Dynamics of entering politically risky foreign markets

Lailani Laynesa Alcantara, Hitoshi Mitsuhashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of political risk on firms' likelihood of foreign market entry and performance by adopting a strategic view of political risk and drawing upon the arguments of multimarket contact theory. Design/methodology/approach: This study estimates the location choice and performance of Japanese auto parts-makers using panel regression models. Findings: The study finds that firms with low multimarket contact in the home country and high multimarket contact in the host country are less likely to avoid politically risky host countries and that firms which entered politically risky host countries exhibit greater performance when the degree of multimarket contact with prior entrants is high. Research limitations/implications: Although the research design raises a concern about the generalizability of the findings, this study highlights the strategic importance of politically risky markets and suggests the importance of considering competitive interactions with rivals in examining interdependent behavior in foreign direct investments. Practical implications: Instead of consistently avoiding politically risky markets, managers should actively consider the potential strategic importance of these markets. A post-entry strategy suggested by the findings is taking positive steps to leverage the benefits of multimarket contacts for managing subsidiaries in politically risky host countries. Originality/value: Unlike previous studies, this study emphasizes the strategic potential of politically risky markets and takes a view that firms have variable political risk tolerance. Furthermore, the authors' adoption of multimarket contact theory allows a novel approach to benchmarking against rivals for foreign entry decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)580-595
Number of pages16
JournalManagement Research Review
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 May

Fingerprint

Multimarket contact
Host country
Political risk
Research design
Home country
Location choice
Market performance
Interaction
Entry strategy
Foreign direct investment
Foreign market entry
Generalizability
Foreign entry
Risk tolerance
Benchmarking
Panel regression
Subsidiaries
Managers
Regression model
Leverage

Keywords

  • Automotive components industry
  • Competitors
  • International expansion
  • International marketing
  • Japan
  • Market entry
  • Multimarket contact
  • Political risk
  • Rivalry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Dynamics of entering politically risky foreign markets. / Alcantara, Lailani Laynesa; Mitsuhashi, Hitoshi.

In: Management Research Review, Vol. 36, No. 6, 05.2013, p. 580-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alcantara, Lailani Laynesa ; Mitsuhashi, Hitoshi. / Dynamics of entering politically risky foreign markets. In: Management Research Review. 2013 ; Vol. 36, No. 6. pp. 580-595.
@article{d23b65bfb5dd4e5ab7f109837aa7cba8,
title = "Dynamics of entering politically risky foreign markets",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of political risk on firms' likelihood of foreign market entry and performance by adopting a strategic view of political risk and drawing upon the arguments of multimarket contact theory. Design/methodology/approach: This study estimates the location choice and performance of Japanese auto parts-makers using panel regression models. Findings: The study finds that firms with low multimarket contact in the home country and high multimarket contact in the host country are less likely to avoid politically risky host countries and that firms which entered politically risky host countries exhibit greater performance when the degree of multimarket contact with prior entrants is high. Research limitations/implications: Although the research design raises a concern about the generalizability of the findings, this study highlights the strategic importance of politically risky markets and suggests the importance of considering competitive interactions with rivals in examining interdependent behavior in foreign direct investments. Practical implications: Instead of consistently avoiding politically risky markets, managers should actively consider the potential strategic importance of these markets. A post-entry strategy suggested by the findings is taking positive steps to leverage the benefits of multimarket contacts for managing subsidiaries in politically risky host countries. Originality/value: Unlike previous studies, this study emphasizes the strategic potential of politically risky markets and takes a view that firms have variable political risk tolerance. Furthermore, the authors' adoption of multimarket contact theory allows a novel approach to benchmarking against rivals for foreign entry decisions.",
keywords = "Automotive components industry, Competitors, International expansion, International marketing, Japan, Market entry, Multimarket contact, Political risk, Rivalry",
author = "Alcantara, {Lailani Laynesa} and Hitoshi Mitsuhashi",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1108/01409171311325741",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "580--595",
journal = "Management Research Review",
issn = "2040-8269",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamics of entering politically risky foreign markets

AU - Alcantara, Lailani Laynesa

AU - Mitsuhashi, Hitoshi

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of political risk on firms' likelihood of foreign market entry and performance by adopting a strategic view of political risk and drawing upon the arguments of multimarket contact theory. Design/methodology/approach: This study estimates the location choice and performance of Japanese auto parts-makers using panel regression models. Findings: The study finds that firms with low multimarket contact in the home country and high multimarket contact in the host country are less likely to avoid politically risky host countries and that firms which entered politically risky host countries exhibit greater performance when the degree of multimarket contact with prior entrants is high. Research limitations/implications: Although the research design raises a concern about the generalizability of the findings, this study highlights the strategic importance of politically risky markets and suggests the importance of considering competitive interactions with rivals in examining interdependent behavior in foreign direct investments. Practical implications: Instead of consistently avoiding politically risky markets, managers should actively consider the potential strategic importance of these markets. A post-entry strategy suggested by the findings is taking positive steps to leverage the benefits of multimarket contacts for managing subsidiaries in politically risky host countries. Originality/value: Unlike previous studies, this study emphasizes the strategic potential of politically risky markets and takes a view that firms have variable political risk tolerance. Furthermore, the authors' adoption of multimarket contact theory allows a novel approach to benchmarking against rivals for foreign entry decisions.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of political risk on firms' likelihood of foreign market entry and performance by adopting a strategic view of political risk and drawing upon the arguments of multimarket contact theory. Design/methodology/approach: This study estimates the location choice and performance of Japanese auto parts-makers using panel regression models. Findings: The study finds that firms with low multimarket contact in the home country and high multimarket contact in the host country are less likely to avoid politically risky host countries and that firms which entered politically risky host countries exhibit greater performance when the degree of multimarket contact with prior entrants is high. Research limitations/implications: Although the research design raises a concern about the generalizability of the findings, this study highlights the strategic importance of politically risky markets and suggests the importance of considering competitive interactions with rivals in examining interdependent behavior in foreign direct investments. Practical implications: Instead of consistently avoiding politically risky markets, managers should actively consider the potential strategic importance of these markets. A post-entry strategy suggested by the findings is taking positive steps to leverage the benefits of multimarket contacts for managing subsidiaries in politically risky host countries. Originality/value: Unlike previous studies, this study emphasizes the strategic potential of politically risky markets and takes a view that firms have variable political risk tolerance. Furthermore, the authors' adoption of multimarket contact theory allows a novel approach to benchmarking against rivals for foreign entry decisions.

KW - Automotive components industry

KW - Competitors

KW - International expansion

KW - International marketing

KW - Japan

KW - Market entry

KW - Multimarket contact

KW - Political risk

KW - Rivalry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878214247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878214247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/01409171311325741

DO - 10.1108/01409171311325741

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878214247

VL - 36

SP - 580

EP - 595

JO - Management Research Review

JF - Management Research Review

SN - 2040-8269

IS - 6

ER -