Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava using upstream phrenic pacing to avoid phrenic nerve injury

Takehiro Kimura, Seiji Takatsuki, Kotaro Fukumoto, Nobuhiro Nishiyama, Yuriko Sato, Yoshiyasu Aizawa, Yukiko Fukuda, Toshiaki Sato, Shunichiro Miyoshi, Keiichi Fukuda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a potential complication that can occur during superior vena cava (SVC) isolation to cure atrial fibrillation (AF). Avoiding radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery is the safer alternative but may result in failed isolation. High-output PN pacing above the ablation site (upstream PN pacing) to confirm whether the PN is intact is a promising technique to avoid PN injury. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of delivering RF energy at the site of capture of the right PN using upstream high-output pacing during electrical SVC isolation. Methods: SVC isolation was conducted in 41 drug-resistant AF patients. When high-output pacing (25 mA) from the distal tip of the ablation catheter captured the PN at the right atrial-SVC junction, upstream PN pacing (cycle length: 1000-1500 ms) was applied during RF delivery. The application of RF energy was stopped upon the failure or weakness of diaphragmatic twitching. The feasibility of SVC isolation using upstream PN pacing was investigated. Results: In all 41 patients, SVC isolation was successfully achieved. RF energy was delivered at the PN capture site in 26 patients (154 138 second, 18 5 W), and upstream PN pacing was successfully applied in all of the patients. Out of 46 SVC isolations, including five repeated sessions, PN injury occurred in one patient, who recovered spontaneously within 2 weeks. Conclusions: Upstream PN pacing may be effective for the safe completion of SVC isolation and to reduce the severity of PN injury. (PACE 2012; 35:1053-1060)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1053-1060
Number of pages8
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Sep

Fingerprint

Phrenic Nerve
Superior Vena Cava
Diaphragm
Wounds and Injuries
Atrial Fibrillation
Catheter Ablation

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • catheter ablation
  • phrenic nerve injury
  • phrenic pacing
  • SVC isolation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava using upstream phrenic pacing to avoid phrenic nerve injury. / Kimura, Takehiro; Takatsuki, Seiji; Fukumoto, Kotaro; Nishiyama, Nobuhiro; Sato, Yuriko; Aizawa, Yoshiyasu; Fukuda, Yukiko; Sato, Toshiaki; Miyoshi, Shunichiro; Fukuda, Keiichi.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 35, No. 9, 09.2012, p. 1053-1060.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kimura, Takehiro ; Takatsuki, Seiji ; Fukumoto, Kotaro ; Nishiyama, Nobuhiro ; Sato, Yuriko ; Aizawa, Yoshiyasu ; Fukuda, Yukiko ; Sato, Toshiaki ; Miyoshi, Shunichiro ; Fukuda, Keiichi. / Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava using upstream phrenic pacing to avoid phrenic nerve injury. In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2012 ; Vol. 35, No. 9. pp. 1053-1060.
@article{ca0b1e79f11e4203abdb82e03df91e1b,
title = "Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava using upstream phrenic pacing to avoid phrenic nerve injury",
abstract = "Background: Phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a potential complication that can occur during superior vena cava (SVC) isolation to cure atrial fibrillation (AF). Avoiding radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery is the safer alternative but may result in failed isolation. High-output PN pacing above the ablation site (upstream PN pacing) to confirm whether the PN is intact is a promising technique to avoid PN injury. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of delivering RF energy at the site of capture of the right PN using upstream high-output pacing during electrical SVC isolation. Methods: SVC isolation was conducted in 41 drug-resistant AF patients. When high-output pacing (25 mA) from the distal tip of the ablation catheter captured the PN at the right atrial-SVC junction, upstream PN pacing (cycle length: 1000-1500 ms) was applied during RF delivery. The application of RF energy was stopped upon the failure or weakness of diaphragmatic twitching. The feasibility of SVC isolation using upstream PN pacing was investigated. Results: In all 41 patients, SVC isolation was successfully achieved. RF energy was delivered at the PN capture site in 26 patients (154 138 second, 18 5 W), and upstream PN pacing was successfully applied in all of the patients. Out of 46 SVC isolations, including five repeated sessions, PN injury occurred in one patient, who recovered spontaneously within 2 weeks. Conclusions: Upstream PN pacing may be effective for the safe completion of SVC isolation and to reduce the severity of PN injury. (PACE 2012; 35:1053-1060)",
keywords = "atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, phrenic nerve injury, phrenic pacing, SVC isolation",
author = "Takehiro Kimura and Seiji Takatsuki and Kotaro Fukumoto and Nobuhiro Nishiyama and Yuriko Sato and Yoshiyasu Aizawa and Yukiko Fukuda and Toshiaki Sato and Shunichiro Miyoshi and Keiichi Fukuda",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03465.x",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1053--1060",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava using upstream phrenic pacing to avoid phrenic nerve injury

