Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments: Differences between surgical techniques

Tae Yup Kim, Kyoung Tak Kang, Do Heum Yoon, Hyun Chul Shin, Keung Nyun Kim, Seong Yi, Heoung Jae Chun, Jae Keun Oh, Gwi Hyun Choi, Kwang Lee, Yoon Ha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN. A finite element analysis. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the differences between surgical techniques in terms of the effects of arthrodesis on adjacent segments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Augmentation with posterior rigid fixation combined with transpedicular screw insertion, which is one of the most popular techniques for lumbar arthrodesis, shows benefits in immediate stabilization and a higher fusion rate but is reportedly correlated with greater stress on adjacent segments. However, the increased stress on adjacent segments needs further evaluation because the differences of the effects on adjacent segments between surgical techniques, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and semirigid fixation, have not yet been determined. METHODS. A finite element model of the human lumbar spine was developed. Three spinal segments (L2-L5) were used to investigate. The intact spinal model was validated by comparing it with previously reported models. Then, 4 arthrodesis models were analyzed and compared: (1) anterior lumbar interbody fusion model; (2) posterior lumbar interbody fusion model; (3) semirigid fixation model combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion; and (4) rigid fixation model combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion. RESULTS. Among these 4 models, the rigid fixation model showed the greatest amount of stress, with increased intervertebral disc pressure and contact force of the facet joints of both upper and lower adjacent segments. The second highest stress levels were seen in the semirigid fixation model and the lowest stress levels were seen in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion model. CONCLUSION. Although bony fusion had been completed, the effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments could vary according to the surgical technique used for arthrodesis. Semirigid fixation combined with arthrodesis deserves careful consideration and further detailed study because it may cause less stress on adjacent segments than rigid fixation while maintaining the benefits of the latter procedure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1456-1462
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume37
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Aug 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Arthrodesis
Zygapophyseal Joint
Finite Element Analysis
Intervertebral Disc
Spine
Pressure

Keywords

  • adjacent segment
  • arthrodesis
  • biomechanics
  • dynamic stabilization
  • finite element analysis
  • lumbar spine
  • semirigid fixation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Kim, T. Y., Kang, K. T., Yoon, D. H., Shin, H. C., Kim, K. N., Yi, S., ... Ha, Y. (2012). Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments: Differences between surgical techniques. Spine, 37(17), 1456-1462. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824da81d

Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments : Differences between surgical techniques. / Kim, Tae Yup; Kang, Kyoung Tak; Yoon, Do Heum; Shin, Hyun Chul; Kim, Keung Nyun; Yi, Seong; Chun, Heoung Jae; Oh, Jae Keun; Choi, Gwi Hyun; Lee, Kwang; Ha, Yoon.

In: Spine, Vol. 37, No. 17, 01.08.2012, p. 1456-1462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, TY, Kang, KT, Yoon, DH, Shin, HC, Kim, KN, Yi, S, Chun, HJ, Oh, JK, Choi, GH, Lee, K & Ha, Y 2012, 'Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments: Differences between surgical techniques', Spine, vol. 37, no. 17, pp. 1456-1462. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824da81d
Kim, Tae Yup ; Kang, Kyoung Tak ; Yoon, Do Heum ; Shin, Hyun Chul ; Kim, Keung Nyun ; Yi, Seong ; Chun, Heoung Jae ; Oh, Jae Keun ; Choi, Gwi Hyun ; Lee, Kwang ; Ha, Yoon. / Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments : Differences between surgical techniques. In: Spine. 2012 ; Vol. 37, No. 17. pp. 1456-1462.
@article{ff75796467ec48cdb2b44cf9885d82cf,
title = "Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments: Differences between surgical techniques",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN. A finite element analysis. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the differences between surgical techniques in terms of the effects of arthrodesis on adjacent segments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Augmentation with posterior rigid fixation combined with transpedicular screw insertion, which is one of the most popular techniques for lumbar arthrodesis, shows benefits in immediate stabilization and a higher fusion rate but is reportedly correlated with greater stress on adjacent segments. However, the increased stress on adjacent segments needs further evaluation because the differences of the effects on adjacent segments between surgical techniques, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and semirigid fixation, have not yet been determined. METHODS. A finite element model of the human lumbar spine was developed. Three spinal segments (L2-L5) were used to investigate. The intact spinal model was validated by comparing it with previously reported models. Then, 4 arthrodesis models were analyzed and compared: (1) anterior lumbar interbody fusion model; (2) posterior lumbar interbody fusion model; (3) semirigid fixation model combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion; and (4) rigid fixation model combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion. RESULTS. Among these 4 models, the rigid fixation model showed the greatest amount of stress, with increased intervertebral disc pressure and contact force of the facet joints of both upper and lower adjacent segments. The second highest stress levels were seen in the semirigid fixation model and the lowest stress levels were seen in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion model. CONCLUSION. Although bony fusion had been completed, the effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments could vary according to the surgical technique used for arthrodesis. Semirigid fixation combined with arthrodesis deserves careful consideration and further detailed study because it may cause less stress on adjacent segments than rigid fixation while maintaining the benefits of the latter procedure.",
keywords = "adjacent segment, arthrodesis, biomechanics, dynamic stabilization, finite element analysis, lumbar spine, semirigid fixation",
author = "Kim, {Tae Yup} and Kang, {Kyoung Tak} and Yoon, {Do Heum} and Shin, {Hyun Chul} and Kim, {Keung Nyun} and Seong Yi and Chun, {Heoung Jae} and Oh, {Jae Keun} and Choi, {Gwi Hyun} and Kwang Lee and Yoon Ha",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824da81d",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1456--1462",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments

