Development of the patient-based outcome instrument for the foot and ankle. Part 1

Project description and evaluation of the outcome instrument version 1

Hisateru Niki, Shinobu Tatsunami, Naoki Haraguchi, Takafumi Aoki, Ryuzo Okuda, Yasunori Suda, Masato Takao, Yasuhito Tanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot conducted a field survey using a novel foot and ankle outcome instrument. We report the development and evaluation of the Outcome Instrument version 1. Materials and methods A total of 108 potential questions were extracted from literature published in the interval between 1990 and 2006. Tentative subscales proposed were "Degree of Foot Pain,'' "Foot Pain-related,'' "Physical Functioning and Daily Living,'' "Social Functioning'' and "General Health and Well-being.'' After pre-testing in two different groups of patients, the Outcome Instrument version 1, which was composed of 46 items selected from the 108 questions, was administered to 256 patients (111 men and 145 women) with foot-and-ankle-related pathologic conditions and 243 healthy volunteers (125 men and 118 women). Cronbach's alpha coefficients were used for assessment of internal consistency of the instrument. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were utilized for evaluation of construct validity. Results Neither a ceiling nor floor effect was observed in the responses from the patients. Significant differences were found in the responses to all of the questions between the patients and volunteers (P<0.01 each). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each of the expected subscales indicated high reliability for most of the items and subscales. However, EFA extracted an additional subscale that should be interpreted as something related to shoe or shoefit. Further, both EFA and CFA indicated that "Degree of Foot Pain'' and "Foot Pain-related'' subscales were barely discernable with a factor correlation coefficient of 0.927. Conclusions The Committee partly revised the instrument, and the new subscales are as follows: "Foot Pain and Pain-related,'' "Physical Functioning and Daily Living,'' "Social Functioning,'' "General Health and Well-being'' and "Shoe-related.'' Evaluation of the Outcome Instrument version 2 will be reported in the following paper.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)536-555
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Science
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Sep

Fingerprint

Ankle
Foot
Statistical Factor Analysis
Pain
Shoes
Health
Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Development of the patient-based outcome instrument for the foot and ankle. Part 1 : Project description and evaluation of the outcome instrument version 1. / Niki, Hisateru; Tatsunami, Shinobu; Haraguchi, Naoki; Aoki, Takafumi; Okuda, Ryuzo; Suda, Yasunori; Takao, Masato; Tanaka, Yasuhito.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 16, No. 5, 09.2011, p. 536-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Niki, Hisateru ; Tatsunami, Shinobu ; Haraguchi, Naoki ; Aoki, Takafumi ; Okuda, Ryuzo ; Suda, Yasunori ; Takao, Masato ; Tanaka, Yasuhito. / Development of the patient-based outcome instrument for the foot and ankle. Part 1 : Project description and evaluation of the outcome instrument version 1. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2011 ; Vol. 16, No. 5. pp. 536-555.
@article{951681ab0a234f54b3369b84fbefb32f,
title = "Development of the patient-based outcome instrument for the foot and ankle. Part 1: Project description and evaluation of the outcome instrument version 1",
abstract = "Background The Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot conducted a field survey using a novel foot and ankle outcome instrument. We report the development and evaluation of the Outcome Instrument version 1. Materials and methods A total of 108 potential questions were extracted from literature published in the interval between 1990 and 2006. Tentative subscales proposed were {"}Degree of Foot Pain,'' {"}Foot Pain-related,'' {"}Physical Functioning and Daily Living,'' {"}Social Functioning'' and {"}General Health and Well-being.'' After pre-testing in two different groups of patients, the Outcome Instrument version 1, which was composed of 46 items selected from the 108 questions, was administered to 256 patients (111 men and 145 women) with foot-and-ankle-related pathologic conditions and 243 healthy volunteers (125 men and 118 women). Cronbach's alpha coefficients were used for assessment of internal consistency of the instrument. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were utilized for evaluation of construct validity. Results Neither a ceiling nor floor effect was observed in the responses from the patients. Significant differences were found in the responses to all of the questions between the patients and volunteers (P<0.01 each). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each of the expected subscales indicated high reliability for most of the items and subscales. However, EFA extracted an additional subscale that should be interpreted as something related to shoe or shoefit. Further, both EFA and CFA indicated that {"}Degree of Foot Pain'' and {"}Foot Pain-related'' subscales were barely discernable with a factor correlation coefficient of 0.927. Conclusions The Committee partly revised the instrument, and the new subscales are as follows: {"}Foot Pain and Pain-related,'' {"}Physical Functioning and Daily Living,'' {"}Social Functioning,'' {"}General Health and Well-being'' and {"}Shoe-related.'' Evaluation of the Outcome Instrument version 2 will be reported in the following paper.",
author = "Hisateru Niki and Shinobu Tatsunami and Naoki Haraguchi and Takafumi Aoki and Ryuzo Okuda and Yasunori Suda and Masato Takao and Yasuhito Tanaka",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00776-011-0130-7",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "536--555",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Science",
issn = "0949-2658",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of the patient-based outcome instrument for the foot and ankle. Part 1