AU - Kimura, Takehiro

AU - Takatsuki, Seiji

AU - Fukumoto, Kotaro

AU - Nishiyama, Nobuhiro

AU - Sato, Yuriko

AU - Aizawa, Yoshiyasu

AU - Fukuda, Yukiko

AU - Sato, Toshiaki

AU - Miyoshi, Shunichiro

AU - Fukuda, Keiichi

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Background: Phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a potential complication that can occur during superior vena cava (SVC) isolation to cure atrial fibrillation (AF). Avoiding radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery is the safer alternative but may result in failed isolation. High-output PN pacing above the ablation site (upstream PN pacing) to confirm whether the PN is intact is a promising technique to avoid PN injury. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of delivering RF energy at the site of capture of the right PN using upstream high-output pacing during electrical SVC isolation. Methods: SVC isolation was conducted in 41 drug-resistant AF patients. When high-output pacing (25 mA) from the distal tip of the ablation catheter captured the PN at the right atrial-SVC junction, upstream PN pacing (cycle length: 1000-1500 ms) was applied during RF delivery. The application of RF energy was stopped upon the failure or weakness of diaphragmatic twitching. The feasibility of SVC isolation using upstream PN pacing was investigated. Results: In all 41 patients, SVC isolation was successfully achieved. RF energy was delivered at the PN capture site in 26 patients (154 138 second, 18 5 W), and upstream PN pacing was successfully applied in all of the patients. Out of 46 SVC isolations, including five repeated sessions, PN injury occurred in one patient, who recovered spontaneously within 2 weeks. Conclusions: Upstream PN pacing may be effective for the safe completion of SVC isolation and to reduce the severity of PN injury. (PACE 2012; 35:1053-1060)

AB - Background: Phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a potential complication that can occur during superior vena cava (SVC) isolation to cure atrial fibrillation (AF). Avoiding radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery is the safer alternative but may result in failed isolation. High-output PN pacing above the ablation site (upstream PN pacing) to confirm whether the PN is intact is a promising technique to avoid PN injury. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of delivering RF energy at the site of capture of the right PN using upstream high-output pacing during electrical SVC isolation. Methods: SVC isolation was conducted in 41 drug-resistant AF patients. When high-output pacing (25 mA) from the distal tip of the ablation catheter captured the PN at the right atrial-SVC junction, upstream PN pacing (cycle length: 1000-1500 ms) was applied during RF delivery. The application of RF energy was stopped upon the failure or weakness of diaphragmatic twitching. The feasibility of SVC isolation using upstream PN pacing was investigated. Results: In all 41 patients, SVC isolation was successfully achieved. RF energy was delivered at the PN capture site in 26 patients (154 138 second, 18 5 W), and upstream PN pacing was successfully applied in all of the patients. Out of 46 SVC isolations, including five repeated sessions, PN injury occurred in one patient, who recovered spontaneously within 2 weeks. Conclusions: Upstream PN pacing may be effective for the safe completion of SVC isolation and to reduce the severity of PN injury. (PACE 2012; 35:1053-1060)

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - catheter ablation

KW - phrenic nerve injury

KW - phrenic pacing

KW - SVC isolation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866175478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866175478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03465.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03465.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22845419

AN - SCOPUS:84866175478

VL - 35

SP - 1053

EP - 1060

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 9

ER -