TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrical Isolation of Superior Vena Cava Using Upstream PN Pacing to Avoid Phrenic Nerve Injury
AU - Kimura, Takehiro
AU - Takatsuki, Seiji
AU - Nishiyama, Nobuhiro
AU - Fukumoto, Kotaro
AU - Aizawa, Yoshiyasu
AU - Karube, Yukiko
AU - Miyoshi, Shunichiro
AU - Fukuda, Keiichi
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Background: Phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a potential complication during superior vena cava (SVC) isolation to cure atrial fibrillation (AF). Avoiding radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery is safer but may lead to a failed isolation. High-output PN pacing above the ablation site, upstream PN pacing, is a promising technique to avoid PN injury. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of delivering RF energy at the site where high-output pacing captures PN. Methods and Results: SVC isolation was carried out in 41 drug-resistant AF patients. When high-output pacing (25 mA) from the ablation catheter captured PN, upstream PN pacing (cycle length: 1000-1500msec) was applied during RF delivery. RF energy was ceased upon the failure or weakness of diaphragmatic twitching. The feasibility of SVC isolation using upstream PN pacing was investigated. In all 41 patients, SVC isolation was successfully achieved. RF energy was delivered at the PN capture site in 26 patients (154± 138 sec, 18± 5 W), and upstream PN pacing was successfully applied in all patients. Out of 46 SVC isolations, including 5 redo sessions, PN injury occurred in 2 patients, who recovered spontaneously within 2 weeks. Conclusions: Upstream PN pacing is effective in completing SVC isolation safely and reducing the severity of PN injury.
AB - Background: Phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a potential complication during superior vena cava (SVC) isolation to cure atrial fibrillation (AF). Avoiding radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery is safer but may lead to a failed isolation. High-output PN pacing above the ablation site, upstream PN pacing, is a promising technique to avoid PN injury. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of delivering RF energy at the site where high-output pacing captures PN. Methods and Results: SVC isolation was carried out in 41 drug-resistant AF patients. When high-output pacing (25 mA) from the ablation catheter captured PN, upstream PN pacing (cycle length: 1000-1500msec) was applied during RF delivery. RF energy was ceased upon the failure or weakness of diaphragmatic twitching. The feasibility of SVC isolation using upstream PN pacing was investigated. In all 41 patients, SVC isolation was successfully achieved. RF energy was delivered at the PN capture site in 26 patients (154± 138 sec, 18± 5 W), and upstream PN pacing was successfully applied in all patients. Out of 46 SVC isolations, including 5 redo sessions, PN injury occurred in 2 patients, who recovered spontaneously within 2 weeks. Conclusions: Upstream PN pacing is effective in completing SVC isolation safely and reducing the severity of PN injury.
KW - AF
KW - ablation
KW - phrenic nerve injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009638346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009638346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4020/jhrs.27.OP40_3
DO - 10.4020/jhrs.27.OP40_3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85009638346
SN - 1880-4276
VL - 27
JO - Journal of Arrhythmia
JF - Journal of Arrhythmia
ER -