Discrepancy in psychological attitudes toward living donor liver transplantation between recipients and donors

Kosuke Hayashi, Hiroyuki Uchida, Chie Takaoka, Yuka Izawa, Masahiro Shinoda, Hideaki Obara, Osamu Itano, Joichiro Shirahase, Minoru Tanabe, Yuukou Kitagawa, Masaru Mimura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Mutual understanding between recipients and donors is indispensable when living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is performed, which, however, has gained little attention and remains unaddressed in the literature. Methods. Fiftyseven pairs, a recipient (mean ± SD age at the operation, 48.3 ± 10.6 years; mean ± SD years after the operation, 6.2 ± 4.7 years) and his or her donor, who underwent LDLT completed a 13-item questionnaire on a 7-point Likert scale (1: strongly agree to 7: strongly disagree) that was designed to assess for their psychological attitudes toward transplantation. They were also asked to estimate their donor's or recipient's response to the questionnaire, respectively. Values of interest were compared between groups, using paired t tests. Following Bonferroni correction, a P value less than 0.0038 (0.05/13) was considered statistically significant. Results. Significant differences were observed between actually answered and estimated responses in 7 of the 13 items in the questionnaire for donors. For example, donors did not feel pressure to become a donor to the same degree as their recipients estimated (4.6 ± 1.9 vs 3.4 ± 1.8). In contrast, only 1 item showed a significant difference between actually answered and estimated responses in the questionnaire for recipients; recipients did not worry about the transplanted liver compared to their donors' estimation (3.1 ± 1.9 vs 2.1 ± 0.8). Conclusions. Recipients did not fully understand the donors' feelings toward LDLT, whereas donors almost correctly understood their recipients' attitudes. Our findings clearly revealed the gap in their mutual understanding and emphasize the need of psychological education to bridge the gap.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2551-2555
Number of pages5
JournalTransplantation
Volume99
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Living Donors
Liver Transplantation
Tissue Donors
Psychology
Emotions
Transplantation
Education
Pressure
Surveys and Questionnaires
Liver

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Discrepancy in psychological attitudes toward living donor liver transplantation between recipients and donors. / Hayashi, Kosuke; Uchida, Hiroyuki; Takaoka, Chie; Izawa, Yuka; Shinoda, Masahiro; Obara, Hideaki; Itano, Osamu; Shirahase, Joichiro; Tanabe, Minoru; Kitagawa, Yuukou; Mimura, Masaru.

In: Transplantation, Vol. 99, No. 12, 2015, p. 2551-2555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hayashi, Kosuke ; Uchida, Hiroyuki ; Takaoka, Chie ; Izawa, Yuka ; Shinoda, Masahiro ; Obara, Hideaki ; Itano, Osamu ; Shirahase, Joichiro ; Tanabe, Minoru ; Kitagawa, Yuukou ; Mimura, Masaru. / Discrepancy in psychological attitudes toward living donor liver transplantation between recipients and donors. In: Transplantation. 2015 ; Vol. 99, No. 12. pp. 2551-2555.
@article{587f2b54051648dcb6cf8d3d3742954a,
title = "Discrepancy in psychological attitudes toward living donor liver transplantation between recipients and donors",
abstract = "Background. Mutual understanding between recipients and donors is indispensable when living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is performed, which, however, has gained little attention and remains unaddressed in the literature. Methods. Fiftyseven pairs, a recipient (mean ± SD age at the operation, 48.3 ± 10.6 years; mean ± SD years after the operation, 6.2 ± 4.7 years) and his or her donor, who underwent LDLT completed a 13-item questionnaire on a 7-point Likert scale (1: strongly agree to 7: strongly disagree) that was designed to assess for their psychological attitudes toward transplantation. They were also asked to estimate their donor's or recipient's response to the questionnaire, respectively. Values of interest were compared between groups, using paired t tests. Following Bonferroni correction, a P value less than 0.0038 (0.05/13) was considered statistically significant. Results. Significant differences were observed between actually answered and estimated responses in 7 of the 13 items in the questionnaire for donors. For example, donors did not feel pressure to become a donor to the same degree as their recipients estimated (4.6 ± 1.9 vs 3.4 ± 1.8). In contrast, only 1 item showed a significant difference between actually answered and estimated responses in the questionnaire for recipients; recipients did not worry about the transplanted liver compared to their donors' estimation (3.1 ± 1.9 vs 2.1 ± 0.8). Conclusions. Recipients did not fully understand the donors' feelings toward LDLT, whereas donors almost correctly understood their recipients' attitudes. Our findings clearly revealed the gap in their mutual understanding and emphasize the need of psychological education to bridge the gap.",
author = "Kosuke Hayashi and Hiroyuki Uchida and Chie Takaoka and Yuka Izawa and Masahiro Shinoda and Hideaki Obara and Osamu Itano and Joichiro Shirahase and Minoru Tanabe and Yuukou Kitagawa and Masaru Mimura",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1097/TP.0000000000000800",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "2551--2555",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discrepancy in psychological attitudes toward living donor liver transplantation between recipients and donors

