Development of an electronic medical record-based algorithm to identify patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Japan

Toshiki Fukasawa, Hayato Takahashi, Norin Kameyama, Risa Fukuda, Shihori Furuhata, Nanae Tanemura, Masayuki Amagai, Hisashi Urushihara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), severe drug reactions, are often misdiagnosed due to their rarity and lack of information on differential diagnosis. The objective of the study was to develop an electronic medical record (EMR)-based algorithm to identify patients with SJS/TEN for future application in database studies. From the EMRs of a university hospital, two dermatologists identified all 13 patients with SJS/TEN seen at the Department of Dermatology as the case group. Another 1472 patients who visited the Department of Dermatology were identified using the ICD-10 codes for diseases requiring differentiation from SJS/TEN. One hundred of these patients were then randomly sampled as controls. Based on clinical guidelines for SJS/TEN and the experience of the dermatologists, we tested 128 algorithms based on the use of ICD-10 codes, clinical courses for SJS/TEN, medical encounters for mucocutaneous lesions from SJS/TEN, and items to exclude paraneoplastic pemphigus. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of each algorithm were calculated, and the optimal algorithm was defined as that with high PPV and maximal sensitivity and specificity. One algorithm, consisting of a combination of clinical course for SJS/TEN, medical encounters for mucocutaneous lesions from SJS/TEN, and items to exclude paraneoplastic pemphigus, but not ICD-10 codes, showed a sensitivity of 76.9%, specificity of 99.0%, PPV of 40.5%, NPV of 99.8%, and DOR of 330.00. We developed a potentially optimized algorithm for identifying SJS/TEN based on clinical practice records. The almost perfect specificity of this algorithm will prevent bias in estimating relative risks of SJS/TEN in database studies. Considering the small sample size, this algorithm should be further tested in different settings.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0221130
JournalPloS one
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Electronic medical equipment
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
Electronic Health Records
Poisons
electronics
Japan
International Classification of Diseases
Dermatology
disease course
odds ratio
Pemphigus
Sensitivity and Specificity
Odds Ratio
relative risk
Databases
Diagnostic Errors
Sample Size
drugs
Differential Diagnosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Development of an electronic medical record-based algorithm to identify patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Japan. / Fukasawa, Toshiki; Takahashi, Hayato; Kameyama, Norin; Fukuda, Risa; Furuhata, Shihori; Tanemura, Nanae; Amagai, Masayuki; Urushihara, Hisashi.

In: PloS one, Vol. 14, No. 8, e0221130, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e792d6bcd2354990979eb59820868007,
title = "Development of an electronic medical record-based algorithm to identify patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Japan",
abstract = "Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), severe drug reactions, are often misdiagnosed due to their rarity and lack of information on differential diagnosis. The objective of the study was to develop an electronic medical record (EMR)-based algorithm to identify patients with SJS/TEN for future application in database studies. From the EMRs of a university hospital, two dermatologists identified all 13 patients with SJS/TEN seen at the Department of Dermatology as the case group. Another 1472 patients who visited the Department of Dermatology were identified using the ICD-10 codes for diseases requiring differentiation from SJS/TEN. One hundred of these patients were then randomly sampled as controls. Based on clinical guidelines for SJS/TEN and the experience of the dermatologists, we tested 128 algorithms based on the use of ICD-10 codes, clinical courses for SJS/TEN, medical encounters for mucocutaneous lesions from SJS/TEN, and items to exclude paraneoplastic pemphigus. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of each algorithm were calculated, and the optimal algorithm was defined as that with high PPV and maximal sensitivity and specificity. One algorithm, consisting of a combination of clinical course for SJS/TEN, medical encounters for mucocutaneous lesions from SJS/TEN, and items to exclude paraneoplastic pemphigus, but not ICD-10 codes, showed a sensitivity of 76.9{\%}, specificity of 99.0{\%}, PPV of 40.5{\%}, NPV of 99.8{\%}, and DOR of 330.00. We developed a potentially optimized algorithm for identifying SJS/TEN based on clinical practice records. The almost perfect specificity of this algorithm will prevent bias in estimating relative risks of SJS/TEN in database studies. Considering the small sample size, this algorithm should be further tested in different settings.",
author = "Toshiki Fukasawa and Hayato Takahashi and Norin Kameyama and Risa Fukuda and Shihori Furuhata and Nanae Tanemura and Masayuki Amagai and Hisashi Urushihara",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0221130",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of an electronic medical record-based algorithm to identify patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Japan

