Development of a short questionnaire to measure an extended set of job demands, job resources, and positive health outcomes: The new brief job stress questionnaire

Akiomi Inoue, Norito Kawakami, Teruichi Shimomitsu, Akizumi Tsutsumi, Takashi Haratani, Toru Yoshikawa, Akihito Shimazu, Yuko Odagiri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the reliability and construct validity of a new version of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ), which measures an extended set of psychosocial factors at work by adding new scales/items to the current version of the BJSQ. Additional scales/ items were extensively collected from theoretical job stress models and similar questionnaires in several countries. Scales/items were field-tested and refined through a pilot internet survey. Finally, an 84-item questionnaire (141 items in total when combined with the current BJSQ) was developed. A nationally representative survey was administered to employees in Japan (n=1,633) to examine the reliability and construct validity. Most scales showed acceptable levels of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Principal component analyses showed that the first factor explained 50% or greater proportion of the variance in most scales. A scale factor analysis and a correlation analysis showed that these scales fit the theoretical expectations. These findings provided a piece of evidence that the New BJSQ scales are reliable and valid. Although more detailed content and construct validity should be examined in future study, the New BJSQ is a useful instrument to evaluate psychosocial work environment and positive mental health outcomes in the current workplace.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-189
Number of pages15
JournalIndustrial Health
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Resources
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Principal Component Analysis
Workplace
Internet
Statistical Factor Analysis
Mental Health
Japan
Psychology

Keywords

  • Job stress
  • Primary prevention
  • Psychosocial risk management
  • Reliability
  • Stress assessment
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Development of a short questionnaire to measure an extended set of job demands, job resources, and positive health outcomes : The new brief job stress questionnaire. / Inoue, Akiomi; Kawakami, Norito; Shimomitsu, Teruichi; Tsutsumi, Akizumi; Haratani, Takashi; Yoshikawa, Toru; Shimazu, Akihito; Odagiri, Yuko.

In: Industrial Health, Vol. 52, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 175-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Inoue, Akiomi ; Kawakami, Norito ; Shimomitsu, Teruichi ; Tsutsumi, Akizumi ; Haratani, Takashi ; Yoshikawa, Toru ; Shimazu, Akihito ; Odagiri, Yuko. / Development of a short questionnaire to measure an extended set of job demands, job resources, and positive health outcomes : The new brief job stress questionnaire. In: Industrial Health. 2014 ; Vol. 52, No. 3. pp. 175-189.
@article{595c86ecd24c4869b7e399fce74ac13c,
title = "Development of a short questionnaire to measure an extended set of job demands, job resources, and positive health outcomes: The new brief job stress questionnaire",
abstract = "This study aimed to investigate the reliability and construct validity of a new version of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ), which measures an extended set of psychosocial factors at work by adding new scales/items to the current version of the BJSQ. Additional scales/ items were extensively collected from theoretical job stress models and similar questionnaires in several countries. Scales/items were field-tested and refined through a pilot internet survey. Finally, an 84-item questionnaire (141 items in total when combined with the current BJSQ) was developed. A nationally representative survey was administered to employees in Japan (n=1,633) to examine the reliability and construct validity. Most scales showed acceptable levels of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Principal component analyses showed that the first factor explained 50{\%} or greater proportion of the variance in most scales. A scale factor analysis and a correlation analysis showed that these scales fit the theoretical expectations. These findings provided a piece of evidence that the New BJSQ scales are reliable and valid. Although more detailed content and construct validity should be examined in future study, the New BJSQ is a useful instrument to evaluate psychosocial work environment and positive mental health outcomes in the current workplace.",
keywords = "Job stress, Primary prevention, Psychosocial risk management, Reliability, Stress assessment, Validity",
author = "Akiomi Inoue and Norito Kawakami and Teruichi Shimomitsu and Akizumi Tsutsumi and Takashi Haratani and Toru Yoshikawa and Akihito Shimazu and Yuko Odagiri",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2486/indhealth.2013-0185",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "175--189",
journal = "Industrial Health",
issn = "0019-8366",
publisher = "National Institute of Industrial Health",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a short questionnaire to measure an extended set of job demands, job resources, and positive health outcomes

T2 - The new brief job stress questionnaire

AU - Inoue, Akiomi

AU - Kawakami, Norito

AU - Shimomitsu, Teruichi

AU - Tsutsumi, Akizumi

AU - Haratani, Takashi

AU - Yoshikawa, Toru

AU - Shimazu, Akihito

AU - Odagiri, Yuko

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - This study aimed to investigate the reliability and construct validity of a new version of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ), which measures an extended set of psychosocial factors at work by adding new scales/items to the current version of the BJSQ. Additional scales/ items were extensively collected from theoretical job stress models and similar questionnaires in several countries. Scales/items were field-tested and refined through a pilot internet survey. Finally, an 84-item questionnaire (141 items in total when combined with the current BJSQ) was developed. A nationally representative survey was administered to employees in Japan (n=1,633) to examine the reliability and construct validity. Most scales showed acceptable levels of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Principal component analyses showed that the first factor explained 50% or greater proportion of the variance in most scales. A scale factor analysis and a correlation analysis showed that these scales fit the theoretical expectations. These findings provided a piece of evidence that the New BJSQ scales are reliable and valid. Although more detailed content and construct validity should be examined in future study, the New BJSQ is a useful instrument to evaluate psychosocial work environment and positive mental health outcomes in the current workplace.

AB - This study aimed to investigate the reliability and construct validity of a new version of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ), which measures an extended set of psychosocial factors at work by adding new scales/items to the current version of the BJSQ. Additional scales/ items were extensively collected from theoretical job stress models and similar questionnaires in several countries. Scales/items were field-tested and refined through a pilot internet survey. Finally, an 84-item questionnaire (141 items in total when combined with the current BJSQ) was developed. A nationally representative survey was administered to employees in Japan (n=1,633) to examine the reliability and construct validity. Most scales showed acceptable levels of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Principal component analyses showed that the first factor explained 50% or greater proportion of the variance in most scales. A scale factor analysis and a correlation analysis showed that these scales fit the theoretical expectations. These findings provided a piece of evidence that the New BJSQ scales are reliable and valid. Although more detailed content and construct validity should be examined in future study, the New BJSQ is a useful instrument to evaluate psychosocial work environment and positive mental health outcomes in the current workplace.

KW - Job stress

KW - Primary prevention

KW - Psychosocial risk management

KW - Reliability

KW - Stress assessment

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904023162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904023162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2486/indhealth.2013-0185

DO - 10.2486/indhealth.2013-0185

M3 - Article

C2 - 24492763

AN - SCOPUS:84904023162

VL - 52

SP - 175

EP - 189

JO - Industrial Health

JF - Industrial Health

SN - 0019-8366

IS - 3

ER -