Evaluation of Clinical Usefulness of a Medical Monitor Equipped With an Organic Electroluminescence Panel in Comparison With Liquid Crystal Display Monitors

Fumio Kataoka, Hiroyuki Nomura, Yuya Nogami, Hirokazu Arima, Yoshiko Sawano, Kouji Banno, Takuma Fujii, Daisuke Aoki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)


The medical liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor is a conventionally used imaging device for diagnosis and during endoscopic surgery. Recently, a medical organic electroluminescence panel, the organic light-emitting diode (OLED) monitor, was made available commercially. The advantages of the OLED monitor include good color reproducibility, high contrast, and high video responsiveness. In this nonclinical study, we compared the clinical usefulness and image quality of the OLED monitor and those of the LCD monitor using videos of gynecologic endoscopic surgeries. Monitors were set for blind evaluation. Five evaluators with varying experience in endoscopic surgery evaluated 21 surgery videos played simultaneously on an OLED monitor and two LCD monitors for 2 to 3 minutes twice. Evaluators judged 13 clinical usefulness indices and 11 image quality indices using a 5-point scale (1, very good; 5, very poor) for each video. The mean scores of clinical usefulness indices of the OLED monitor and the LCD monitors 1 and 2 were 2.2 to 2.7, 2.1 to 3.3, and 3.0 to 3.2, respectively. Of seven indices measured, five including motion response, the ability to differentiate organs, recognize lesions, and reproduce actual images, and the general impression of picture quality were statistically superior with use of the OLED monitor compared with the LCD monitor 1, and two including ability to distinguish blood vessels and the ureters were statistically superior with use of the LCD monitor 1 compared with the OLED monitor. The mean scores of image quality indices of the OLED monitor and the LCD monitors 1 and 2 were 1.8 to 3.2, 2.6 to 3.6, and 2.8 to 4.0, respectively. Each index of the OLED monitor was superior to or comparable with those of the LCD monitors. We conclude that the OLED monitor is superior to the LCD monitors insofar as several video presentation characteristics required in gynecologic endoscopic surgery. These findings suggest that the OLED monitor is expected to contribute detailed assessment of organs and the operative field.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)522-528
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jul 1



  • Liquid crystal display
  • Medical monitor
  • Organic light-emitted diode

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this