Empowerment of local people for sustainable disaster mitigation: Experiences of developing countries

Kenji Okazaki, Rajib Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The mechanism of choice-making to reduce risk, i.e., how people perceive the degree of risk and how people are motivated to reduce the perceived risk, should be investigated. In this way, we may better understand how to empower local people for sustainable disaster mitigation. As a possible approach to achieving this objective, the experiences of the Risk Assessment Tools for Diagnosis of Urban Areas against Seismic Disasters (RADIUS) initiative and the Global Earthquake Safety Initiative (GESI) are introduced below and their lessons discussed. Both RADIUS and GESI methodologies stressed participation and ownership of the local people to reduce the earthquake risk in their cities. Motivating local decision makers and policymakers was the first step in this regard. Bringing local disaster managers in the process of disaster management was a challenging task, for which both projects had achieved significant success. Thus, the significant achievement of both projects was the ownership transfer of the risk management process to the local disaster managers. However, as argued in the first part of this article, there remains an unresolved issue, which is how to motivate local residents to take appropriate actions to reduce the risk at the individual level. The RADIUS and GESI methods are considered as the first step in this long-range and multidisciplinary process, where the involvement of local residents is important. Empowerment of local people through appropriate risk perception and motivation are the key elements for the success of this process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-14
Number of pages12
JournalRegional Development Dialogue
Volume24
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

empowerment
disaster
mitigation
developing world
developing country
natural disaster
earthquake
safety
experience
ownership
risk perception
disaster management
manager
resident
risk assessment
risk management
urban area
decision maker
methodology
participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development

Cite this

Empowerment of local people for sustainable disaster mitigation : Experiences of developing countries. / Okazaki, Kenji; Shaw, Rajib.

In: Regional Development Dialogue, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2003, p. 3-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7ed329270c9a40ff9529387fcdf5b7b3,
title = "Empowerment of local people for sustainable disaster mitigation: Experiences of developing countries",
abstract = "The mechanism of choice-making to reduce risk, i.e., how people perceive the degree of risk and how people are motivated to reduce the perceived risk, should be investigated. In this way, we may better understand how to empower local people for sustainable disaster mitigation. As a possible approach to achieving this objective, the experiences of the Risk Assessment Tools for Diagnosis of Urban Areas against Seismic Disasters (RADIUS) initiative and the Global Earthquake Safety Initiative (GESI) are introduced below and their lessons discussed. Both RADIUS and GESI methodologies stressed participation and ownership of the local people to reduce the earthquake risk in their cities. Motivating local decision makers and policymakers was the first step in this regard. Bringing local disaster managers in the process of disaster management was a challenging task, for which both projects had achieved significant success. Thus, the significant achievement of both projects was the ownership transfer of the risk management process to the local disaster managers. However, as argued in the first part of this article, there remains an unresolved issue, which is how to motivate local residents to take appropriate actions to reduce the risk at the individual level. The RADIUS and GESI methods are considered as the first step in this long-range and multidisciplinary process, where the involvement of local residents is important. Empowerment of local people through appropriate risk perception and motivation are the key elements for the success of this process.",
author = "Kenji Okazaki and Rajib Shaw",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "3--14",
journal = "Regional Development Dialogue",
issn = "0250-6505",
publisher = "United Nations Centre for Regional Development",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empowerment of local people for sustainable disaster mitigation

T2 - Experiences of developing countries

AU - Okazaki, Kenji

AU - Shaw, Rajib

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The mechanism of choice-making to reduce risk, i.e., how people perceive the degree of risk and how people are motivated to reduce the perceived risk, should be investigated. In this way, we may better understand how to empower local people for sustainable disaster mitigation. As a possible approach to achieving this objective, the experiences of the Risk Assessment Tools for Diagnosis of Urban Areas against Seismic Disasters (RADIUS) initiative and the Global Earthquake Safety Initiative (GESI) are introduced below and their lessons discussed. Both RADIUS and GESI methodologies stressed participation and ownership of the local people to reduce the earthquake risk in their cities. Motivating local decision makers and policymakers was the first step in this regard. Bringing local disaster managers in the process of disaster management was a challenging task, for which both projects had achieved significant success. Thus, the significant achievement of both projects was the ownership transfer of the risk management process to the local disaster managers. However, as argued in the first part of this article, there remains an unresolved issue, which is how to motivate local residents to take appropriate actions to reduce the risk at the individual level. The RADIUS and GESI methods are considered as the first step in this long-range and multidisciplinary process, where the involvement of local residents is important. Empowerment of local people through appropriate risk perception and motivation are the key elements for the success of this process.

AB - The mechanism of choice-making to reduce risk, i.e., how people perceive the degree of risk and how people are motivated to reduce the perceived risk, should be investigated. In this way, we may better understand how to empower local people for sustainable disaster mitigation. As a possible approach to achieving this objective, the experiences of the Risk Assessment Tools for Diagnosis of Urban Areas against Seismic Disasters (RADIUS) initiative and the Global Earthquake Safety Initiative (GESI) are introduced below and their lessons discussed. Both RADIUS and GESI methodologies stressed participation and ownership of the local people to reduce the earthquake risk in their cities. Motivating local decision makers and policymakers was the first step in this regard. Bringing local disaster managers in the process of disaster management was a challenging task, for which both projects had achieved significant success. Thus, the significant achievement of both projects was the ownership transfer of the risk management process to the local disaster managers. However, as argued in the first part of this article, there remains an unresolved issue, which is how to motivate local residents to take appropriate actions to reduce the risk at the individual level. The RADIUS and GESI methods are considered as the first step in this long-range and multidisciplinary process, where the involvement of local residents is important. Empowerment of local people through appropriate risk perception and motivation are the key elements for the success of this process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142072486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142072486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0142072486

VL - 24

SP - 3

EP - 14

JO - Regional Development Dialogue

JF - Regional Development Dialogue

SN - 0250-6505

IS - 1

ER -