Abstract
I have found some errors in Ref. 1 although the final results need not be changed. The equation, section, figure, and reference numbers below are the ones in the abovementioned paper. Equation (21) should be replaced by κ ≡ 2 + 1 / s_{c}(1 + s_{c}), (1) which means that the righthand side (rhs) of Eq. (21) should be replaced by the rhs divided by s_{c}. The term s_{c} ^{1} should be −1 in the first entry of Eq. (47), in the third line below Eq. (57), and on the rhs of Eq. (60). I should have deleted s_{c} in the first term on the rhs of Eq. (57) and in the parentheses on the rhs of Eq. (61). In the braces of Eq. (58), s_{c}= should be 1= and the lower bound of the integral should be unity. Other errors to be corrected are as follows. The description at the beginning of Sect. 4.1 is misleading; the terms other than p of Eq. (26) come from the first term of Eq. (5). The partial derivative in Eq. (31) should be replaced by the ordinary one. I missed mentioning the value of ξ_{0} used for Fig. A·1. It is 0.23 nm, which is adopted from Ref. 34. The term MΔ_{φ1} in Eq. (B·3) should be replaced by M_{φ1}Δ_{φ1}.
Original language  English 

Article number  098001 
Journal  Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 
Volume  86 
Issue number  9 
DOIs 

Publication status  Published  2017 Sep 15 
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
 Physics and Astronomy(all)
Cite this
Erratum : Fluctuation amplitude of a trapped rigid sphere immersed in a nearcritical binary fluid mixture within the regime of the Gaussian model (J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. (2016) 85 (044401) DOI: 10.7566/JPSJ.85.044401). / Fujitani, Youhei.
In: Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, Vol. 86, No. 9, 098001, 15.09.2017.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
}
TY  JOUR
T1  Erratum
T2  Fluctuation amplitude of a trapped rigid sphere immersed in a nearcritical binary fluid mixture within the regime of the Gaussian model (J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. (2016) 85 (044401) DOI: 10.7566/JPSJ.85.044401)
AU  Fujitani, Youhei
PY  2017/9/15
Y1  2017/9/15
N2  I have found some errors in Ref. 1 although the final results need not be changed. The equation, section, figure, and reference numbers below are the ones in the abovementioned paper. Equation (21) should be replaced by κ ≡ 2 + 1 / sc(1 + sc), (1) which means that the righthand side (rhs) of Eq. (21) should be replaced by the rhs divided by sc. The term sc 1 should be −1 in the first entry of Eq. (47), in the third line below Eq. (57), and on the rhs of Eq. (60). I should have deleted sc in the first term on the rhs of Eq. (57) and in the parentheses on the rhs of Eq. (61). In the braces of Eq. (58), sc= should be 1= and the lower bound of the integral should be unity. Other errors to be corrected are as follows. The description at the beginning of Sect. 4.1 is misleading; the terms other than p of Eq. (26) come from the first term of Eq. (5). The partial derivative in Eq. (31) should be replaced by the ordinary one. I missed mentioning the value of ξ0 used for Fig. A·1. It is 0.23 nm, which is adopted from Ref. 34. The term MΔφ1 in Eq. (B·3) should be replaced by Mφ1Δφ1.
AB  I have found some errors in Ref. 1 although the final results need not be changed. The equation, section, figure, and reference numbers below are the ones in the abovementioned paper. Equation (21) should be replaced by κ ≡ 2 + 1 / sc(1 + sc), (1) which means that the righthand side (rhs) of Eq. (21) should be replaced by the rhs divided by sc. The term sc 1 should be −1 in the first entry of Eq. (47), in the third line below Eq. (57), and on the rhs of Eq. (60). I should have deleted sc in the first term on the rhs of Eq. (57) and in the parentheses on the rhs of Eq. (61). In the braces of Eq. (58), sc= should be 1= and the lower bound of the integral should be unity. Other errors to be corrected are as follows. The description at the beginning of Sect. 4.1 is misleading; the terms other than p of Eq. (26) come from the first term of Eq. (5). The partial derivative in Eq. (31) should be replaced by the ordinary one. I missed mentioning the value of ξ0 used for Fig. A·1. It is 0.23 nm, which is adopted from Ref. 34. The term MΔφ1 in Eq. (B·3) should be replaced by Mφ1Δφ1.
UR  http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031032258&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR  http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031032258&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2  10.7566/JPSJ.86.098001
DO  10.7566/JPSJ.86.098001
M3  Comment/debate
VL  86
JO  Journal of the Physical Society of Japan
JF  Journal of the Physical Society of Japan
SN  00319015
IS  9
M1  098001
ER 