Distance Between the Distal Rectal Pouch and Perineum in Neonates of Low-Birth Weight With Imperforate Anus

Takahiro Hosokawa, Mayumi Hosokawa, Yutaka Tanami, Hiroaki Takahashi, Shinya Hattori, Yumiko Sato, Yujiro Tanaka, Hiroshi Kawashima, Eiji Oguma, Yoshitake Yamada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was to evaluate the correlation between birth weight and the distance between distal rectal pouch and perineum (P-P distance) and to determine a cutoff value for P-P distance to diagnose low-type imperforate anus in neonates with low-birth weight (LBW). We included 15 neonates with LBW (mean weight, 2012 ± 470 g; range, 906-2452 g) and imperforate anus (surgically confirmed: 11 low type and 3/1 intermediate/high type), who underwent ultrasonography on the day after birth. Type of imperforate anus was defined based on the International Classification of Anorectal Anomalies. The P-P distances on ultrasonograms were measured. Pearson correlation coefficient test and receiver operating characteristic curve were used for statistical analyses. Among all 15 neonates, nonsignificant correlation was observed between the birth weight and P-P distance (r = 0.36; P = 0.18). Mean P-P distance was 9.0 ± 6.6 mm (range, 1.0-24.0 mm) in all neonates, 5.7 ± 2.8 mm (range, 1.0-11.0 mm) in the 11 neonates with low-type imperforate anus, and 18.3 ± 9.1 mm (range, 14.0-24.0 mm) in the 4 neonates with intermediate-/high-type imperforate anus. Using cutoff P-P distance of 12.5 mm, sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of low-type imperforate anus were 100% (11/11) and 100% (4/4), respectively. In conclusion, nonsignificant correlation was observed between P-P distance and birth weight, and cutoff P-P distance to diagnose low-type imperforate anus was 12.5 mm. Despite the very small sample size in our study, and only 4 neonates with intermediate-/high-type imperforate anus, these findings are important because surgical management whether transperineal anoplasty or diverting colostomy is decided based on the type of imperforate anus, and P-P distance to diagnose the type of imperforate anus was feasible even in neonates with LBW.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-22
Number of pages5
JournalUltrasound Quarterly
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Imperforate Anus
Perineum
Low Birth Weight Infant
Newborn Infant
Birth Weight
Colostomy
ROC Curve
Sample Size
Ultrasonography
Parturition

Keywords

  • anorectal malformation
  • imperforate anus
  • low-birth weight
  • neonate
  • ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Distance Between the Distal Rectal Pouch and Perineum in Neonates of Low-Birth Weight With Imperforate Anus. / Hosokawa, Takahiro; Hosokawa, Mayumi; Tanami, Yutaka; Takahashi, Hiroaki; Hattori, Shinya; Sato, Yumiko; Tanaka, Yujiro; Kawashima, Hiroshi; Oguma, Eiji; Yamada, Yoshitake.

In: Ultrasound Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 18-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hosokawa, T, Hosokawa, M, Tanami, Y, Takahashi, H, Hattori, S, Sato, Y, Tanaka, Y, Kawashima, H, Oguma, E & Yamada, Y 2018, 'Distance Between the Distal Rectal Pouch and Perineum in Neonates of Low-Birth Weight With Imperforate Anus', Ultrasound Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000329
Hosokawa, Takahiro ; Hosokawa, Mayumi ; Tanami, Yutaka ; Takahashi, Hiroaki ; Hattori, Shinya ; Sato, Yumiko ; Tanaka, Yujiro ; Kawashima, Hiroshi ; Oguma, Eiji ; Yamada, Yoshitake. / Distance Between the Distal Rectal Pouch and Perineum in Neonates of Low-Birth Weight With Imperforate Anus. In: Ultrasound Quarterly. 2018 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 18-22.
@article{b7e7ec20ca784eeaabb3977f18df94e6,
title = "Distance Between the Distal Rectal Pouch and Perineum in Neonates of Low-Birth Weight With Imperforate Anus",
abstract = "This study was to evaluate the correlation between birth weight and the distance between distal rectal pouch and perineum (P-P distance) and to determine a cutoff value for P-P distance to diagnose low-type imperforate anus in neonates with low-birth weight (LBW). We included 15 neonates with LBW (mean weight, 2012 ± 470 g; range, 906-2452 g) and imperforate anus (surgically confirmed: 11 low type and 3/1 intermediate/high type), who underwent ultrasonography on the day after birth. Type of imperforate anus was defined based on the International Classification of Anorectal Anomalies. The P-P distances on ultrasonograms were measured. Pearson correlation coefficient test and receiver operating characteristic curve were used for statistical analyses. Among all 15 neonates, nonsignificant correlation was observed between the birth weight and P-P distance (r = 0.36; P = 0.18). Mean P-P distance was 9.0 ± 6.6 mm (range, 1.0-24.0 mm) in all neonates, 5.7 ± 2.8 mm (range, 1.0-11.0 mm) in the 11 neonates with low-type imperforate anus, and 18.3 ± 9.1 mm (range, 14.0-24.0 mm) in the 4 neonates with intermediate-/high-type imperforate anus. Using cutoff P-P distance of 12.5 mm, sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of low-type imperforate anus were 100{\%} (11/11) and 100{\%} (4/4), respectively. In conclusion, nonsignificant correlation was observed between P-P distance and birth weight, and cutoff P-P distance to diagnose low-type imperforate anus was 12.5 mm. Despite the very small sample size in our study, and only 4 neonates with intermediate-/high-type imperforate anus, these findings are important because surgical management whether transperineal anoplasty or diverting colostomy is decided based on the type of imperforate anus, and P-P distance to diagnose the type of imperforate anus was feasible even in neonates with LBW.",
keywords = "anorectal malformation, imperforate anus, low-birth weight, neonate, ultrasonography",
author = "Takahiro Hosokawa and Mayumi Hosokawa and Yutaka Tanami and Hiroaki Takahashi and Shinya Hattori and Yumiko Sato and Yujiro Tanaka and Hiroshi Kawashima and Eiji Oguma and Yoshitake Yamada",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000329",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "18--22",
journal = "Ultrasound Quarterly",
issn = "0894-8771",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distance Between the Distal Rectal Pouch and Perineum in Neonates of Low-Birth Weight With Imperforate Anus

