Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images

Hiroaki Nomori, Kenichi Watanabe, Takashi Ohtsuka, Tsuguo Naruke, Keiichi Suemasu, Kimiichi Uno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

234 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: While pulmonary nodules can be substantially divided into solid and ground-glass opacity (GGO) ones on CT image, they have different biological natures which could cause false positive or false negative to diagnose malignancy on positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). To determine the effectiveness of PET for small pulmonary nodules, the nodules were classified into solid and GGO ones, of which results were compared with the data of PET scans. The lower limit size of nodules for PET imaging was also evaluated. Methods: Prospective FDG-PET scans were undertaken for 136 non-calcified nodules less than 3 cm in diameter. CT density histograms were made for each nodule to classify into solid and GGO ones. Results: Eighty-one nodules were malignant and 55 were benign. All of the 20 nodules less than 1 cm in diameter (n=8 in malignant, n=12 in benign), were negative on PET regardless of the histology. In the 116 nodules 1-3 cm in diameter (n=73 in malignant, n=43 in benign), there were 15 false negative and 15 false positive nodules, with a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 65%. CT density histograms showed 101 solid nodules (n=63 in malignant, n=38 in benign) and 15 GGO nodules (n=10 in malignant, n=5 in benign). All of the 10 malignant nodules with GGO images were histologically well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and 9 of them (90%) were false negative on PET. Four of the 5 (80%) benign nodules with GGO images were focal pneumonia with well-preserved air spaces, causing false positive on PET. Sensitivity and specificity for nodules with GGO images were 10 and 20%, respectively, which were significantly lower than 90 and 71% for nodules with solid images (P<0.001). Conclusion: Pulmonary nodules which are less than 1 cm in size or show GGO images on CT cannot be evaluated accurately by PET.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-27
Number of pages9
JournalLung Cancer
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Jul
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Glass
Lung
Positron-Emission Tomography
Sensitivity and Specificity
Pneumonia
Histology
Adenocarcinoma
Air

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • FDG-PET
  • Ground-glass opacity
  • Lung cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Cite this

Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images. / Nomori, Hiroaki; Watanabe, Kenichi; Ohtsuka, Takashi; Naruke, Tsuguo; Suemasu, Keiichi; Uno, Kimiichi.

In: Lung Cancer, Vol. 45, No. 1, 07.2004, p. 19-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nomori, Hiroaki ; Watanabe, Kenichi ; Ohtsuka, Takashi ; Naruke, Tsuguo ; Suemasu, Keiichi ; Uno, Kimiichi. / Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images. In: Lung Cancer. 2004 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 19-27.
@article{c549eae82c8346a8820530216641d78b,
title = "Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images",
abstract = "Background: While pulmonary nodules can be substantially divided into solid and ground-glass opacity (GGO) ones on CT image, they have different biological natures which could cause false positive or false negative to diagnose malignancy on positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). To determine the effectiveness of PET for small pulmonary nodules, the nodules were classified into solid and GGO ones, of which results were compared with the data of PET scans. The lower limit size of nodules for PET imaging was also evaluated. Methods: Prospective FDG-PET scans were undertaken for 136 non-calcified nodules less than 3 cm in diameter. CT density histograms were made for each nodule to classify into solid and GGO ones. Results: Eighty-one nodules were malignant and 55 were benign. All of the 20 nodules less than 1 cm in diameter (n=8 in malignant, n=12 in benign), were negative on PET regardless of the histology. In the 116 nodules 1-3 cm in diameter (n=73 in malignant, n=43 in benign), there were 15 false negative and 15 false positive nodules, with a sensitivity of 79{\%} and specificity of 65{\%}. CT density histograms showed 101 solid nodules (n=63 in malignant, n=38 in benign) and 15 GGO nodules (n=10 in malignant, n=5 in benign). All of the 10 malignant nodules with GGO images were histologically well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and 9 of them (90{\%}) were false negative on PET. Four of the 5 (80{\%}) benign nodules with GGO images were focal pneumonia with well-preserved air spaces, causing false positive on PET. Sensitivity and specificity for nodules with GGO images were 10 and 20{\%}, respectively, which were significantly lower than 90 and 71{\%} for nodules with solid images (P<0.001). Conclusion: Pulmonary nodules which are less than 1 cm in size or show GGO images on CT cannot be evaluated accurately by PET.",
keywords = "Computed tomography, FDG-PET, Ground-glass opacity, Lung cancer",
author = "Hiroaki Nomori and Kenichi Watanabe and Takashi Ohtsuka and Tsuguo Naruke and Keiichi Suemasu and Kimiichi Uno",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.01.009",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "19--27",
journal = "Lung Cancer",
issn = "0169-5002",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images

