Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs by doctoral students in Japan

Cross-sectional questionnaire survey

Yuko Miki, Misuzu F. Gregg, Azusa Arimoto, Satoko Nagata, Sachiyo Murashima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the current state and issues of doctoral nursing programs from the perspective of recipients of the educational process. Methods: All 46 doctoral nursing programs in Japan in 2008 were asked to participate in this study and 28 programs agreed to participate. The questionnaire had 3 sections that evaluated the quality of doctoral education, which are 17 items on the program features, 12 items on the quality of faculty, and 9 items on resources. Results: The questionnaire was distributed to 304 graduate students and 127 students returned by mail. Most of the students agreed that the program goal and curriculum were consistent with the philosophy and mission of the university. The quality of the faculty and of the resources, such as library and computing facilities, were highly rated, while faculty mentorship and support staff for student research were viewed as areas for improvement. Only 30% of the students reported that a periodic assessment of the doctoral program was available in the university, and even when such an assessment did exist, students and graduates were not often involved in the program evaluation. Conclusions: To improve the quality of doctoral nursing education in Japan, there is an urgent need for faculty development and the provision of research support services for faculty and students including more technical and support staff. Furthermore, it is imperative to conduct periodic evaluation of doctoral nursing programs in Japan.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-168
Number of pages9
JournalJapan Journal of Nursing Science
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Dec

Fingerprint

Nursing Evaluation Research
Japan
Cross-Sectional Studies
Students
Nursing
Mentors
Nursing Education
Program Evaluation
Postal Service
Surveys and Questionnaires
Curriculum
Libraries
Education

Keywords

  • Doctoral nursing education
  • Evaluation
  • Graduate students
  • Japan
  • Questionnaire survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Research and Theory

Cite this

Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs by doctoral students in Japan : Cross-sectional questionnaire survey. / Miki, Yuko; Gregg, Misuzu F.; Arimoto, Azusa; Nagata, Satoko; Murashima, Sachiyo.

In: Japan Journal of Nursing Science, Vol. 9, No. 2, 12.2012, p. 160-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miki, Yuko ; Gregg, Misuzu F. ; Arimoto, Azusa ; Nagata, Satoko ; Murashima, Sachiyo. / Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs by doctoral students in Japan : Cross-sectional questionnaire survey. In: Japan Journal of Nursing Science. 2012 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 160-168.
@article{fa779661eb954689aecc0401fafe1ce4,
title = "Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs by doctoral students in Japan: Cross-sectional questionnaire survey",
abstract = "Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the current state and issues of doctoral nursing programs from the perspective of recipients of the educational process. Methods: All 46 doctoral nursing programs in Japan in 2008 were asked to participate in this study and 28 programs agreed to participate. The questionnaire had 3 sections that evaluated the quality of doctoral education, which are 17 items on the program features, 12 items on the quality of faculty, and 9 items on resources. Results: The questionnaire was distributed to 304 graduate students and 127 students returned by mail. Most of the students agreed that the program goal and curriculum were consistent with the philosophy and mission of the university. The quality of the faculty and of the resources, such as library and computing facilities, were highly rated, while faculty mentorship and support staff for student research were viewed as areas for improvement. Only 30{\%} of the students reported that a periodic assessment of the doctoral program was available in the university, and even when such an assessment did exist, students and graduates were not often involved in the program evaluation. Conclusions: To improve the quality of doctoral nursing education in Japan, there is an urgent need for faculty development and the provision of research support services for faculty and students including more technical and support staff. Furthermore, it is imperative to conduct periodic evaluation of doctoral nursing programs in Japan.",
keywords = "Doctoral nursing education, Evaluation, Graduate students, Japan, Questionnaire survey",
author = "Yuko Miki and Gregg, {Misuzu F.} and Azusa Arimoto and Satoko Nagata and Sachiyo Murashima",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1742-7924.2011.00196.x",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "160--168",
journal = "Japan Journal of Nursing Science",
issn = "1742-7932",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Asia",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs by doctoral students in Japan

T2 - Cross-sectional questionnaire survey

AU - Miki, Yuko

AU - Gregg, Misuzu F.

AU - Arimoto, Azusa

AU - Nagata, Satoko

AU - Murashima, Sachiyo

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the current state and issues of doctoral nursing programs from the perspective of recipients of the educational process. Methods: All 46 doctoral nursing programs in Japan in 2008 were asked to participate in this study and 28 programs agreed to participate. The questionnaire had 3 sections that evaluated the quality of doctoral education, which are 17 items on the program features, 12 items on the quality of faculty, and 9 items on resources. Results: The questionnaire was distributed to 304 graduate students and 127 students returned by mail. Most of the students agreed that the program goal and curriculum were consistent with the philosophy and mission of the university. The quality of the faculty and of the resources, such as library and computing facilities, were highly rated, while faculty mentorship and support staff for student research were viewed as areas for improvement. Only 30% of the students reported that a periodic assessment of the doctoral program was available in the university, and even when such an assessment did exist, students and graduates were not often involved in the program evaluation. Conclusions: To improve the quality of doctoral nursing education in Japan, there is an urgent need for faculty development and the provision of research support services for faculty and students including more technical and support staff. Furthermore, it is imperative to conduct periodic evaluation of doctoral nursing programs in Japan.

AB - Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the current state and issues of doctoral nursing programs from the perspective of recipients of the educational process. Methods: All 46 doctoral nursing programs in Japan in 2008 were asked to participate in this study and 28 programs agreed to participate. The questionnaire had 3 sections that evaluated the quality of doctoral education, which are 17 items on the program features, 12 items on the quality of faculty, and 9 items on resources. Results: The questionnaire was distributed to 304 graduate students and 127 students returned by mail. Most of the students agreed that the program goal and curriculum were consistent with the philosophy and mission of the university. The quality of the faculty and of the resources, such as library and computing facilities, were highly rated, while faculty mentorship and support staff for student research were viewed as areas for improvement. Only 30% of the students reported that a periodic assessment of the doctoral program was available in the university, and even when such an assessment did exist, students and graduates were not often involved in the program evaluation. Conclusions: To improve the quality of doctoral nursing education in Japan, there is an urgent need for faculty development and the provision of research support services for faculty and students including more technical and support staff. Furthermore, it is imperative to conduct periodic evaluation of doctoral nursing programs in Japan.

KW - Doctoral nursing education

KW - Evaluation

KW - Graduate students

KW - Japan

KW - Questionnaire survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870302460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870302460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2011.00196.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2011.00196.x

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 160

EP - 168

JO - Japan Journal of Nursing Science

JF - Japan Journal of Nursing Science

SN - 1742-7932

IS - 2

ER -