AU - Hosokawa, Takahiro

AU - Hosokawa, Mayumi

AU - Tanami, Yutaka

AU - Takahashi, Hiroaki

AU - Hattori, Shinya

AU - Sato, Yumiko

AU - Tanaka, Yujiro

AU - Kawashima, Hiroshi

AU - Oguma, Eiji

AU - Yamada, Yoshitake

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - This study was to evaluate the correlation between birth weight and the distance between distal rectal pouch and perineum (P-P distance) and to determine a cutoff value for P-P distance to diagnose low-type imperforate anus in neonates with low-birth weight (LBW). We included 15 neonates with LBW (mean weight, 2012 ± 470 g; range, 906-2452 g) and imperforate anus (surgically confirmed: 11 low type and 3/1 intermediate/high type), who underwent ultrasonography on the day after birth. Type of imperforate anus was defined based on the International Classification of Anorectal Anomalies. The P-P distances on ultrasonograms were measured. Pearson correlation coefficient test and receiver operating characteristic curve were used for statistical analyses. Among all 15 neonates, nonsignificant correlation was observed between the birth weight and P-P distance (r = 0.36; P = 0.18). Mean P-P distance was 9.0 ± 6.6 mm (range, 1.0-24.0 mm) in all neonates, 5.7 ± 2.8 mm (range, 1.0-11.0 mm) in the 11 neonates with low-type imperforate anus, and 18.3 ± 9.1 mm (range, 14.0-24.0 mm) in the 4 neonates with intermediate-/high-type imperforate anus. Using cutoff P-P distance of 12.5 mm, sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of low-type imperforate anus were 100% (11/11) and 100% (4/4), respectively. In conclusion, nonsignificant correlation was observed between P-P distance and birth weight, and cutoff P-P distance to diagnose low-type imperforate anus was 12.5 mm. Despite the very small sample size in our study, and only 4 neonates with intermediate-/high-type imperforate anus, these findings are important because surgical management whether transperineal anoplasty or diverting colostomy is decided based on the type of imperforate anus, and P-P distance to diagnose the type of imperforate anus was feasible even in neonates with LBW.

AB - This study was to evaluate the correlation between birth weight and the distance between distal rectal pouch and perineum (P-P distance) and to determine a cutoff value for P-P distance to diagnose low-type imperforate anus in neonates with low-birth weight (LBW). We included 15 neonates with LBW (mean weight, 2012 ± 470 g; range, 906-2452 g) and imperforate anus (surgically confirmed: 11 low type and 3/1 intermediate/high type), who underwent ultrasonography on the day after birth. Type of imperforate anus was defined based on the International Classification of Anorectal Anomalies. The P-P distances on ultrasonograms were measured. Pearson correlation coefficient test and receiver operating characteristic curve were used for statistical analyses. Among all 15 neonates, nonsignificant correlation was observed between the birth weight and P-P distance (r = 0.36; P = 0.18). Mean P-P distance was 9.0 ± 6.6 mm (range, 1.0-24.0 mm) in all neonates, 5.7 ± 2.8 mm (range, 1.0-11.0 mm) in the 11 neonates with low-type imperforate anus, and 18.3 ± 9.1 mm (range, 14.0-24.0 mm) in the 4 neonates with intermediate-/high-type imperforate anus. Using cutoff P-P distance of 12.5 mm, sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of low-type imperforate anus were 100% (11/11) and 100% (4/4), respectively. In conclusion, nonsignificant correlation was observed between P-P distance and birth weight, and cutoff P-P distance to diagnose low-type imperforate anus was 12.5 mm. Despite the very small sample size in our study, and only 4 neonates with intermediate-/high-type imperforate anus, these findings are important because surgical management whether transperineal anoplasty or diverting colostomy is decided based on the type of imperforate anus, and P-P distance to diagnose the type of imperforate anus was feasible even in neonates with LBW.

KW - anorectal malformation

KW - imperforate anus

KW - low-birth weight

KW - neonate

KW - ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043269999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043269999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000329

DO - 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000329

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 18

EP - 22

JO - Ultrasound Quarterly

JF - Ultrasound Quarterly

SN - 0894-8771

IS - 1

ER -