T2 - Differences between surgical techniques

AU - Kim, Tae Yup

AU - Kang, Kyoung Tak

AU - Yoon, Do Heum

AU - Shin, Hyun Chul

AU - Kim, Keung Nyun

AU - Yi, Seong

AU - Chun, Heoung Jae

AU - Oh, Jae Keun

AU - Choi, Gwi Hyun

AU - Lee, Kwang

AU - Ha, Yoon

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - STUDY DESIGN. A finite element analysis. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the differences between surgical techniques in terms of the effects of arthrodesis on adjacent segments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Augmentation with posterior rigid fixation combined with transpedicular screw insertion, which is one of the most popular techniques for lumbar arthrodesis, shows benefits in immediate stabilization and a higher fusion rate but is reportedly correlated with greater stress on adjacent segments. However, the increased stress on adjacent segments needs further evaluation because the differences of the effects on adjacent segments between surgical techniques, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and semirigid fixation, have not yet been determined. METHODS. A finite element model of the human lumbar spine was developed. Three spinal segments (L2-L5) were used to investigate. The intact spinal model was validated by comparing it with previously reported models. Then, 4 arthrodesis models were analyzed and compared: (1) anterior lumbar interbody fusion model; (2) posterior lumbar interbody fusion model; (3) semirigid fixation model combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion; and (4) rigid fixation model combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion. RESULTS. Among these 4 models, the rigid fixation model showed the greatest amount of stress, with increased intervertebral disc pressure and contact force of the facet joints of both upper and lower adjacent segments. The second highest stress levels were seen in the semirigid fixation model and the lowest stress levels were seen in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion model. CONCLUSION. Although bony fusion had been completed, the effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments could vary according to the surgical technique used for arthrodesis. Semirigid fixation combined with arthrodesis deserves careful consideration and further detailed study because it may cause less stress on adjacent segments than rigid fixation while maintaining the benefits of the latter procedure.

AB - STUDY DESIGN. A finite element analysis. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the differences between surgical techniques in terms of the effects of arthrodesis on adjacent segments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Augmentation with posterior rigid fixation combined with transpedicular screw insertion, which is one of the most popular techniques for lumbar arthrodesis, shows benefits in immediate stabilization and a higher fusion rate but is reportedly correlated with greater stress on adjacent segments. However, the increased stress on adjacent segments needs further evaluation because the differences of the effects on adjacent segments between surgical techniques, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and semirigid fixation, have not yet been determined. METHODS. A finite element model of the human lumbar spine was developed. Three spinal segments (L2-L5) were used to investigate. The intact spinal model was validated by comparing it with previously reported models. Then, 4 arthrodesis models were analyzed and compared: (1) anterior lumbar interbody fusion model; (2) posterior lumbar interbody fusion model; (3) semirigid fixation model combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion; and (4) rigid fixation model combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion. RESULTS. Among these 4 models, the rigid fixation model showed the greatest amount of stress, with increased intervertebral disc pressure and contact force of the facet joints of both upper and lower adjacent segments. The second highest stress levels were seen in the semirigid fixation model and the lowest stress levels were seen in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion model. CONCLUSION. Although bony fusion had been completed, the effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments could vary according to the surgical technique used for arthrodesis. Semirigid fixation combined with arthrodesis deserves careful consideration and further detailed study because it may cause less stress on adjacent segments than rigid fixation while maintaining the benefits of the latter procedure.

KW - adjacent segment

KW - arthrodesis

KW - biomechanics

KW - dynamic stabilization

KW - finite element analysis

KW - lumbar spine

KW - semirigid fixation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864478806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864478806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824da81d

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824da81d

M3 - Article

C2 - 22333957

AN - SCOPUS:84864478806

VL - 37

SP - 1456

EP - 1462

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 17

ER -