Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy

Toshio Ohashi, Tetsuo Momma, Shoji Yamashita, Kunimitsu Kanai, Yusuke Watanabe, Takashi Hanada, Naoyuki Shigematsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Post-implant dosimetric assessment is essential for optimal care of patients receiving prostate brachytherapy. In most institutions, post-implant computed tomography (CT) is performed in the supine position. This study aimed to assess variability in dosimetric parameters with postural changes during acquisition of post-implant CT scans. Material and methods: In total, 85 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-three patients underwent seed implantation alone, and the remaining 32 received a combination of seed implantation and external beam radiotherapy. For post-implant analyses, CT scans were obtained in two patient positions, supine and prone. To evaluate differences in dosimetric parameters associated with postural change, the dosimetric data obtained in the supine position were defined as the standard. Results: The median prostate volume was 22.4 ml in the supine and 22.5 ml in the prone position (p = 0.51). The median prostate D90 was 120.1% in the supine and 120.3% in the prone position, not significantly different. The mean prostate V100 was 97.1% in the supine and 97.0% in the prone position, again not significantly different. Median rectal V100 in supine and prone positions were 0.42 ml and 0.33 ml, respectively (p < 0.01). Rectal D2cc was also significantly decreased in the prone as compared with the supine position (median, 59.1% vs. 63.6%; p < 0.01). A larger post-implant prostate volume was associated with decreased rectal doses in the prone position. Conclusions: Though there were no significant differences among prostate D90 assessments according to postural changes, our results suggest that post-implant rectal doses decreased in the prone position.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-126
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Prone Position
Supine Position
Brachytherapy
Prostate
Tomography
Seeds
Patient Care
Radiotherapy

Keywords

  • Brachytherapy
  • Position
  • Post-implant
  • Prone
  • Prostate cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy. / Ohashi, Toshio; Momma, Tetsuo; Yamashita, Shoji; Kanai, Kunimitsu; Watanabe, Yusuke; Hanada, Takashi; Shigematsu, Naoyuki.

In: Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2013, p. 122-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{24aaeb2f98434135b6751d4dbb7c4724,
title = "Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy",
abstract = "Purpose: Post-implant dosimetric assessment is essential for optimal care of patients receiving prostate brachytherapy. In most institutions, post-implant computed tomography (CT) is performed in the supine position. This study aimed to assess variability in dosimetric parameters with postural changes during acquisition of post-implant CT scans. Material and methods: In total, 85 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-three patients underwent seed implantation alone, and the remaining 32 received a combination of seed implantation and external beam radiotherapy. For post-implant analyses, CT scans were obtained in two patient positions, supine and prone. To evaluate differences in dosimetric parameters associated with postural change, the dosimetric data obtained in the supine position were defined as the standard. Results: The median prostate volume was 22.4 ml in the supine and 22.5 ml in the prone position (p = 0.51). The median prostate D90 was 120.1{\%} in the supine and 120.3{\%} in the prone position, not significantly different. The mean prostate V100 was 97.1{\%} in the supine and 97.0{\%} in the prone position, again not significantly different. Median rectal V100 in supine and prone positions were 0.42 ml and 0.33 ml, respectively (p < 0.01). Rectal D2cc was also significantly decreased in the prone as compared with the supine position (median, 59.1{\%} vs. 63.6{\%}; p < 0.01). A larger post-implant prostate volume was associated with decreased rectal doses in the prone position. Conclusions: Though there were no significant differences among prostate D90 assessments according to postural changes, our results suggest that post-implant rectal doses decreased in the prone position.",
keywords = "Brachytherapy, Position, Post-implant, Prone, Prostate cancer",
author = "Toshio Ohashi and Tetsuo Momma and Shoji Yamashita and Kunimitsu Kanai and Yusuke Watanabe and Takashi Hanada and Naoyuki Shigematsu",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.5114/jcb.2013.37695",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "122--126",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy",
issn = "1689-832X",
publisher = "Termedia Publishing House Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy

AU - Ohashi, Toshio

AU - Momma, Tetsuo

AU - Yamashita, Shoji

AU - Kanai, Kunimitsu

AU - Watanabe, Yusuke

AU - Hanada, Takashi

AU - Shigematsu, Naoyuki

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose: Post-implant dosimetric assessment is essential for optimal care of patients receiving prostate brachytherapy. In most institutions, post-implant computed tomography (CT) is performed in the supine position. This study aimed to assess variability in dosimetric parameters with postural changes during acquisition of post-implant CT scans. Material and methods: In total, 85 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-three patients underwent seed implantation alone, and the remaining 32 received a combination of seed implantation and external beam radiotherapy. For post-implant analyses, CT scans were obtained in two patient positions, supine and prone. To evaluate differences in dosimetric parameters associated with postural change, the dosimetric data obtained in the supine position were defined as the standard. Results: The median prostate volume was 22.4 ml in the supine and 22.5 ml in the prone position (p = 0.51). The median prostate D90 was 120.1% in the supine and 120.3% in the prone position, not significantly different. The mean prostate V100 was 97.1% in the supine and 97.0% in the prone position, again not significantly different. Median rectal V100 in supine and prone positions were 0.42 ml and 0.33 ml, respectively (p < 0.01). Rectal D2cc was also significantly decreased in the prone as compared with the supine position (median, 59.1% vs. 63.6%; p < 0.01). A larger post-implant prostate volume was associated with decreased rectal doses in the prone position. Conclusions: Though there were no significant differences among prostate D90 assessments according to postural changes, our results suggest that post-implant rectal doses decreased in the prone position.

AB - Purpose: Post-implant dosimetric assessment is essential for optimal care of patients receiving prostate brachytherapy. In most institutions, post-implant computed tomography (CT) is performed in the supine position. This study aimed to assess variability in dosimetric parameters with postural changes during acquisition of post-implant CT scans. Material and methods: In total, 85 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-three patients underwent seed implantation alone, and the remaining 32 received a combination of seed implantation and external beam radiotherapy. For post-implant analyses, CT scans were obtained in two patient positions, supine and prone. To evaluate differences in dosimetric parameters associated with postural change, the dosimetric data obtained in the supine position were defined as the standard. Results: The median prostate volume was 22.4 ml in the supine and 22.5 ml in the prone position (p = 0.51). The median prostate D90 was 120.1% in the supine and 120.3% in the prone position, not significantly different. The mean prostate V100 was 97.1% in the supine and 97.0% in the prone position, again not significantly different. Median rectal V100 in supine and prone positions were 0.42 ml and 0.33 ml, respectively (p < 0.01). Rectal D2cc was also significantly decreased in the prone as compared with the supine position (median, 59.1% vs. 63.6%; p < 0.01). A larger post-implant prostate volume was associated with decreased rectal doses in the prone position. Conclusions: Though there were no significant differences among prostate D90 assessments according to postural changes, our results suggest that post-implant rectal doses decreased in the prone position.

KW - Brachytherapy

KW - Position

KW - Post-implant

KW - Prone

KW - Prostate cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885823227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885823227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5114/jcb.2013.37695

DO - 10.5114/jcb.2013.37695

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 122

EP - 126

JO - Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy

JF - Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy

SN - 1689-832X

IS - 3

ER -