Does removal of out-of-pocket costs for cervical and breast cancer screening work? A quasi-experimental study to evaluate the impact on attendance, attendance inequality and average cost per uptake of a Japanese government intervention

Takahiro Tabuchi, Takahiro Hoshino, Tomio Nakayama, Yuri Ito, Akiko Ioka, Isao Miyashiro, Hideaki Tsukuma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reducing out-of-pocket costs is known to improve mammography attendance, but an evidence gap remains concerning Pap smear testing. The Japanese government implemented a politically determined intervention to remove out-of-pocket costs for Pap smear tests and mammography attendance, costing US$148 million, in 2009. It targeted women when they reached the first year of a 5-year age group (i.e., 20, 25, 30 years) with the aim of reducing attendance inequality. Our objective is to evaluate the intervention in terms of uptake and average cost per uptake for cancer screening attendance and to assess socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening attendance pre- and postintervention. A quasi-experimental study utilizing national repeated cross sections, observed pre- and postintervention, which compared intervention and comparison groups by the Difference-in-Differences method, was conducted. Outcome measures were uptake of cancer screening attendance resulting from the intervention with average cost per uptake and broad inequality indicators for cancer screening attendance according to socioeconomic inequality. In total, 34,043 age-eligible, noninstitutionalized women were analyzed. Uptake among the overall population was 13.9% point in the age- and income-adjusted model for Pap smear and 9.8% point for mammography, with an average cost of US$139 per uptake. The intervention increased inequality indicators in Pap smear attendance (more than +100%) but decreased inequality in mammography attendance (ranging from -12.9 to -74.1%) within the intervention group. In conclusion, removing out-of-pocket costs improves female cancer screening uptake in Japan but may not be cost-saving. Although cost removal reduces inequalities in attendance for mammography, it appears to increase inequalities in Pap smear attendance. What's new? Out-of-pocket costs may be a barrier to cancer screening, though their removal in some countries has met with mixed results. Here, analysis of uptake, government expenditure, and socioeconomic inequalities associated with a cost-free breast and cervical cancer screening program introduced in Japan in 2009 indicates that while attendance increased for both types of screening, overall spending for the program was considerable. Furthermore, while inequalities in attendance decreased for breast cancer screening, they increased for cervical cancer screening.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)972-983
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Cancer
Volume133
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Aug 15
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Expenditures
Early Detection of Cancer
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Papanicolaou Test
Breast Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mammography
Japan
Non-Randomized Controlled Trials
Age Groups
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Japan
  • mammography
  • Pap smear
  • removing out-of-pocket costs
  • socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening attendance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Does removal of out-of-pocket costs for cervical and breast cancer screening work? A quasi-experimental study to evaluate the impact on attendance, attendance inequality and average cost per uptake of a Japanese government intervention. / Tabuchi, Takahiro; Hoshino, Takahiro; Nakayama, Tomio; Ito, Yuri; Ioka, Akiko; Miyashiro, Isao; Tsukuma, Hideaki.

In: International Journal of Cancer, Vol. 133, No. 4, 15.08.2013, p. 972-983.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8306e9a4724546ac971406bea1999a88,
title = "Does removal of out-of-pocket costs for cervical and breast cancer screening work? A quasi-experimental study to evaluate the impact on attendance, attendance inequality and average cost per uptake of a Japanese government intervention",
abstract = "Reducing out-of-pocket costs is known to improve mammography attendance, but an evidence gap remains concerning Pap smear testing. The Japanese government implemented a politically determined intervention to remove out-of-pocket costs for Pap smear tests and mammography attendance, costing US$148 million, in 2009. It targeted women when they reached the first year of a 5-year age group (i.e., 20, 25, 30 years) with the aim of reducing attendance inequality. Our objective is to evaluate the intervention in terms of uptake and average cost per uptake for cancer screening attendance and to assess socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening attendance pre- and postintervention. A quasi-experimental study utilizing national repeated cross sections, observed pre- and postintervention, which compared intervention and comparison groups by the Difference-in-Differences method, was conducted. Outcome measures were uptake of cancer screening attendance resulting from the intervention with average cost per uptake and broad inequality indicators for cancer screening attendance according to socioeconomic inequality. In total, 34,043 age-eligible, noninstitutionalized women were analyzed. Uptake among the overall population was 13.9{\%} point in the age- and income-adjusted model for Pap smear and 9.8{\%} point for mammography, with an average cost of US$139 per uptake. The intervention increased inequality indicators in Pap smear attendance (more than +100{\%}) but decreased inequality in mammography attendance (ranging from -12.9 to -74.1{\%}) within the intervention group. In conclusion, removing out-of-pocket costs improves female cancer screening uptake in Japan but may not be cost-saving. Although cost removal reduces inequalities in attendance for mammography, it appears to increase inequalities in Pap smear attendance. What's new? Out-of-pocket costs may be a barrier to cancer screening, though their removal in some countries has met with mixed results. Here, analysis of uptake, government expenditure, and socioeconomic inequalities associated with a cost-free breast and cervical cancer screening program introduced in Japan in 2009 indicates that while attendance increased for both types of screening, overall spending for the program was considerable. Furthermore, while inequalities in attendance decreased for breast cancer screening, they increased for cervical cancer screening.",
keywords = "Japan, mammography, Pap smear, removing out-of-pocket costs, socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening attendance",
author = "Takahiro Tabuchi and Takahiro Hoshino and Tomio Nakayama and Yuri Ito and Akiko Ioka and Isao Miyashiro and Hideaki Tsukuma",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/ijc.28095",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "972--983",
journal = "International Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0020-7136",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does removal of out-of-pocket costs for cervical and breast cancer screening work? A quasi-experimental study to evaluate the impact on attendance, attendance inequality and average cost per uptake of a Japanese government intervention

