TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Prophylactic Foscarnet on Human Herpesvirus-6 Reactivation and Encephalitis in Cord Blood Transplant Recipients
T2 - A Prospective Multicenter Trial with an Historical Control Group
AU - Ogata, Masao
AU - Takano, Kuniko
AU - Moriuchi, Yukiyoshi
AU - Kondo, Tadakazu
AU - Ueki, Toshimitsu
AU - Nakano, Nobuaki
AU - Mori, Takehiko
AU - Uoshima, Nobuhiko
AU - Nagafuji, Koji
AU - Yamasaki, Satoshi
AU - Shibasaki, Yasuhiko
AU - Sakai, Rika
AU - Kato, Koji
AU - Choi, Ilseung
AU - Jo, Yumi
AU - Eto, Tetsuya
AU - Kako, Shinichi
AU - Oshima, Kumi
AU - Fukuda, Takahiro
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial disclosure: This work was supported in part by the Research Program on Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development , AMED ( 17ck0106256h0001 ), and the Japan Society of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation . Nobelpharma Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) provided the foscarnet for this study.
Funding Information:
Financial disclosure: This work was supported in part by the Research Program on Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED (17ck0106256h0001), and the Japan Society of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Nobelpharma Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) provided the foscarnet for this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Cord blood transplantation (CBT) is a distinct risk factor for human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) reactivation and HHV-6 encephalitis. In a prospective multicenter trial we investigated the effects of prophylactic foscarnet (90 mg/kg i.v. infusion from days 7 to 27 after CBT) on the occurrence of HHV-6 reactivation, HHV-6 encephalitis, and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in CBT recipients. Between 2014 and 2016, 57 patients were included in a foscarnet-prophylaxis group. Outcomes were compared with an historical control group who received CBT between 2010 and 2014 (standard-treatment group, n = 63). The cumulative incidence of high-level HHV-6 reactivation, defined as plasma HHV-6 DNA ≥ 10 4 copies/mL, at 60 days after CBT was significantly lower in the foscarnet-prophylaxis group than in the standard-treatment group (18.3% versus 57.3%, P <.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that myeloablative preconditioning and standard treatment were significant risk factors for high-level HHV-6 reactivation. The cumulative incidence of HHV-6 encephalitis at 60 days after CBT was not different between the groups (foscarnet-prophylaxis group, 12.4%; standard-treatment group, 4.9%; P =.14). The cumulative incidences of grades II to IV and grades III to IV aGVHD at 60 days after CBT were not different between the groups (grades II to IV aGVHD: foscarnet-prophylaxis group, 42.0%; standard-treatment group, 40.5%; P =.96; grades III to IV aGVHD: foscarnet-prophylaxis group, 14.5%; standard-treatment group, 14.5%; P = 1.00). In the setting of this study foscarnet significantly suppressed systemic HHV-6 reactivation in CBT recipients but failed to prevent the development of HHV-6 encephalitis. Suppression of HHV-6 reactivation by foscarnet did not show any effects against the incidence of aGVHD.
AB - Cord blood transplantation (CBT) is a distinct risk factor for human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) reactivation and HHV-6 encephalitis. In a prospective multicenter trial we investigated the effects of prophylactic foscarnet (90 mg/kg i.v. infusion from days 7 to 27 after CBT) on the occurrence of HHV-6 reactivation, HHV-6 encephalitis, and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in CBT recipients. Between 2014 and 2016, 57 patients were included in a foscarnet-prophylaxis group. Outcomes were compared with an historical control group who received CBT between 2010 and 2014 (standard-treatment group, n = 63). The cumulative incidence of high-level HHV-6 reactivation, defined as plasma HHV-6 DNA ≥ 10 4 copies/mL, at 60 days after CBT was significantly lower in the foscarnet-prophylaxis group than in the standard-treatment group (18.3% versus 57.3%, P <.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that myeloablative preconditioning and standard treatment were significant risk factors for high-level HHV-6 reactivation. The cumulative incidence of HHV-6 encephalitis at 60 days after CBT was not different between the groups (foscarnet-prophylaxis group, 12.4%; standard-treatment group, 4.9%; P =.14). The cumulative incidences of grades II to IV and grades III to IV aGVHD at 60 days after CBT were not different between the groups (grades II to IV aGVHD: foscarnet-prophylaxis group, 42.0%; standard-treatment group, 40.5%; P =.96; grades III to IV aGVHD: foscarnet-prophylaxis group, 14.5%; standard-treatment group, 14.5%; P = 1.00). In the setting of this study foscarnet significantly suppressed systemic HHV-6 reactivation in CBT recipients but failed to prevent the development of HHV-6 encephalitis. Suppression of HHV-6 reactivation by foscarnet did not show any effects against the incidence of aGVHD.
KW - Acute GVHD
KW - Foscarnet
KW - HHV-6 encephalitis
KW - Human herpesvirus-6
KW - Prophylaxis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044133240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044133240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.02.008
DO - 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.02.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 29454651
AN - SCOPUS:85044133240
SN - 1083-8791
VL - 24
SP - 1264
EP - 1273
JO - Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
JF - Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
IS - 6
ER -