Development of a checklist for evaluation of mental health activities at the workplace

Norito Kawakami, Akizumi Tsutsumi, Yuka Kobayashi, Kumi Hirokawa, Akihito Shimazu, Makiko Nagami, Noboru Iwata, Takashi Haratani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

"The Checklist for Evaluation of Mental Health Activities at the Workplace" was developed for workplace staff evaluating mental health activities in their own workplace. The validity and reliability of the checklist were examined and criteria for evaluation were developed for workplace/organization/companies with 50 or more employees in Japan. The checklist initially included 33 items covering seven major domains of occupational mental health, with a four-point response option, based on the Japanese Guideline for Worker Mental Health in the Workplace and a relevant literature review. A questionnaire was send to 60 members of the Occupational Mental Health Committee (OMHC) of the Japan Society for Occupational Health to ask their opinions on the checklist and on the minimum requirement for each item on the checklist; 30 (50%) responded. A random sample of 1,335 workplaces from a contractor list of workplaces for worker compensation insurance and a questionnaire was send to the personnel department to fill in the checklist; 412 (31.5%) responded and data from 335 of them with 50 or more employees were analyzed. Some OMHC members felt that one of the items (concerning the Total Health Promotion program) should be dropped; thus the checklist was revised to include 32 items, still covering the seven domains. Based on the workplace survey data, most domain scales showed internal consistency reliability at an acceptable level; explanatory factor analysis yielded a four-factor structure that was well concordant with the hypnotized seven-domain structure. Three levels of adequacy of mental health activities were set for each domain scale: "red" (inadequate), "yellow" (minimal), and "green" (adequate). One third of occupational health professionals from 49 workplaces rated the evaluation result based on the checklist as concordant with their view; 95% of them said the checklist would be useful in promoting occupational mental health activities. The study indicated that the checklist had reliability (based on internal consistency reliability) and content- and construct-validity (based on expert opinions, a factor-structure concordant with empirical data, and evaluation by workplace staff). The checklist seems useful in promoting occupational mental health activities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-32
Number of pages22
JournalSangyō eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Checklist
Workplace
Mental Health
Health
Occupational Health
Personnel
Japan
Committee Membership
Workers' Compensation
Expert Testimony
Insurance
Health Promotion
Factor analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical Factor Analysis
Contractors
Organizations
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Development of a checklist for evaluation of mental health activities at the workplace. / Kawakami, Norito; Tsutsumi, Akizumi; Kobayashi, Yuka; Hirokawa, Kumi; Shimazu, Akihito; Nagami, Makiko; Iwata, Noboru; Haratani, Takashi.

In: Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 11-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kawakami, Norito ; Tsutsumi, Akizumi ; Kobayashi, Yuka ; Hirokawa, Kumi ; Shimazu, Akihito ; Nagami, Makiko ; Iwata, Noboru ; Haratani, Takashi. / Development of a checklist for evaluation of mental health activities at the workplace. In: Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health. 2005 ; Vol. 47, No. 1. pp. 11-32.
@article{e0691d0d29d143f9a62d962d407ca5ae,
title = "Development of a checklist for evaluation of mental health activities at the workplace",
abstract = "{"}The Checklist for Evaluation of Mental Health Activities at the Workplace{"} was developed for workplace staff evaluating mental health activities in their own workplace. The validity and reliability of the checklist were examined and criteria for evaluation were developed for workplace/organization/companies with 50 or more employees in Japan. The checklist initially included 33 items covering seven major domains of occupational mental health, with a four-point response option, based on the Japanese Guideline for Worker Mental Health in the Workplace and a relevant literature review. A questionnaire was send to 60 members of the Occupational Mental Health Committee (OMHC) of the Japan Society for Occupational Health to ask their opinions on the checklist and on the minimum requirement for each item on the checklist; 30 (50{\%}) responded. A random sample of 1,335 workplaces from a contractor list of workplaces for worker compensation insurance and a questionnaire was send to the personnel department to fill in the checklist; 412 (31.5{\%}) responded and data from 335 of them with 50 or more employees were analyzed. Some OMHC members felt that one of the items (concerning the Total Health Promotion program) should be dropped; thus the checklist was revised to include 32 items, still covering the seven domains. Based on the workplace survey data, most domain scales showed internal consistency reliability at an acceptable level; explanatory factor analysis yielded a four-factor structure that was well concordant with the hypnotized seven-domain structure. Three levels of adequacy of mental health activities were set for each domain scale: {"}red{"} (inadequate), {"}yellow{"} (minimal), and {"}green{"} (adequate). One third of occupational health professionals from 49 workplaces rated the evaluation result based on the checklist as concordant with their view; 95{\%} of them said the checklist would be useful in promoting occupational mental health activities. The study indicated that the checklist had reliability (based on internal consistency reliability) and content- and construct-validity (based on expert opinions, a factor-structure concordant with empirical data, and evaluation by workplace staff). The checklist seems useful in promoting occupational mental health activities.",
author = "Norito Kawakami and Akizumi Tsutsumi and Yuka Kobayashi and Kumi Hirokawa and Akihito Shimazu and Makiko Nagami and Noboru Iwata and Takashi Haratani",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1539/sangyoeisei.47.11",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "11--32",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Health",
issn = "1341-9145",
publisher = "Japan Society for Occupational Health",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a checklist for evaluation of mental health activities at the workplace

