Dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation improves performance in a tactile spatial discrimination task

Shuhei Fujimoto, Tomofumi Yamaguchi, Yohei Otaka, Kunitsugu Kondo, Satoshi Tanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) could improve performance in a tactile spatial discriminative task, compared with uni-hemisphere or sham tDCS. Methods: Nine healthy adults participated in this double-blind, sham-controlled, and cross-over design study. The performance in a grating orientation task (GOT) in the right index finger was evaluated before, during, immediately after and 30. min after the dual-hemisphere, uni-hemisphere (1. mA, 20. min), or sham tDCS (1. mA, 30. s) over S1. In the dual-hemisphere and sham conditions, anodal tDCS was applied over the left S1, and cathodal tDCS was applied over the right S1. In the uni-hemisphere condition, anodal tDCS was applied over the left S1, and cathodal tDCS was applied over the contralateral supraorbital front. Results: The percentage of correct responses on the GOT during dual-hemisphere tDCS was significantly higher than that in the uni-hemisphere or sham tDCS conditions when the grating width was set to 0.75. mm (all p<. 0.05). Conclusions: Dual-hemisphere tDCS over S1 improved performance in a tactile spatial discrimination task in healthy volunteers. Significance: Dual-hemisphere tDCS may be a useful strategy to improve sensory function in patients with sensory dysfunctions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1669-1674
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume125
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Touch
Cross-Over Studies
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Somatosensory Cortex
Fingers
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Cortical plasticity
  • Inter-hemispheric inhibition (IHI)
  • Somatosensory cortex
  • Tactile
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Sensory Systems
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation improves performance in a tactile spatial discrimination task. / Fujimoto, Shuhei; Yamaguchi, Tomofumi; Otaka, Yohei; Kondo, Kunitsugu; Tanaka, Satoshi.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 125, No. 8, 2014, p. 1669-1674.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fujimoto, Shuhei ; Yamaguchi, Tomofumi ; Otaka, Yohei ; Kondo, Kunitsugu ; Tanaka, Satoshi. / Dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation improves performance in a tactile spatial discrimination task. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. 2014 ; Vol. 125, No. 8. pp. 1669-1674.
@article{f73fcf995a224f429258e436b6966027,
title = "Dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation improves performance in a tactile spatial discrimination task",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) could improve performance in a tactile spatial discriminative task, compared with uni-hemisphere or sham tDCS. Methods: Nine healthy adults participated in this double-blind, sham-controlled, and cross-over design study. The performance in a grating orientation task (GOT) in the right index finger was evaluated before, during, immediately after and 30. min after the dual-hemisphere, uni-hemisphere (1. mA, 20. min), or sham tDCS (1. mA, 30. s) over S1. In the dual-hemisphere and sham conditions, anodal tDCS was applied over the left S1, and cathodal tDCS was applied over the right S1. In the uni-hemisphere condition, anodal tDCS was applied over the left S1, and cathodal tDCS was applied over the contralateral supraorbital front. Results: The percentage of correct responses on the GOT during dual-hemisphere tDCS was significantly higher than that in the uni-hemisphere or sham tDCS conditions when the grating width was set to 0.75. mm (all p<. 0.05). Conclusions: Dual-hemisphere tDCS over S1 improved performance in a tactile spatial discrimination task in healthy volunteers. Significance: Dual-hemisphere tDCS may be a useful strategy to improve sensory function in patients with sensory dysfunctions.",
keywords = "Cortical plasticity, Inter-hemispheric inhibition (IHI), Somatosensory cortex, Tactile, Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)",
author = "Shuhei Fujimoto and Tomofumi Yamaguchi and Yohei Otaka and Kunitsugu Kondo and Satoshi Tanaka",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinph.2013.12.100",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
pages = "1669--1674",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation improves performance in a tactile spatial discrimination task

AU - Fujimoto, Shuhei

AU - Yamaguchi, Tomofumi

AU - Otaka, Yohei

AU - Kondo, Kunitsugu

AU - Tanaka, Satoshi

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) could improve performance in a tactile spatial discriminative task, compared with uni-hemisphere or sham tDCS. Methods: Nine healthy adults participated in this double-blind, sham-controlled, and cross-over design study. The performance in a grating orientation task (GOT) in the right index finger was evaluated before, during, immediately after and 30. min after the dual-hemisphere, uni-hemisphere (1. mA, 20. min), or sham tDCS (1. mA, 30. s) over S1. In the dual-hemisphere and sham conditions, anodal tDCS was applied over the left S1, and cathodal tDCS was applied over the right S1. In the uni-hemisphere condition, anodal tDCS was applied over the left S1, and cathodal tDCS was applied over the contralateral supraorbital front. Results: The percentage of correct responses on the GOT during dual-hemisphere tDCS was significantly higher than that in the uni-hemisphere or sham tDCS conditions when the grating width was set to 0.75. mm (all p<. 0.05). Conclusions: Dual-hemisphere tDCS over S1 improved performance in a tactile spatial discrimination task in healthy volunteers. Significance: Dual-hemisphere tDCS may be a useful strategy to improve sensory function in patients with sensory dysfunctions.

AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) could improve performance in a tactile spatial discriminative task, compared with uni-hemisphere or sham tDCS. Methods: Nine healthy adults participated in this double-blind, sham-controlled, and cross-over design study. The performance in a grating orientation task (GOT) in the right index finger was evaluated before, during, immediately after and 30. min after the dual-hemisphere, uni-hemisphere (1. mA, 20. min), or sham tDCS (1. mA, 30. s) over S1. In the dual-hemisphere and sham conditions, anodal tDCS was applied over the left S1, and cathodal tDCS was applied over the right S1. In the uni-hemisphere condition, anodal tDCS was applied over the left S1, and cathodal tDCS was applied over the contralateral supraorbital front. Results: The percentage of correct responses on the GOT during dual-hemisphere tDCS was significantly higher than that in the uni-hemisphere or sham tDCS conditions when the grating width was set to 0.75. mm (all p<. 0.05). Conclusions: Dual-hemisphere tDCS over S1 improved performance in a tactile spatial discrimination task in healthy volunteers. Significance: Dual-hemisphere tDCS may be a useful strategy to improve sensory function in patients with sensory dysfunctions.

KW - Cortical plasticity

KW - Inter-hemispheric inhibition (IHI)

KW - Somatosensory cortex

KW - Tactile

KW - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904056626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904056626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.12.100

DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.12.100

M3 - Article

C2 - 24411524

AN - SCOPUS:84904056626

VL - 125

SP - 1669

EP - 1674

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 8

ER -