AU - Hayashi, Kosuke

AU - Uchida, Hiroyuki

AU - Takaoka, Chie

AU - Izawa, Yuka

AU - Shinoda, Masahiro

AU - Obara, Hideaki

AU - Itano, Osamu

AU - Shirahase, Joichiro

AU - Tanabe, Minoru

AU - Kitagawa, Yuukou

AU - Mimura, Masaru

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background. Mutual understanding between recipients and donors is indispensable when living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is performed, which, however, has gained little attention and remains unaddressed in the literature. Methods. Fiftyseven pairs, a recipient (mean ± SD age at the operation, 48.3 ± 10.6 years; mean ± SD years after the operation, 6.2 ± 4.7 years) and his or her donor, who underwent LDLT completed a 13-item questionnaire on a 7-point Likert scale (1: strongly agree to 7: strongly disagree) that was designed to assess for their psychological attitudes toward transplantation. They were also asked to estimate their donor's or recipient's response to the questionnaire, respectively. Values of interest were compared between groups, using paired t tests. Following Bonferroni correction, a P value less than 0.0038 (0.05/13) was considered statistically significant. Results. Significant differences were observed between actually answered and estimated responses in 7 of the 13 items in the questionnaire for donors. For example, donors did not feel pressure to become a donor to the same degree as their recipients estimated (4.6 ± 1.9 vs 3.4 ± 1.8). In contrast, only 1 item showed a significant difference between actually answered and estimated responses in the questionnaire for recipients; recipients did not worry about the transplanted liver compared to their donors' estimation (3.1 ± 1.9 vs 2.1 ± 0.8). Conclusions. Recipients did not fully understand the donors' feelings toward LDLT, whereas donors almost correctly understood their recipients' attitudes. Our findings clearly revealed the gap in their mutual understanding and emphasize the need of psychological education to bridge the gap.

AB - Background. Mutual understanding between recipients and donors is indispensable when living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is performed, which, however, has gained little attention and remains unaddressed in the literature. Methods. Fiftyseven pairs, a recipient (mean ± SD age at the operation, 48.3 ± 10.6 years; mean ± SD years after the operation, 6.2 ± 4.7 years) and his or her donor, who underwent LDLT completed a 13-item questionnaire on a 7-point Likert scale (1: strongly agree to 7: strongly disagree) that was designed to assess for their psychological attitudes toward transplantation. They were also asked to estimate their donor's or recipient's response to the questionnaire, respectively. Values of interest were compared between groups, using paired t tests. Following Bonferroni correction, a P value less than 0.0038 (0.05/13) was considered statistically significant. Results. Significant differences were observed between actually answered and estimated responses in 7 of the 13 items in the questionnaire for donors. For example, donors did not feel pressure to become a donor to the same degree as their recipients estimated (4.6 ± 1.9 vs 3.4 ± 1.8). In contrast, only 1 item showed a significant difference between actually answered and estimated responses in the questionnaire for recipients; recipients did not worry about the transplanted liver compared to their donors' estimation (3.1 ± 1.9 vs 2.1 ± 0.8). Conclusions. Recipients did not fully understand the donors' feelings toward LDLT, whereas donors almost correctly understood their recipients' attitudes. Our findings clearly revealed the gap in their mutual understanding and emphasize the need of psychological education to bridge the gap.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952306590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952306590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TP.0000000000000800

DO - 10.1097/TP.0000000000000800

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 2551

EP - 2555

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 12

ER -