Effect of distal venous drainage on the survival of four-territory flaps with no pedicle vein: Results from a rat model

Seong Oh Park, Jeongmok Cho, Nobuaki Imanishi, Hak Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Venous super-drainage can improve flap survival not only because it prevents congestion, but also because it affects the dominant circulation in multi-territory thin skin flaps. We aimed to evaluate the survival of various flap areas and detect vascular changes in artery-based, four-territory skin flaps after different distal venous drainage procedures. Methods: 4 x 12 cm sized flaps were elevated based only on the deep circumflex iliac artery. Fifty rats were divided into five groups, as follows: group 1, flaps drained with the deep circumflex iliac vein; group 2, flaps drained with the ipsilateral superficial inferior epigastric vein; group 3, flaps drained with the contralateral superficial inferior epigastric vein; group 4, flaps drained with the contralateral deep circumflex iliac vein; and group 5, flaps super-drained with the contralateral deep circumflex iliac vein. On the fourth postoperative day, the survival of the flaps was assessed by measuring the necrotic and surviving areas, and vascular changes were evaluated angiographically. Results: Compared to flaps with only arterial-based pedicles, most flaps with distant drainage showed significantly greater survival. The flap survival area percentages were 37.82 ± 5.01%, 49.23 ± 10.47%, 68.22 ± 9.24%, 83.90 ± 12.03%, and 89.17 ± 10.42% for groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Furthermore, distal vein drainage above the ventral midline resulted in significantly better flap survival. Super-drainage and drainage via the most distal vein resulted in similar flap survival. Conclusions: Distal vein drainage is effective for increasing survival in artery-based flaps.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Drainage
Veins
Iliac Vein
Blood Vessels
Arteries
Skin
Iliac Artery

Keywords

  • Artery-based flap
  • Distal venous drainage
  • Four-territory flap
  • No pedicle vein
  • Rat flap

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{700f82e2189f4f869b6a3fbd32ea6a5c,
title = "Effect of distal venous drainage on the survival of four-territory flaps with no pedicle vein: Results from a rat model",
abstract = "Background: Venous super-drainage can improve flap survival not only because it prevents congestion, but also because it affects the dominant circulation in multi-territory thin skin flaps. We aimed to evaluate the survival of various flap areas and detect vascular changes in artery-based, four-territory skin flaps after different distal venous drainage procedures. Methods: 4 x 12 cm sized flaps were elevated based only on the deep circumflex iliac artery. Fifty rats were divided into five groups, as follows: group 1, flaps drained with the deep circumflex iliac vein; group 2, flaps drained with the ipsilateral superficial inferior epigastric vein; group 3, flaps drained with the contralateral superficial inferior epigastric vein; group 4, flaps drained with the contralateral deep circumflex iliac vein; and group 5, flaps super-drained with the contralateral deep circumflex iliac vein. On the fourth postoperative day, the survival of the flaps was assessed by measuring the necrotic and surviving areas, and vascular changes were evaluated angiographically. Results: Compared to flaps with only arterial-based pedicles, most flaps with distant drainage showed significantly greater survival. The flap survival area percentages were 37.82 ± 5.01{\%}, 49.23 ± 10.47{\%}, 68.22 ± 9.24{\%}, 83.90 ± 12.03{\%}, and 89.17 ± 10.42{\%} for groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Furthermore, distal vein drainage above the ventral midline resulted in significantly better flap survival. Super-drainage and drainage via the most distal vein resulted in similar flap survival. Conclusions: Distal vein drainage is effective for increasing survival in artery-based flaps.",
keywords = "Artery-based flap, Distal venous drainage, Four-territory flap, No pedicle vein, Rat flap",
author = "Park, {Seong Oh} and Jeongmok Cho and Nobuaki Imanishi and Hak Chang",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.bjps.2017.09.001",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery",
issn = "1748-6815",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of distal venous drainage on the survival of four-territory flaps with no pedicle vein

T2 - Results from a rat model

AU - Park, Seong Oh

AU - Cho, Jeongmok

AU - Imanishi, Nobuaki

AU - Chang, Hak

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: Venous super-drainage can improve flap survival not only because it prevents congestion, but also because it affects the dominant circulation in multi-territory thin skin flaps. We aimed to evaluate the survival of various flap areas and detect vascular changes in artery-based, four-territory skin flaps after different distal venous drainage procedures. Methods: 4 x 12 cm sized flaps were elevated based only on the deep circumflex iliac artery. Fifty rats were divided into five groups, as follows: group 1, flaps drained with the deep circumflex iliac vein; group 2, flaps drained with the ipsilateral superficial inferior epigastric vein; group 3, flaps drained with the contralateral superficial inferior epigastric vein; group 4, flaps drained with the contralateral deep circumflex iliac vein; and group 5, flaps super-drained with the contralateral deep circumflex iliac vein. On the fourth postoperative day, the survival of the flaps was assessed by measuring the necrotic and surviving areas, and vascular changes were evaluated angiographically. Results: Compared to flaps with only arterial-based pedicles, most flaps with distant drainage showed significantly greater survival. The flap survival area percentages were 37.82 ± 5.01%, 49.23 ± 10.47%, 68.22 ± 9.24%, 83.90 ± 12.03%, and 89.17 ± 10.42% for groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Furthermore, distal vein drainage above the ventral midline resulted in significantly better flap survival. Super-drainage and drainage via the most distal vein resulted in similar flap survival. Conclusions: Distal vein drainage is effective for increasing survival in artery-based flaps.

AB - Background: Venous super-drainage can improve flap survival not only because it prevents congestion, but also because it affects the dominant circulation in multi-territory thin skin flaps. We aimed to evaluate the survival of various flap areas and detect vascular changes in artery-based, four-territory skin flaps after different distal venous drainage procedures. Methods: 4 x 12 cm sized flaps were elevated based only on the deep circumflex iliac artery. Fifty rats were divided into five groups, as follows: group 1, flaps drained with the deep circumflex iliac vein; group 2, flaps drained with the ipsilateral superficial inferior epigastric vein; group 3, flaps drained with the contralateral superficial inferior epigastric vein; group 4, flaps drained with the contralateral deep circumflex iliac vein; and group 5, flaps super-drained with the contralateral deep circumflex iliac vein. On the fourth postoperative day, the survival of the flaps was assessed by measuring the necrotic and surviving areas, and vascular changes were evaluated angiographically. Results: Compared to flaps with only arterial-based pedicles, most flaps with distant drainage showed significantly greater survival. The flap survival area percentages were 37.82 ± 5.01%, 49.23 ± 10.47%, 68.22 ± 9.24%, 83.90 ± 12.03%, and 89.17 ± 10.42% for groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Furthermore, distal vein drainage above the ventral midline resulted in significantly better flap survival. Super-drainage and drainage via the most distal vein resulted in similar flap survival. Conclusions: Distal vein drainage is effective for increasing survival in artery-based flaps.

KW - Artery-based flap

KW - Distal venous drainage

KW - Four-territory flap

KW - No pedicle vein

KW - Rat flap

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029708165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029708165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.09.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 28958568

AN - SCOPUS:85029708165

JO - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

JF - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

SN - 1748-6815

ER -