T2 - Project description and evaluation of the outcome instrument version 1

AU - Niki, Hisateru

AU - Tatsunami, Shinobu

AU - Haraguchi, Naoki

AU - Aoki, Takafumi

AU - Okuda, Ryuzo

AU - Suda, Yasunori

AU - Takao, Masato

AU - Tanaka, Yasuhito

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Background The Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot conducted a field survey using a novel foot and ankle outcome instrument. We report the development and evaluation of the Outcome Instrument version 1. Materials and methods A total of 108 potential questions were extracted from literature published in the interval between 1990 and 2006. Tentative subscales proposed were "Degree of Foot Pain,'' "Foot Pain-related,'' "Physical Functioning and Daily Living,'' "Social Functioning'' and "General Health and Well-being.'' After pre-testing in two different groups of patients, the Outcome Instrument version 1, which was composed of 46 items selected from the 108 questions, was administered to 256 patients (111 men and 145 women) with foot-and-ankle-related pathologic conditions and 243 healthy volunteers (125 men and 118 women). Cronbach's alpha coefficients were used for assessment of internal consistency of the instrument. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were utilized for evaluation of construct validity. Results Neither a ceiling nor floor effect was observed in the responses from the patients. Significant differences were found in the responses to all of the questions between the patients and volunteers (P<0.01 each). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each of the expected subscales indicated high reliability for most of the items and subscales. However, EFA extracted an additional subscale that should be interpreted as something related to shoe or shoefit. Further, both EFA and CFA indicated that "Degree of Foot Pain'' and "Foot Pain-related'' subscales were barely discernable with a factor correlation coefficient of 0.927. Conclusions The Committee partly revised the instrument, and the new subscales are as follows: "Foot Pain and Pain-related,'' "Physical Functioning and Daily Living,'' "Social Functioning,'' "General Health and Well-being'' and "Shoe-related.'' Evaluation of the Outcome Instrument version 2 will be reported in the following paper.

AB - Background The Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot conducted a field survey using a novel foot and ankle outcome instrument. We report the development and evaluation of the Outcome Instrument version 1. Materials and methods A total of 108 potential questions were extracted from literature published in the interval between 1990 and 2006. Tentative subscales proposed were "Degree of Foot Pain,'' "Foot Pain-related,'' "Physical Functioning and Daily Living,'' "Social Functioning'' and "General Health and Well-being.'' After pre-testing in two different groups of patients, the Outcome Instrument version 1, which was composed of 46 items selected from the 108 questions, was administered to 256 patients (111 men and 145 women) with foot-and-ankle-related pathologic conditions and 243 healthy volunteers (125 men and 118 women). Cronbach's alpha coefficients were used for assessment of internal consistency of the instrument. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were utilized for evaluation of construct validity. Results Neither a ceiling nor floor effect was observed in the responses from the patients. Significant differences were found in the responses to all of the questions between the patients and volunteers (P<0.01 each). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each of the expected subscales indicated high reliability for most of the items and subscales. However, EFA extracted an additional subscale that should be interpreted as something related to shoe or shoefit. Further, both EFA and CFA indicated that "Degree of Foot Pain'' and "Foot Pain-related'' subscales were barely discernable with a factor correlation coefficient of 0.927. Conclusions The Committee partly revised the instrument, and the new subscales are as follows: "Foot Pain and Pain-related,'' "Physical Functioning and Daily Living,'' "Social Functioning,'' "General Health and Well-being'' and "Shoe-related.'' Evaluation of the Outcome Instrument version 2 will be reported in the following paper.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82955162988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82955162988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00776-011-0130-7

DO - 10.1007/s00776-011-0130-7

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 536

EP - 555

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science

SN - 0949-2658

IS - 5

ER -