Do workaholism and work engagement predict employee well-being and performance in opposite directions?

Akihito Shimazu, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Kazumi Kubota, Norito Kawakami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the distinctiveness between workaholism and work engagement by examining their longitudinal relationships (measurement interval=7 months) with well-being and performance in a sample of 1,967 Japanese employees from various occupations. Based on a previous cross-sectional study (Shimazu & Schaufeli, 2009), we expected that workaholism predicts future unwell-being (i.e., high ill-health and low life satisfaction) and poor job performance, whereas work engagement predicts future well-being (i.e., low ill-health and high life satisfaction) and superior job performance. T1-T2 changes in ill-health, life satisfaction and job performance were measured as residual scores that were then included in the structural equation model. Results showed that workaholism and work engagement were weakly and positively related to each other. In addition, workaholism was related to an increase in ill-health and to a decrease in life satisfaction. In contrast, work engagement was related to a decrease in ill-health and to increases in both life satisfaction and job performance. These findings suggest that workaholism and work engagement are two different kinds of concepts that are oppositely related to well-being and performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)316-321
Number of pages6
JournalIndustrial Health
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Aug 20
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Structural Models
Occupations
Cross-Sectional Studies
Direction compound
Work Performance

Keywords

  • Job performance
  • Life satisfaction
  • Physical complaints
  • Psychological distress
  • Work engagement
  • Workahol-ism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Do workaholism and work engagement predict employee well-being and performance in opposite directions? / Shimazu, Akihito; Schaufeli, Wilmar B.; Kubota, Kazumi; Kawakami, Norito.

In: Industrial Health, Vol. 50, No. 4, 20.08.2012, p. 316-321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shimazu, Akihito ; Schaufeli, Wilmar B. ; Kubota, Kazumi ; Kawakami, Norito. / Do workaholism and work engagement predict employee well-being and performance in opposite directions?. In: Industrial Health. 2012 ; Vol. 50, No. 4. pp. 316-321.
@article{0b5d0d2776074f08a7a71e196ebfc002,
title = "Do workaholism and work engagement predict employee well-being and performance in opposite directions?",
abstract = "This study investigated the distinctiveness between workaholism and work engagement by examining their longitudinal relationships (measurement interval=7 months) with well-being and performance in a sample of 1,967 Japanese employees from various occupations. Based on a previous cross-sectional study (Shimazu & Schaufeli, 2009), we expected that workaholism predicts future unwell-being (i.e., high ill-health and low life satisfaction) and poor job performance, whereas work engagement predicts future well-being (i.e., low ill-health and high life satisfaction) and superior job performance. T1-T2 changes in ill-health, life satisfaction and job performance were measured as residual scores that were then included in the structural equation model. Results showed that workaholism and work engagement were weakly and positively related to each other. In addition, workaholism was related to an increase in ill-health and to a decrease in life satisfaction. In contrast, work engagement was related to a decrease in ill-health and to increases in both life satisfaction and job performance. These findings suggest that workaholism and work engagement are two different kinds of concepts that are oppositely related to well-being and performance.",
keywords = "Job performance, Life satisfaction, Physical complaints, Psychological distress, Work engagement, Workahol-ism",
author = "Akihito Shimazu and Schaufeli, {Wilmar B.} and Kazumi Kubota and Norito Kawakami",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "20",
doi = "10.2486/indhealth.MS1355",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "316--321",
journal = "Industrial Health",
issn = "0019-8366",
publisher = "National Institute of Industrial Health",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do workaholism and work engagement predict employee well-being and performance in opposite directions?

AU - Shimazu, Akihito

AU - Schaufeli, Wilmar B.

AU - Kubota, Kazumi

AU - Kawakami, Norito

PY - 2012/8/20

Y1 - 2012/8/20

N2 - This study investigated the distinctiveness between workaholism and work engagement by examining their longitudinal relationships (measurement interval=7 months) with well-being and performance in a sample of 1,967 Japanese employees from various occupations. Based on a previous cross-sectional study (Shimazu & Schaufeli, 2009), we expected that workaholism predicts future unwell-being (i.e., high ill-health and low life satisfaction) and poor job performance, whereas work engagement predicts future well-being (i.e., low ill-health and high life satisfaction) and superior job performance. T1-T2 changes in ill-health, life satisfaction and job performance were measured as residual scores that were then included in the structural equation model. Results showed that workaholism and work engagement were weakly and positively related to each other. In addition, workaholism was related to an increase in ill-health and to a decrease in life satisfaction. In contrast, work engagement was related to a decrease in ill-health and to increases in both life satisfaction and job performance. These findings suggest that workaholism and work engagement are two different kinds of concepts that are oppositely related to well-being and performance.

AB - This study investigated the distinctiveness between workaholism and work engagement by examining their longitudinal relationships (measurement interval=7 months) with well-being and performance in a sample of 1,967 Japanese employees from various occupations. Based on a previous cross-sectional study (Shimazu & Schaufeli, 2009), we expected that workaholism predicts future unwell-being (i.e., high ill-health and low life satisfaction) and poor job performance, whereas work engagement predicts future well-being (i.e., low ill-health and high life satisfaction) and superior job performance. T1-T2 changes in ill-health, life satisfaction and job performance were measured as residual scores that were then included in the structural equation model. Results showed that workaholism and work engagement were weakly and positively related to each other. In addition, workaholism was related to an increase in ill-health and to a decrease in life satisfaction. In contrast, work engagement was related to a decrease in ill-health and to increases in both life satisfaction and job performance. These findings suggest that workaholism and work engagement are two different kinds of concepts that are oppositely related to well-being and performance.

KW - Job performance

KW - Life satisfaction

KW - Physical complaints

KW - Psychological distress

KW - Work engagement

KW - Workahol-ism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865015289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865015289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2486/indhealth.MS1355

DO - 10.2486/indhealth.MS1355

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 316

EP - 321

JO - Industrial Health

JF - Industrial Health

SN - 0019-8366

IS - 4

ER -