Effect of procedural volume on outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Japan

Implication toward public reporting and minimal volume standards

Hiroaki Miyata, Noboru Motomura, Yuichi Ueda, Hikaru Matsuda, Shinichi Takamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Since the Japanese government updated the medical practice laws, each hospital has to submit procedural volume from April 2007 and may sometime in the future have to submit some outcome indicators. It is very important to examine whether procedural volume is accurate and appropriate. Methods: We analyzed 4581 procedures from 36 centers between 2003 and 2005 by clinical database. The effect of hospital volume on each outcome was tested by a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model, covering clinical risk factors, procedural year, clinical processes, and hospital volume/surgeon volume as a fixed effect and random intercepts for sites. Results: Logistic regression model revealed a significant association between hospital bypass graft volume and 30-day mortality (P < .05) and operative mortality (P < .01). Surgeon procedural volume, however, did not have a significant effect on those outcomes. The effect of hospital procedural volume was associated with better outcomes in most patient subgroups: age younger than 65 years (P < .05), age 65 years and older (P < .01), low risk (P = .58), and high risk (P < .01). Conclusion: In Japan, high-volume compared with low-volume providers had better outcomes. As for public reporting in Japan, hospital-based evaluation might be more credible than surgeon-based evaluation. Although minimal volume standards might be effective to improve quality to some extent, volume has limitations as a marker of quality because of its wide range of variance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1306-1312
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume135
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jun
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Bypass
Japan
Transplants
Logistic Models
Mortality
Databases
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Effect of procedural volume on outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Japan : Implication toward public reporting and minimal volume standards. / Miyata, Hiroaki; Motomura, Noboru; Ueda, Yuichi; Matsuda, Hikaru; Takamoto, Shinichi.

In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 135, No. 6, 06.2008, p. 1306-1312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{65ac844746534d75a2769eb2f5c42c9b,
title = "Effect of procedural volume on outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Japan: Implication toward public reporting and minimal volume standards",
abstract = "Background: Since the Japanese government updated the medical practice laws, each hospital has to submit procedural volume from April 2007 and may sometime in the future have to submit some outcome indicators. It is very important to examine whether procedural volume is accurate and appropriate. Methods: We analyzed 4581 procedures from 36 centers between 2003 and 2005 by clinical database. The effect of hospital volume on each outcome was tested by a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model, covering clinical risk factors, procedural year, clinical processes, and hospital volume/surgeon volume as a fixed effect and random intercepts for sites. Results: Logistic regression model revealed a significant association between hospital bypass graft volume and 30-day mortality (P < .05) and operative mortality (P < .01). Surgeon procedural volume, however, did not have a significant effect on those outcomes. The effect of hospital procedural volume was associated with better outcomes in most patient subgroups: age younger than 65 years (P < .05), age 65 years and older (P < .01), low risk (P = .58), and high risk (P < .01). Conclusion: In Japan, high-volume compared with low-volume providers had better outcomes. As for public reporting in Japan, hospital-based evaluation might be more credible than surgeon-based evaluation. Although minimal volume standards might be effective to improve quality to some extent, volume has limitations as a marker of quality because of its wide range of variance.",
author = "Hiroaki Miyata and Noboru Motomura and Yuichi Ueda and Hikaru Matsuda and Shinichi Takamoto",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.079",
language = "English",
volume = "135",
pages = "1306--1312",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "0022-5223",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of procedural volume on outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Japan

T2 - Implication toward public reporting and minimal volume standards

AU - Miyata, Hiroaki

AU - Motomura, Noboru

AU - Ueda, Yuichi

AU - Matsuda, Hikaru

AU - Takamoto, Shinichi

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Background: Since the Japanese government updated the medical practice laws, each hospital has to submit procedural volume from April 2007 and may sometime in the future have to submit some outcome indicators. It is very important to examine whether procedural volume is accurate and appropriate. Methods: We analyzed 4581 procedures from 36 centers between 2003 and 2005 by clinical database. The effect of hospital volume on each outcome was tested by a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model, covering clinical risk factors, procedural year, clinical processes, and hospital volume/surgeon volume as a fixed effect and random intercepts for sites. Results: Logistic regression model revealed a significant association between hospital bypass graft volume and 30-day mortality (P < .05) and operative mortality (P < .01). Surgeon procedural volume, however, did not have a significant effect on those outcomes. The effect of hospital procedural volume was associated with better outcomes in most patient subgroups: age younger than 65 years (P < .05), age 65 years and older (P < .01), low risk (P = .58), and high risk (P < .01). Conclusion: In Japan, high-volume compared with low-volume providers had better outcomes. As for public reporting in Japan, hospital-based evaluation might be more credible than surgeon-based evaluation. Although minimal volume standards might be effective to improve quality to some extent, volume has limitations as a marker of quality because of its wide range of variance.

AB - Background: Since the Japanese government updated the medical practice laws, each hospital has to submit procedural volume from April 2007 and may sometime in the future have to submit some outcome indicators. It is very important to examine whether procedural volume is accurate and appropriate. Methods: We analyzed 4581 procedures from 36 centers between 2003 and 2005 by clinical database. The effect of hospital volume on each outcome was tested by a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model, covering clinical risk factors, procedural year, clinical processes, and hospital volume/surgeon volume as a fixed effect and random intercepts for sites. Results: Logistic regression model revealed a significant association between hospital bypass graft volume and 30-day mortality (P < .05) and operative mortality (P < .01). Surgeon procedural volume, however, did not have a significant effect on those outcomes. The effect of hospital procedural volume was associated with better outcomes in most patient subgroups: age younger than 65 years (P < .05), age 65 years and older (P < .01), low risk (P = .58), and high risk (P < .01). Conclusion: In Japan, high-volume compared with low-volume providers had better outcomes. As for public reporting in Japan, hospital-based evaluation might be more credible than surgeon-based evaluation. Although minimal volume standards might be effective to improve quality to some extent, volume has limitations as a marker of quality because of its wide range of variance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44849139515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44849139515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.079

DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.079

M3 - Article

VL - 135

SP - 1306

EP - 1312

JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 0022-5223

IS - 6

ER -