AU - Tabuchi, Takahiro

AU - Hoshino, Takahiro

AU - Nakayama, Tomio

AU - Ito, Yuri

AU - Ioka, Akiko

AU - Miyashiro, Isao

AU - Tsukuma, Hideaki

PY - 2013/8/15

Y1 - 2013/8/15

N2 - Reducing out-of-pocket costs is known to improve mammography attendance, but an evidence gap remains concerning Pap smear testing. The Japanese government implemented a politically determined intervention to remove out-of-pocket costs for Pap smear tests and mammography attendance, costing US$148 million, in 2009. It targeted women when they reached the first year of a 5-year age group (i.e., 20, 25, 30 years) with the aim of reducing attendance inequality. Our objective is to evaluate the intervention in terms of uptake and average cost per uptake for cancer screening attendance and to assess socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening attendance pre- and postintervention. A quasi-experimental study utilizing national repeated cross sections, observed pre- and postintervention, which compared intervention and comparison groups by the Difference-in-Differences method, was conducted. Outcome measures were uptake of cancer screening attendance resulting from the intervention with average cost per uptake and broad inequality indicators for cancer screening attendance according to socioeconomic inequality. In total, 34,043 age-eligible, noninstitutionalized women were analyzed. Uptake among the overall population was 13.9% point in the age- and income-adjusted model for Pap smear and 9.8% point for mammography, with an average cost of US$139 per uptake. The intervention increased inequality indicators in Pap smear attendance (more than +100%) but decreased inequality in mammography attendance (ranging from -12.9 to -74.1%) within the intervention group. In conclusion, removing out-of-pocket costs improves female cancer screening uptake in Japan but may not be cost-saving. Although cost removal reduces inequalities in attendance for mammography, it appears to increase inequalities in Pap smear attendance. What's new? Out-of-pocket costs may be a barrier to cancer screening, though their removal in some countries has met with mixed results. Here, analysis of uptake, government expenditure, and socioeconomic inequalities associated with a cost-free breast and cervical cancer screening program introduced in Japan in 2009 indicates that while attendance increased for both types of screening, overall spending for the program was considerable. Furthermore, while inequalities in attendance decreased for breast cancer screening, they increased for cervical cancer screening.

AB - Reducing out-of-pocket costs is known to improve mammography attendance, but an evidence gap remains concerning Pap smear testing. The Japanese government implemented a politically determined intervention to remove out-of-pocket costs for Pap smear tests and mammography attendance, costing US$148 million, in 2009. It targeted women when they reached the first year of a 5-year age group (i.e., 20, 25, 30 years) with the aim of reducing attendance inequality. Our objective is to evaluate the intervention in terms of uptake and average cost per uptake for cancer screening attendance and to assess socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening attendance pre- and postintervention. A quasi-experimental study utilizing national repeated cross sections, observed pre- and postintervention, which compared intervention and comparison groups by the Difference-in-Differences method, was conducted. Outcome measures were uptake of cancer screening attendance resulting from the intervention with average cost per uptake and broad inequality indicators for cancer screening attendance according to socioeconomic inequality. In total, 34,043 age-eligible, noninstitutionalized women were analyzed. Uptake among the overall population was 13.9% point in the age- and income-adjusted model for Pap smear and 9.8% point for mammography, with an average cost of US$139 per uptake. The intervention increased inequality indicators in Pap smear attendance (more than +100%) but decreased inequality in mammography attendance (ranging from -12.9 to -74.1%) within the intervention group. In conclusion, removing out-of-pocket costs improves female cancer screening uptake in Japan but may not be cost-saving. Although cost removal reduces inequalities in attendance for mammography, it appears to increase inequalities in Pap smear attendance. What's new? Out-of-pocket costs may be a barrier to cancer screening, though their removal in some countries has met with mixed results. Here, analysis of uptake, government expenditure, and socioeconomic inequalities associated with a cost-free breast and cervical cancer screening program introduced in Japan in 2009 indicates that while attendance increased for both types of screening, overall spending for the program was considerable. Furthermore, while inequalities in attendance decreased for breast cancer screening, they increased for cervical cancer screening.

KW - Japan

KW - mammography

KW - Pap smear

KW - removing out-of-pocket costs

KW - socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening attendance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878869157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878869157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ijc.28095

DO - 10.1002/ijc.28095

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 972

EP - 983

JO - International Journal of Cancer

JF - International Journal of Cancer

SN - 0020-7136

IS - 4

ER -