AU - Kawakami, Norito

AU - Tsutsumi, Akizumi

AU - Kobayashi, Yuka

AU - Hirokawa, Kumi

AU - Shimazu, Akihito

AU - Nagami, Makiko

AU - Iwata, Noboru

AU - Haratani, Takashi

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - "The Checklist for Evaluation of Mental Health Activities at the Workplace" was developed for workplace staff evaluating mental health activities in their own workplace. The validity and reliability of the checklist were examined and criteria for evaluation were developed for workplace/organization/companies with 50 or more employees in Japan. The checklist initially included 33 items covering seven major domains of occupational mental health, with a four-point response option, based on the Japanese Guideline for Worker Mental Health in the Workplace and a relevant literature review. A questionnaire was send to 60 members of the Occupational Mental Health Committee (OMHC) of the Japan Society for Occupational Health to ask their opinions on the checklist and on the minimum requirement for each item on the checklist; 30 (50%) responded. A random sample of 1,335 workplaces from a contractor list of workplaces for worker compensation insurance and a questionnaire was send to the personnel department to fill in the checklist; 412 (31.5%) responded and data from 335 of them with 50 or more employees were analyzed. Some OMHC members felt that one of the items (concerning the Total Health Promotion program) should be dropped; thus the checklist was revised to include 32 items, still covering the seven domains. Based on the workplace survey data, most domain scales showed internal consistency reliability at an acceptable level; explanatory factor analysis yielded a four-factor structure that was well concordant with the hypnotized seven-domain structure. Three levels of adequacy of mental health activities were set for each domain scale: "red" (inadequate), "yellow" (minimal), and "green" (adequate). One third of occupational health professionals from 49 workplaces rated the evaluation result based on the checklist as concordant with their view; 95% of them said the checklist would be useful in promoting occupational mental health activities. The study indicated that the checklist had reliability (based on internal consistency reliability) and content- and construct-validity (based on expert opinions, a factor-structure concordant with empirical data, and evaluation by workplace staff). The checklist seems useful in promoting occupational mental health activities.

AB - "The Checklist for Evaluation of Mental Health Activities at the Workplace" was developed for workplace staff evaluating mental health activities in their own workplace. The validity and reliability of the checklist were examined and criteria for evaluation were developed for workplace/organization/companies with 50 or more employees in Japan. The checklist initially included 33 items covering seven major domains of occupational mental health, with a four-point response option, based on the Japanese Guideline for Worker Mental Health in the Workplace and a relevant literature review. A questionnaire was send to 60 members of the Occupational Mental Health Committee (OMHC) of the Japan Society for Occupational Health to ask their opinions on the checklist and on the minimum requirement for each item on the checklist; 30 (50%) responded. A random sample of 1,335 workplaces from a contractor list of workplaces for worker compensation insurance and a questionnaire was send to the personnel department to fill in the checklist; 412 (31.5%) responded and data from 335 of them with 50 or more employees were analyzed. Some OMHC members felt that one of the items (concerning the Total Health Promotion program) should be dropped; thus the checklist was revised to include 32 items, still covering the seven domains. Based on the workplace survey data, most domain scales showed internal consistency reliability at an acceptable level; explanatory factor analysis yielded a four-factor structure that was well concordant with the hypnotized seven-domain structure. Three levels of adequacy of mental health activities were set for each domain scale: "red" (inadequate), "yellow" (minimal), and "green" (adequate). One third of occupational health professionals from 49 workplaces rated the evaluation result based on the checklist as concordant with their view; 95% of them said the checklist would be useful in promoting occupational mental health activities. The study indicated that the checklist had reliability (based on internal consistency reliability) and content- and construct-validity (based on expert opinions, a factor-structure concordant with empirical data, and evaluation by workplace staff). The checklist seems useful in promoting occupational mental health activities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15744396781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15744396781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1539/sangyoeisei.47.11

DO - 10.1539/sangyoeisei.47.11

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 11

EP - 32

JO - Journal of Occupational Health

JF - Journal of Occupational Health

SN - 1341-9145

IS - 1

ER -