC of ≧ 1 (P = 0.03, log–rank test). After analyzing patients who underwent CCE2 within 6 months after the successful induction treatment, results showed that those with CSUC of ≤ 1 remained in clinical remission for a year. Conclusion: CSUC predicts relapse within 1 year in UC patients in clinical remission, especially when used 6 months after induction treatment.
AB - Background and Aim: The usefulness of second-generation colon capsule endoscopy (CCE2) in ulcerative colitis (UC), especially in clinically inactive patients, has been reported. Capsule Scoring of Ulcerative Colitis (CSUC) was developed as a severity index for UC. We aimed to determine whether CSUC is useful for predicting relapse during clinical remission. Methods: Forty-one UC patients in clinical remission who underwent CCE2 were prospectively registered from April 2016 to August 2019. Patients' CSUC score was obtained; those with subsequent relapse were followed up retrospectively. The correlation of CSUC with white blood cell count, platelet count, albumin, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin and fecal lactoferrin levels, and fecal immunochemical test results was evaluated; their predictive values for future relapse were compared. Results: The correlations of CSUC with white blood cell, platelet, albumin, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, fecal immunochemical test, and fecal lactoferrin values were rs = 0.13, 0.27, −0.25, 0.15, 0.50, 0.43, and 0.50, respectively. CSUC was higher in 12 patients who relapsed within 1 year than in 29 patients who remained in clinical remission (2.83 ± 1.95 vs 0.72 ± 1.00, P < 0.01). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed that CSUC ≥ 1 was a predictor of relapse (area under the curve of 0.82, sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 58.6%) and maybe superior to fecal biomarkers. In the univariate analysis, patients with CSUC of 0 had a lower relapse rate than those with CSUC of ≧ 1 (P = 0.03, log–rank test). After analyzing patients who underwent CCE2 within 6 months after the successful induction treatment, results showed that those with CSUC of ≤ 1 remained in clinical remission for a year. Conclusion: CSUC predicts relapse within 1 year in UC patients in clinical remission, especially when used 6 months after induction treatment.
KW - Capsule endoscopy
KW - Colonoscopy
KW - Ulcerative colitis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090166518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090166518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jgh.15220
DO - 10.1111/jgh.15220
M3 - Article
C2 - 32805065
AN - SCOPUS:85090166518
SN - 0815-9319
VL - 36
SP - 943
EP - 950
JO - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
JF - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
IS - 4
ER -