Development of a short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire

Akiomi Inoue, Norito Kawakami, Teruichi Shimomitsu, Akizumi Tsutsumi, Takashi Haratani, Toru Yoshikawa, Akihito Shimazu, Yuko Odagiri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability and validity of a short version of the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ) whose scales have one item selected from a standard version. Based on the results from an anonymous web-based questionnaire of occupational health staffs and personnel/labor staffs, we selected higher-priority scales from the standard version. After selecting one item with highest item-total correlation coefficient from each scale, a 23-item questionnaire was developed. A nationally representative survey was administered to Japanese employees (n=1,633) to examine test-retest reliability and validity. Most scales (or items) showed modest but adequate levels of test-retest reliability (r>0.50). Furthermore, job demands and job resources scales (or items) were associated with mental and physical stress reactions while job resources scales (or items) were also associated with positive outcomes. These findings provided a piece of evidence that the short version of the New BJSQ is reliable and valid.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-540
Number of pages6
JournalIndustrial Health
Volume52
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Occupational Health
Health Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Job stress
  • Primary prevention
  • Psychosocial risk management
  • Stress assessment
  • Test-retest reliability
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Inoue, A., Kawakami, N., Shimomitsu, T., Tsutsumi, A., Haratani, T., Yoshikawa, T., ... Odagiri, Y. (2014). Development of a short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire. Industrial Health, 52(6), 535-540. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0114

Development of a short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire. / Inoue, Akiomi; Kawakami, Norito; Shimomitsu, Teruichi; Tsutsumi, Akizumi; Haratani, Takashi; Yoshikawa, Toru; Shimazu, Akihito; Odagiri, Yuko.

In: Industrial Health, Vol. 52, No. 6, 01.01.2014, p. 535-540.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Inoue, A, Kawakami, N, Shimomitsu, T, Tsutsumi, A, Haratani, T, Yoshikawa, T, Shimazu, A & Odagiri, Y 2014, 'Development of a short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire', Industrial Health, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 535-540. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0114
Inoue A, Kawakami N, Shimomitsu T, Tsutsumi A, Haratani T, Yoshikawa T et al. Development of a short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire. Industrial Health. 2014 Jan 1;52(6):535-540. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0114
Inoue, Akiomi ; Kawakami, Norito ; Shimomitsu, Teruichi ; Tsutsumi, Akizumi ; Haratani, Takashi ; Yoshikawa, Toru ; Shimazu, Akihito ; Odagiri, Yuko. / Development of a short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire. In: Industrial Health. 2014 ; Vol. 52, No. 6. pp. 535-540.
@article{b6086455f0ec4fba966c0d6c76d6ec15,
title = "Development of a short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire",
abstract = "This study was aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability and validity of a short version of the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ) whose scales have one item selected from a standard version. Based on the results from an anonymous web-based questionnaire of occupational health staffs and personnel/labor staffs, we selected higher-priority scales from the standard version. After selecting one item with highest item-total correlation coefficient from each scale, a 23-item questionnaire was developed. A nationally representative survey was administered to Japanese employees (n=1,633) to examine test-retest reliability and validity. Most scales (or items) showed modest but adequate levels of test-retest reliability (r>0.50). Furthermore, job demands and job resources scales (or items) were associated with mental and physical stress reactions while job resources scales (or items) were also associated with positive outcomes. These findings provided a piece of evidence that the short version of the New BJSQ is reliable and valid.",
keywords = "Job stress, Primary prevention, Psychosocial risk management, Stress assessment, Test-retest reliability, Validity",
author = "Akiomi Inoue and Norito Kawakami and Teruichi Shimomitsu and Akizumi Tsutsumi and Takashi Haratani and Toru Yoshikawa and Akihito Shimazu and Yuko Odagiri",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2486/indhealth.2014-0114",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "535--540",
journal = "Industrial Health",
issn = "0019-8366",
publisher = "National Institute of Industrial Health",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire

AU - Inoue, Akiomi

AU - Kawakami, Norito

AU - Shimomitsu, Teruichi

AU - Tsutsumi, Akizumi

AU - Haratani, Takashi

AU - Yoshikawa, Toru

AU - Shimazu, Akihito

AU - Odagiri, Yuko

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - This study was aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability and validity of a short version of the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ) whose scales have one item selected from a standard version. Based on the results from an anonymous web-based questionnaire of occupational health staffs and personnel/labor staffs, we selected higher-priority scales from the standard version. After selecting one item with highest item-total correlation coefficient from each scale, a 23-item questionnaire was developed. A nationally representative survey was administered to Japanese employees (n=1,633) to examine test-retest reliability and validity. Most scales (or items) showed modest but adequate levels of test-retest reliability (r>0.50). Furthermore, job demands and job resources scales (or items) were associated with mental and physical stress reactions while job resources scales (or items) were also associated with positive outcomes. These findings provided a piece of evidence that the short version of the New BJSQ is reliable and valid.

AB - This study was aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability and validity of a short version of the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ) whose scales have one item selected from a standard version. Based on the results from an anonymous web-based questionnaire of occupational health staffs and personnel/labor staffs, we selected higher-priority scales from the standard version. After selecting one item with highest item-total correlation coefficient from each scale, a 23-item questionnaire was developed. A nationally representative survey was administered to Japanese employees (n=1,633) to examine test-retest reliability and validity. Most scales (or items) showed modest but adequate levels of test-retest reliability (r>0.50). Furthermore, job demands and job resources scales (or items) were associated with mental and physical stress reactions while job resources scales (or items) were also associated with positive outcomes. These findings provided a piece of evidence that the short version of the New BJSQ is reliable and valid.

KW - Job stress

KW - Primary prevention

KW - Psychosocial risk management

KW - Stress assessment

KW - Test-retest reliability

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919345767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919345767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2486/indhealth.2014-0114

DO - 10.2486/indhealth.2014-0114

M3 - Article

C2 - 24975108

AN - SCOPUS:84919345767

VL - 52

SP - 535

EP - 540

JO - Industrial Health

JF - Industrial Health

SN - 0019-8366

IS - 6

ER -