TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of an end-of-life gerontological nursing education programme on the attitudes and knowledge of clinical nurses
T2 - A non-randomised controlled trial
AU - Okumura-Hiroshige, Akemi
AU - Fukahori, Hiroki
AU - Yoshioka, Sachiko
AU - Nishiyama, Midori
AU - Takamichi, Kaori
AU - Kuwata, Miyoko
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a research grant for hospice palliative care from the Sasakawa Memorial Health Foundation (No. 2014A-14) and the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP15H05092. The authors express their gratitude to Yuko Shiozuka, MSN; Sanae Takanashi, MSN; Kazuko Tanaka, MSN; Ayako Saida, MSN; Junko Okamoto, MSN; Kumi Tanaka, MSN; Namiko Wada, MSN; Mariko Suzuki, MSN; Yuka Yamashita, MSN; Kunie Turuya, MSN; Seiko Inano, MSN; and Yumiko Hanahusa, MSN; Yutaka Hashimoto, MSN; Tomoko Ichikawa, MSN; Miho Handa, MSN; Takako Uchibe, MSN; Michiko Hasegawa, MSN; Akiko Hashimoto, MSN; Noriko Sato, MSN; Kaoru Harada, MSN; Yukiko Agatuma, MSN; Emiko Nashiki, MSN; and Shin Otomo, MSN, for their help in conducting the intervention. We would also like to thank Kana Sato, PhD, and Ai Tomotaki, MSc, for their help in statistical support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Aims: To evaluate how a structured interactive two-day education programme for clinical nurses on end-of-life (EOL) care for older people affects nurses’ attitudes and knowledge. Design: Non-randomised controlled trial. Methods: Nurses were recruited separately for intervention and control groups. The intervention group assisted older patients with EOL care and recruited patients for the programme. To prevent sampling bias, control group nurses were recruited from a facility with numerous EOL care opportunities. The intervention was a two-day educational programme. Using valid and reliable scales, we evaluated the attitudes (total score range: 26–130) and knowledge (total score range: 0–51) of the intervention group four times (pretraining, post-training, 3 months, 6 months) and the control group three times (baseline, 3 months, 6 months) between January 2016 and April 2017. Analysis of covariance examined both groups’ score changes at 3 and 6 months while adjusting for confounding factors. Results: Participants were 338 nurses caring primarily for older people (intervention group: 164; control group: 174); 142 responded at all measurement points. The change in mean value of the attitude scale from baseline to 3 months (differences in the groups’ attitude scores = 7.33; 95% CI = 2.43–12.24; p =.004) and 6 months (differences in groups’ attitude scores = 5.77; 95% CI = 0.17–11.37; p =.044) was greater in the intervention group. Moreover, the mean knowledge scale score change from baseline to 3 months was greater in the intervention group (differences in groups’ knowledge scores = 5.74; 95% CI = 4.07 to 7.39; p <.001). There was no evidence of a change in this score between baseline and 6 months. Conclusion: The programme improved nurses’ medium- to long-term attitudes and knowledge. Thus, it may help nurses enhance the quality of care they provide. Implications for practice: A two-day educational program improves nurses’ medium- to long-term attitudes and knowledge on end-oflife care. For quality end-of-life care for older people, a structured and evidence-based educational program should be provided to nursing staff.
AB - Aims: To evaluate how a structured interactive two-day education programme for clinical nurses on end-of-life (EOL) care for older people affects nurses’ attitudes and knowledge. Design: Non-randomised controlled trial. Methods: Nurses were recruited separately for intervention and control groups. The intervention group assisted older patients with EOL care and recruited patients for the programme. To prevent sampling bias, control group nurses were recruited from a facility with numerous EOL care opportunities. The intervention was a two-day educational programme. Using valid and reliable scales, we evaluated the attitudes (total score range: 26–130) and knowledge (total score range: 0–51) of the intervention group four times (pretraining, post-training, 3 months, 6 months) and the control group three times (baseline, 3 months, 6 months) between January 2016 and April 2017. Analysis of covariance examined both groups’ score changes at 3 and 6 months while adjusting for confounding factors. Results: Participants were 338 nurses caring primarily for older people (intervention group: 164; control group: 174); 142 responded at all measurement points. The change in mean value of the attitude scale from baseline to 3 months (differences in the groups’ attitude scores = 7.33; 95% CI = 2.43–12.24; p =.004) and 6 months (differences in groups’ attitude scores = 5.77; 95% CI = 0.17–11.37; p =.044) was greater in the intervention group. Moreover, the mean knowledge scale score change from baseline to 3 months was greater in the intervention group (differences in groups’ knowledge scores = 5.74; 95% CI = 4.07 to 7.39; p <.001). There was no evidence of a change in this score between baseline and 6 months. Conclusion: The programme improved nurses’ medium- to long-term attitudes and knowledge. Thus, it may help nurses enhance the quality of care they provide. Implications for practice: A two-day educational program improves nurses’ medium- to long-term attitudes and knowledge on end-oflife care. For quality end-of-life care for older people, a structured and evidence-based educational program should be provided to nursing staff.
KW - education
KW - end-of-life care
KW - gerontology
KW - nurses
KW - palliative care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080098845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85080098845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/opn.12309
DO - 10.1111/opn.12309
M3 - Article
C2 - 32103640
AN - SCOPUS:85080098845
SN - 1748-3735
VL - 15
JO - International journal of older people nursing
JF - International journal of older people nursing
IS - 3
M1 - e12309
ER -