Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty

A comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey

Satoko Nagata, Misuzu F. Gregg, Yuko Miki, Azusa Arimoto, Sachiyo Murashima, Mi Ja Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evaluation of doctoral education in nursing is needed with the rapid increase in doctoral nursing programs in Japan. This study aimed to compare the evaluations of doctoral nursing education by students, graduates, and faculty. All 46 doctoral nursing programs in Japan were target settings. 127 students who had been in the doctoral program, 24 graduates and 87 faculty members had responded to the survey. A questionnaire with 17 items for program evaluation, 12 items for faculty evaluation, 9 items for resource evaluation, and 3 for overall evaluations was distributed in November and December 2008. Responses to 1 program evaluation item, 2 faculty evaluation items and 4 resource evaluation items indicated significant differences among evaluators. While 79.2% of graduates responded positively that the number of faculty members was sufficient to facilitate learning, only 36.1% of faculty members and 49.6% of students responded affirmatively. Graduates' ratings were the most positive and faculty members were the least positive, especially for infrastructure or equipment such as libraries, computers, and the number of technical and support staff. The significant differences among the evaluators suggested that having evaluators in various roles is important to evaluate the quality of doctoral nursing education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-367
Number of pages7
JournalNurse Education Today
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 May

Fingerprint

Nursing Education
Japan
nursing
Cross-Sectional Studies
graduate
Students
questionnaire
evaluation
education
student
Program Evaluation
Nursing
Nursing Students
Surveys and Questionnaires
Libraries
resources
Learning
Equipment and Supplies
rating
infrastructure

Keywords

  • Comparative research
  • Doctoral nursing education
  • Evaluation
  • Japan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty : A comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. / Nagata, Satoko; Gregg, Misuzu F.; Miki, Yuko; Arimoto, Azusa; Murashima, Sachiyo; Kim, Mi Ja.

In: Nurse Education Today, Vol. 32, No. 4, 05.2012, p. 361-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nagata, Satoko ; Gregg, Misuzu F. ; Miki, Yuko ; Arimoto, Azusa ; Murashima, Sachiyo ; Kim, Mi Ja. / Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty : A comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. In: Nurse Education Today. 2012 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 361-367.
@article{f273e2c73b454ab381f33f21b51f3d77,
title = "Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty: A comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey",
abstract = "Evaluation of doctoral education in nursing is needed with the rapid increase in doctoral nursing programs in Japan. This study aimed to compare the evaluations of doctoral nursing education by students, graduates, and faculty. All 46 doctoral nursing programs in Japan were target settings. 127 students who had been in the doctoral program, 24 graduates and 87 faculty members had responded to the survey. A questionnaire with 17 items for program evaluation, 12 items for faculty evaluation, 9 items for resource evaluation, and 3 for overall evaluations was distributed in November and December 2008. Responses to 1 program evaluation item, 2 faculty evaluation items and 4 resource evaluation items indicated significant differences among evaluators. While 79.2{\%} of graduates responded positively that the number of faculty members was sufficient to facilitate learning, only 36.1{\%} of faculty members and 49.6{\%} of students responded affirmatively. Graduates' ratings were the most positive and faculty members were the least positive, especially for infrastructure or equipment such as libraries, computers, and the number of technical and support staff. The significant differences among the evaluators suggested that having evaluators in various roles is important to evaluate the quality of doctoral nursing education.",
keywords = "Comparative research, Doctoral nursing education, Evaluation, Japan",
author = "Satoko Nagata and Gregg, {Misuzu F.} and Yuko Miki and Azusa Arimoto and Sachiyo Murashima and Kim, {Mi Ja}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.019",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "361--367",
journal = "Nurse Education Today",
issn = "0260-6917",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty

T2 - A comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey

AU - Nagata, Satoko

AU - Gregg, Misuzu F.

AU - Miki, Yuko

AU - Arimoto, Azusa

AU - Murashima, Sachiyo

AU - Kim, Mi Ja

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Evaluation of doctoral education in nursing is needed with the rapid increase in doctoral nursing programs in Japan. This study aimed to compare the evaluations of doctoral nursing education by students, graduates, and faculty. All 46 doctoral nursing programs in Japan were target settings. 127 students who had been in the doctoral program, 24 graduates and 87 faculty members had responded to the survey. A questionnaire with 17 items for program evaluation, 12 items for faculty evaluation, 9 items for resource evaluation, and 3 for overall evaluations was distributed in November and December 2008. Responses to 1 program evaluation item, 2 faculty evaluation items and 4 resource evaluation items indicated significant differences among evaluators. While 79.2% of graduates responded positively that the number of faculty members was sufficient to facilitate learning, only 36.1% of faculty members and 49.6% of students responded affirmatively. Graduates' ratings were the most positive and faculty members were the least positive, especially for infrastructure or equipment such as libraries, computers, and the number of technical and support staff. The significant differences among the evaluators suggested that having evaluators in various roles is important to evaluate the quality of doctoral nursing education.

AB - Evaluation of doctoral education in nursing is needed with the rapid increase in doctoral nursing programs in Japan. This study aimed to compare the evaluations of doctoral nursing education by students, graduates, and faculty. All 46 doctoral nursing programs in Japan were target settings. 127 students who had been in the doctoral program, 24 graduates and 87 faculty members had responded to the survey. A questionnaire with 17 items for program evaluation, 12 items for faculty evaluation, 9 items for resource evaluation, and 3 for overall evaluations was distributed in November and December 2008. Responses to 1 program evaluation item, 2 faculty evaluation items and 4 resource evaluation items indicated significant differences among evaluators. While 79.2% of graduates responded positively that the number of faculty members was sufficient to facilitate learning, only 36.1% of faculty members and 49.6% of students responded affirmatively. Graduates' ratings were the most positive and faculty members were the least positive, especially for infrastructure or equipment such as libraries, computers, and the number of technical and support staff. The significant differences among the evaluators suggested that having evaluators in various roles is important to evaluate the quality of doctoral nursing education.

KW - Comparative research

KW - Doctoral nursing education

KW - Evaluation

KW - Japan

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859633225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859633225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.019

DO - 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.019

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 361

EP - 367

JO - Nurse Education Today

JF - Nurse Education Today

SN - 0260-6917

IS - 4

ER -