Does a Prior Alliance with the Target Affect Acquisition Performance? The Dangers of a Honeymoon before Marriage

Pierre Xavier Meschi, Emmanuel Metais, Katsuhiko Shimizu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Drawing from organizational learning theory, extant literature argues that a pre-acquisition alliance between an acquirer and its target is usually expected to have a positive impact on subsequent acquisition performance. Yet, since alliances and acquisitions are partially dissimilar events, negative transfer effects can bias inter-partner learning and negatively affect acquisition performance. To fill this gap, our paper explores pre-acquisition alliance duration and examines its effects on acquisition outcomes. We argue that a pre-acquisition alliance can have either beneficial or detrimental effects on subsequent acquisition performance, depending on the duration of the pre-acquisition alliance. We examine our hypotheses using a (1988–2008) panel database covering acquisitions by French firms in the US. We show an inverted U-shaped relationship between the duration of a pre-acquisition alliance and the probability of acquisition failure. Our results also indicate that this non-monotonic relationship is partially moderated by the degree of partner commitment to the alliance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-444
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Management Review
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Marriage
Alliances
Inverted-U
Data base
Organizational learning
Learning theory

Keywords

  • acquisition
  • event history analysis
  • honeymoon period
  • negative transfer
  • organizational learning theory
  • pre-acquisition alliance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Does a Prior Alliance with the Target Affect Acquisition Performance? The Dangers of a Honeymoon before Marriage. / Meschi, Pierre Xavier; Metais, Emmanuel; Shimizu, Katsuhiko.

In: European Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 427-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{968cb5433e574b1f8adb92e29fb13706,
title = "Does a Prior Alliance with the Target Affect Acquisition Performance? The Dangers of a Honeymoon before Marriage",
abstract = "Drawing from organizational learning theory, extant literature argues that a pre-acquisition alliance between an acquirer and its target is usually expected to have a positive impact on subsequent acquisition performance. Yet, since alliances and acquisitions are partially dissimilar events, negative transfer effects can bias inter-partner learning and negatively affect acquisition performance. To fill this gap, our paper explores pre-acquisition alliance duration and examines its effects on acquisition outcomes. We argue that a pre-acquisition alliance can have either beneficial or detrimental effects on subsequent acquisition performance, depending on the duration of the pre-acquisition alliance. We examine our hypotheses using a (1988–2008) panel database covering acquisitions by French firms in the US. We show an inverted U-shaped relationship between the duration of a pre-acquisition alliance and the probability of acquisition failure. Our results also indicate that this non-monotonic relationship is partially moderated by the degree of partner commitment to the alliance.",
keywords = "acquisition, event history analysis, honeymoon period, negative transfer, organizational learning theory, pre-acquisition alliance",
author = "Meschi, {Pierre Xavier} and Emmanuel Metais and Katsuhiko Shimizu",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/emre.12127",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "427--444",
journal = "European Management Review",
issn = "1740-4754",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does a Prior Alliance with the Target Affect Acquisition Performance? The Dangers of a Honeymoon before Marriage

AU - Meschi, Pierre Xavier

AU - Metais, Emmanuel

AU - Shimizu, Katsuhiko

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Drawing from organizational learning theory, extant literature argues that a pre-acquisition alliance between an acquirer and its target is usually expected to have a positive impact on subsequent acquisition performance. Yet, since alliances and acquisitions are partially dissimilar events, negative transfer effects can bias inter-partner learning and negatively affect acquisition performance. To fill this gap, our paper explores pre-acquisition alliance duration and examines its effects on acquisition outcomes. We argue that a pre-acquisition alliance can have either beneficial or detrimental effects on subsequent acquisition performance, depending on the duration of the pre-acquisition alliance. We examine our hypotheses using a (1988–2008) panel database covering acquisitions by French firms in the US. We show an inverted U-shaped relationship between the duration of a pre-acquisition alliance and the probability of acquisition failure. Our results also indicate that this non-monotonic relationship is partially moderated by the degree of partner commitment to the alliance.

AB - Drawing from organizational learning theory, extant literature argues that a pre-acquisition alliance between an acquirer and its target is usually expected to have a positive impact on subsequent acquisition performance. Yet, since alliances and acquisitions are partially dissimilar events, negative transfer effects can bias inter-partner learning and negatively affect acquisition performance. To fill this gap, our paper explores pre-acquisition alliance duration and examines its effects on acquisition outcomes. We argue that a pre-acquisition alliance can have either beneficial or detrimental effects on subsequent acquisition performance, depending on the duration of the pre-acquisition alliance. We examine our hypotheses using a (1988–2008) panel database covering acquisitions by French firms in the US. We show an inverted U-shaped relationship between the duration of a pre-acquisition alliance and the probability of acquisition failure. Our results also indicate that this non-monotonic relationship is partially moderated by the degree of partner commitment to the alliance.

KW - acquisition

KW - event history analysis

KW - honeymoon period

KW - negative transfer

KW - organizational learning theory

KW - pre-acquisition alliance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057041075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057041075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/emre.12127

DO - 10.1111/emre.12127

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85057041075

VL - 15

SP - 427

EP - 444

JO - European Management Review

JF - European Management Review

SN - 1740-4754

IS - 3

ER -