Electrical Isolation of Superior Vena Cava Using Upstream PN Pacing to Avoid Phrenic Nerve Injury

Takehiro Kimura, Seiji Takatsuki, Nobuhiro Nishiyama, Kotaro Fukumoto, Yoshiyasu Aizawa, Yukiko Karube, Shunichiro Miyoshi, Keiichi Fukuda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a potential complication during superior vena cava (SVC) isolation to cure atrial fibrillation (AF). Avoiding radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery is safer but may lead to a failed isolation. High-output PN pacing above the ablation site, upstream PN pacing, is a promising technique to avoid PN injury. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of delivering RF energy at the site where high-output pacing captures PN. Methods and Results: SVC isolation was carried out in 41 drug-resistant AF patients. When high-output pacing (25 mA) from the ablation catheter captured PN, upstream PN pacing (cycle length: 1000-1500msec) was applied during RF delivery. RF energy was ceased upon the failure or weakness of diaphragmatic twitching. The feasibility of SVC isolation using upstream PN pacing was investigated. In all 41 patients, SVC isolation was successfully achieved. RF energy was delivered at the PN capture site in 26 patients (154± 138 sec, 18± 5 W), and upstream PN pacing was successfully applied in all patients. Out of 46 SVC isolations, including 5 redo sessions, PN injury occurred in 2 patients, who recovered spontaneously within 2 weeks. Conclusions: Upstream PN pacing is effective in completing SVC isolation safely and reducing the severity of PN injury.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Arrhythmia
Volume27
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Phrenic Nerve
Superior Vena Cava
Wounds and Injuries
Atrial Fibrillation
Catheter Ablation

Keywords

  • ablation
  • AF
  • phrenic nerve injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Electrical Isolation of Superior Vena Cava Using Upstream PN Pacing to Avoid Phrenic Nerve Injury. / Kimura, Takehiro; Takatsuki, Seiji; Nishiyama, Nobuhiro; Fukumoto, Kotaro; Aizawa, Yoshiyasu; Karube, Yukiko; Miyoshi, Shunichiro; Fukuda, Keiichi.

In: Journal of Arrhythmia, Vol. 27, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kimura, Takehiro ; Takatsuki, Seiji ; Nishiyama, Nobuhiro ; Fukumoto, Kotaro ; Aizawa, Yoshiyasu ; Karube, Yukiko ; Miyoshi, Shunichiro ; Fukuda, Keiichi. / Electrical Isolation of Superior Vena Cava Using Upstream PN Pacing to Avoid Phrenic Nerve Injury. In: Journal of Arrhythmia. 2011 ; Vol. 27.
@article{bbcecdba49da43e5ac77985c5b0f0012,
title = "Electrical Isolation of Superior Vena Cava Using Upstream PN Pacing to Avoid Phrenic Nerve Injury",
abstract = "Background: Phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a potential complication during superior vena cava (SVC) isolation to cure atrial fibrillation (AF). Avoiding radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery is safer but may lead to a failed isolation. High-output PN pacing above the ablation site, upstream PN pacing, is a promising technique to avoid PN injury. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of delivering RF energy at the site where high-output pacing captures PN. Methods and Results: SVC isolation was carried out in 41 drug-resistant AF patients. When high-output pacing (25 mA) from the ablation catheter captured PN, upstream PN pacing (cycle length: 1000-1500msec) was applied during RF delivery. RF energy was ceased upon the failure or weakness of diaphragmatic twitching. The feasibility of SVC isolation using upstream PN pacing was investigated. In all 41 patients, SVC isolation was successfully achieved. RF energy was delivered at the PN capture site in 26 patients (154± 138 sec, 18± 5 W), and upstream PN pacing was successfully applied in all patients. Out of 46 SVC isolations, including 5 redo sessions, PN injury occurred in 2 patients, who recovered spontaneously within 2 weeks. Conclusions: Upstream PN pacing is effective in completing SVC isolation safely and reducing the severity of PN injury.",
keywords = "ablation, AF, phrenic nerve injury",
author = "Takehiro Kimura and Seiji Takatsuki and Nobuhiro Nishiyama and Kotaro Fukumoto and Yoshiyasu Aizawa and Yukiko Karube and Shunichiro Miyoshi and Keiichi Fukuda",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.4020/jhrs.27.OP40_3",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
journal = "Journal of Arrhythmia",
issn = "1880-4276",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrical Isolation of Superior Vena Cava Using Upstream PN Pacing to Avoid Phrenic Nerve Injury

AU - Kimura, Takehiro

AU - Takatsuki, Seiji

AU - Nishiyama, Nobuhiro

AU - Fukumoto, Kotaro

AU - Aizawa, Yoshiyasu

AU - Karube, Yukiko

AU - Miyoshi, Shunichiro

AU - Fukuda, Keiichi

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: Phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a potential complication during superior vena cava (SVC) isolation to cure atrial fibrillation (AF). Avoiding radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery is safer but may lead to a failed isolation. High-output PN pacing above the ablation site, upstream PN pacing, is a promising technique to avoid PN injury. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of delivering RF energy at the site where high-output pacing captures PN. Methods and Results: SVC isolation was carried out in 41 drug-resistant AF patients. When high-output pacing (25 mA) from the ablation catheter captured PN, upstream PN pacing (cycle length: 1000-1500msec) was applied during RF delivery. RF energy was ceased upon the failure or weakness of diaphragmatic twitching. The feasibility of SVC isolation using upstream PN pacing was investigated. In all 41 patients, SVC isolation was successfully achieved. RF energy was delivered at the PN capture site in 26 patients (154± 138 sec, 18± 5 W), and upstream PN pacing was successfully applied in all patients. Out of 46 SVC isolations, including 5 redo sessions, PN injury occurred in 2 patients, who recovered spontaneously within 2 weeks. Conclusions: Upstream PN pacing is effective in completing SVC isolation safely and reducing the severity of PN injury.

AB - Background: Phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a potential complication during superior vena cava (SVC) isolation to cure atrial fibrillation (AF). Avoiding radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery is safer but may lead to a failed isolation. High-output PN pacing above the ablation site, upstream PN pacing, is a promising technique to avoid PN injury. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of delivering RF energy at the site where high-output pacing captures PN. Methods and Results: SVC isolation was carried out in 41 drug-resistant AF patients. When high-output pacing (25 mA) from the ablation catheter captured PN, upstream PN pacing (cycle length: 1000-1500msec) was applied during RF delivery. RF energy was ceased upon the failure or weakness of diaphragmatic twitching. The feasibility of SVC isolation using upstream PN pacing was investigated. In all 41 patients, SVC isolation was successfully achieved. RF energy was delivered at the PN capture site in 26 patients (154± 138 sec, 18± 5 W), and upstream PN pacing was successfully applied in all patients. Out of 46 SVC isolations, including 5 redo sessions, PN injury occurred in 2 patients, who recovered spontaneously within 2 weeks. Conclusions: Upstream PN pacing is effective in completing SVC isolation safely and reducing the severity of PN injury.

KW - ablation

KW - AF

KW - phrenic nerve injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009638346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009638346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4020/jhrs.27.OP40_3

DO - 10.4020/jhrs.27.OP40_3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85009638346

VL - 27

JO - Journal of Arrhythmia

JF - Journal of Arrhythmia

SN - 1880-4276

ER -