Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics assessment of test data for circumferential cracked pipes

Nam Su Huh, Do Jun Shim, Yun Jae Kim, Young Jin Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

This paper presents experimental validation of two reference stress based methods for circumferential cracked pipes. One is the R6 method where the reference stress is defined by the plastic limit load. The other is the enhanced reference stress method, recently proposed by the authors, where the reference stress is defined by the optimized reference load. Using thirty-eight published pipe test data, the predicted maximum instability loads according to both methods are compared with the experimental ones for pipes with circumferential through-thickness cracks and with part circumferential surface cracks. It is found that the R6 method gives conservative estimates of the maximum loads for all cases. Ratios of the experimental maximum load to the predicted load range from 0.54 to 0.98. On the other hand, the proposed method gives overall closer maximum loads than R6, compared to the experimental data. However, for part through-thickness surface cracks, the estimated loads were slightly non-conservative for four cases, and possible reasons were fully discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-78
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP
Volume461
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Nov 19
Externally publishedYes
Event2003 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference - Cleveland, OH, Afghanistan
Duration: 2003 Jul 202003 Jul 24

Fingerprint

Fracture mechanics
Pipe
Plastics
Cracks
Load limits
Loads (forces)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics assessment of test data for circumferential cracked pipes. / Huh, Nam Su; Shim, Do Jun; Kim, Yun Jae; Kim, Young Jin.

In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP, Vol. 461, 19.11.2003, p. 71-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{9426bccda1ec43ae9ecab9ac8e0a8723,
title = "Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics assessment of test data for circumferential cracked pipes",
abstract = "This paper presents experimental validation of two reference stress based methods for circumferential cracked pipes. One is the R6 method where the reference stress is defined by the plastic limit load. The other is the enhanced reference stress method, recently proposed by the authors, where the reference stress is defined by the optimized reference load. Using thirty-eight published pipe test data, the predicted maximum instability loads according to both methods are compared with the experimental ones for pipes with circumferential through-thickness cracks and with part circumferential surface cracks. It is found that the R6 method gives conservative estimates of the maximum loads for all cases. Ratios of the experimental maximum load to the predicted load range from 0.54 to 0.98. On the other hand, the proposed method gives overall closer maximum loads than R6, compared to the experimental data. However, for part through-thickness surface cracks, the estimated loads were slightly non-conservative for four cases, and possible reasons were fully discussed.",
author = "Huh, {Nam Su} and Shim, {Do Jun} and Kim, {Yun Jae} and Kim, {Young Jin}",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1115/PVP2003-1992",
language = "English",
volume = "461",
pages = "71--78",
journal = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP",
issn = "0277-027X",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics assessment of test data for circumferential cracked pipes

AU - Huh, Nam Su

AU - Shim, Do Jun

AU - Kim, Yun Jae

AU - Kim, Young Jin

PY - 2003/11/19

Y1 - 2003/11/19

N2 - This paper presents experimental validation of two reference stress based methods for circumferential cracked pipes. One is the R6 method where the reference stress is defined by the plastic limit load. The other is the enhanced reference stress method, recently proposed by the authors, where the reference stress is defined by the optimized reference load. Using thirty-eight published pipe test data, the predicted maximum instability loads according to both methods are compared with the experimental ones for pipes with circumferential through-thickness cracks and with part circumferential surface cracks. It is found that the R6 method gives conservative estimates of the maximum loads for all cases. Ratios of the experimental maximum load to the predicted load range from 0.54 to 0.98. On the other hand, the proposed method gives overall closer maximum loads than R6, compared to the experimental data. However, for part through-thickness surface cracks, the estimated loads were slightly non-conservative for four cases, and possible reasons were fully discussed.

AB - This paper presents experimental validation of two reference stress based methods for circumferential cracked pipes. One is the R6 method where the reference stress is defined by the plastic limit load. The other is the enhanced reference stress method, recently proposed by the authors, where the reference stress is defined by the optimized reference load. Using thirty-eight published pipe test data, the predicted maximum instability loads according to both methods are compared with the experimental ones for pipes with circumferential through-thickness cracks and with part circumferential surface cracks. It is found that the R6 method gives conservative estimates of the maximum loads for all cases. Ratios of the experimental maximum load to the predicted load range from 0.54 to 0.98. On the other hand, the proposed method gives overall closer maximum loads than R6, compared to the experimental data. However, for part through-thickness surface cracks, the estimated loads were slightly non-conservative for four cases, and possible reasons were fully discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242442555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242442555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/PVP2003-1992

DO - 10.1115/PVP2003-1992

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:0242442555

VL - 461

SP - 71

EP - 78

JO - American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP

JF - American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP

SN - 0277-027X

ER -