Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments: Differences between surgical techniques

Tae Yup Kim, Kyoung Tak Kang, Do Heum Yoon, Hyun Chul Shin, Keung Nyun Kim, Seong Yi, Heoung Jae Chun, Jae Keun Oh, Gwi Hyun Choi, Kwang Lee, Yoon Ha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN. A finite element analysis. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the differences between surgical techniques in terms of the effects of arthrodesis on adjacent segments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Augmentation with posterior rigid fixation combined with transpedicular screw insertion, which is one of the most popular techniques for lumbar arthrodesis, shows benefits in immediate stabilization and a higher fusion rate but is reportedly correlated with greater stress on adjacent segments. However, the increased stress on adjacent segments needs further evaluation because the differences of the effects on adjacent segments between surgical techniques, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and semirigid fixation, have not yet been determined. METHODS. A finite element model of the human lumbar spine was developed. Three spinal segments (L2-L5) were used to investigate. The intact spinal model was validated by comparing it with previously reported models. Then, 4 arthrodesis models were analyzed and compared: (1) anterior lumbar interbody fusion model; (2) posterior lumbar interbody fusion model; (3) semirigid fixation model combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion; and (4) rigid fixation model combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion. RESULTS. Among these 4 models, the rigid fixation model showed the greatest amount of stress, with increased intervertebral disc pressure and contact force of the facet joints of both upper and lower adjacent segments. The second highest stress levels were seen in the semirigid fixation model and the lowest stress levels were seen in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion model. CONCLUSION. Although bony fusion had been completed, the effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments could vary according to the surgical technique used for arthrodesis. Semirigid fixation combined with arthrodesis deserves careful consideration and further detailed study because it may cause less stress on adjacent segments than rigid fixation while maintaining the benefits of the latter procedure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1456-1462
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume37
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Aug 1

Keywords

  • adjacent segment
  • arthrodesis
  • biomechanics
  • dynamic stabilization
  • finite element analysis
  • lumbar spine
  • semirigid fixation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments: Differences between surgical techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kim, T. Y., Kang, K. T., Yoon, D. H., Shin, H. C., Kim, K. N., Yi, S., Chun, H. J., Oh, J. K., Choi, G. H., Lee, K., & Ha, Y. (2012). Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments: Differences between surgical techniques. Spine, 37(17), 1456-1462. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824da81d