AU - Fukasawa, Toshiki

AU - Takahashi, Hayato

AU - Kameyama, Norin

AU - Fukuda, Risa

AU - Furuhata, Shihori

AU - Tanemura, Nanae

AU - Amagai, Masayuki

AU - Urushihara, Hisashi

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), severe drug reactions, are often misdiagnosed due to their rarity and lack of information on differential diagnosis. The objective of the study was to develop an electronic medical record (EMR)-based algorithm to identify patients with SJS/TEN for future application in database studies. From the EMRs of a university hospital, two dermatologists identified all 13 patients with SJS/TEN seen at the Department of Dermatology as the case group. Another 1472 patients who visited the Department of Dermatology were identified using the ICD-10 codes for diseases requiring differentiation from SJS/TEN. One hundred of these patients were then randomly sampled as controls. Based on clinical guidelines for SJS/TEN and the experience of the dermatologists, we tested 128 algorithms based on the use of ICD-10 codes, clinical courses for SJS/TEN, medical encounters for mucocutaneous lesions from SJS/TEN, and items to exclude paraneoplastic pemphigus. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of each algorithm were calculated, and the optimal algorithm was defined as that with high PPV and maximal sensitivity and specificity. One algorithm, consisting of a combination of clinical course for SJS/TEN, medical encounters for mucocutaneous lesions from SJS/TEN, and items to exclude paraneoplastic pemphigus, but not ICD-10 codes, showed a sensitivity of 76.9%, specificity of 99.0%, PPV of 40.5%, NPV of 99.8%, and DOR of 330.00. We developed a potentially optimized algorithm for identifying SJS/TEN based on clinical practice records. The almost perfect specificity of this algorithm will prevent bias in estimating relative risks of SJS/TEN in database studies. Considering the small sample size, this algorithm should be further tested in different settings.

AB - Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), severe drug reactions, are often misdiagnosed due to their rarity and lack of information on differential diagnosis. The objective of the study was to develop an electronic medical record (EMR)-based algorithm to identify patients with SJS/TEN for future application in database studies. From the EMRs of a university hospital, two dermatologists identified all 13 patients with SJS/TEN seen at the Department of Dermatology as the case group. Another 1472 patients who visited the Department of Dermatology were identified using the ICD-10 codes for diseases requiring differentiation from SJS/TEN. One hundred of these patients were then randomly sampled as controls. Based on clinical guidelines for SJS/TEN and the experience of the dermatologists, we tested 128 algorithms based on the use of ICD-10 codes, clinical courses for SJS/TEN, medical encounters for mucocutaneous lesions from SJS/TEN, and items to exclude paraneoplastic pemphigus. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of each algorithm were calculated, and the optimal algorithm was defined as that with high PPV and maximal sensitivity and specificity. One algorithm, consisting of a combination of clinical course for SJS/TEN, medical encounters for mucocutaneous lesions from SJS/TEN, and items to exclude paraneoplastic pemphigus, but not ICD-10 codes, showed a sensitivity of 76.9%, specificity of 99.0%, PPV of 40.5%, NPV of 99.8%, and DOR of 330.00. We developed a potentially optimized algorithm for identifying SJS/TEN based on clinical practice records. The almost perfect specificity of this algorithm will prevent bias in estimating relative risks of SJS/TEN in database studies. Considering the small sample size, this algorithm should be further tested in different settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070599243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070599243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0221130

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0221130

M3 - Article

C2 - 31408480

AN - SCOPUS:85070599243

VL - 14

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 8

M1 - e0221130

ER -