AU - Nomori, Hiroaki

AU - Watanabe, Kenichi

AU - Ohtsuka, Takashi

AU - Naruke, Tsuguo

AU - Suemasu, Keiichi

AU - Uno, Kimiichi

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - Background: While pulmonary nodules can be substantially divided into solid and ground-glass opacity (GGO) ones on CT image, they have different biological natures which could cause false positive or false negative to diagnose malignancy on positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). To determine the effectiveness of PET for small pulmonary nodules, the nodules were classified into solid and GGO ones, of which results were compared with the data of PET scans. The lower limit size of nodules for PET imaging was also evaluated. Methods: Prospective FDG-PET scans were undertaken for 136 non-calcified nodules less than 3 cm in diameter. CT density histograms were made for each nodule to classify into solid and GGO ones. Results: Eighty-one nodules were malignant and 55 were benign. All of the 20 nodules less than 1 cm in diameter (n=8 in malignant, n=12 in benign), were negative on PET regardless of the histology. In the 116 nodules 1-3 cm in diameter (n=73 in malignant, n=43 in benign), there were 15 false negative and 15 false positive nodules, with a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 65%. CT density histograms showed 101 solid nodules (n=63 in malignant, n=38 in benign) and 15 GGO nodules (n=10 in malignant, n=5 in benign). All of the 10 malignant nodules with GGO images were histologically well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and 9 of them (90%) were false negative on PET. Four of the 5 (80%) benign nodules with GGO images were focal pneumonia with well-preserved air spaces, causing false positive on PET. Sensitivity and specificity for nodules with GGO images were 10 and 20%, respectively, which were significantly lower than 90 and 71% for nodules with solid images (P<0.001). Conclusion: Pulmonary nodules which are less than 1 cm in size or show GGO images on CT cannot be evaluated accurately by PET.

AB - Background: While pulmonary nodules can be substantially divided into solid and ground-glass opacity (GGO) ones on CT image, they have different biological natures which could cause false positive or false negative to diagnose malignancy on positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). To determine the effectiveness of PET for small pulmonary nodules, the nodules were classified into solid and GGO ones, of which results were compared with the data of PET scans. The lower limit size of nodules for PET imaging was also evaluated. Methods: Prospective FDG-PET scans were undertaken for 136 non-calcified nodules less than 3 cm in diameter. CT density histograms were made for each nodule to classify into solid and GGO ones. Results: Eighty-one nodules were malignant and 55 were benign. All of the 20 nodules less than 1 cm in diameter (n=8 in malignant, n=12 in benign), were negative on PET regardless of the histology. In the 116 nodules 1-3 cm in diameter (n=73 in malignant, n=43 in benign), there were 15 false negative and 15 false positive nodules, with a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 65%. CT density histograms showed 101 solid nodules (n=63 in malignant, n=38 in benign) and 15 GGO nodules (n=10 in malignant, n=5 in benign). All of the 10 malignant nodules with GGO images were histologically well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and 9 of them (90%) were false negative on PET. Four of the 5 (80%) benign nodules with GGO images were focal pneumonia with well-preserved air spaces, causing false positive on PET. Sensitivity and specificity for nodules with GGO images were 10 and 20%, respectively, which were significantly lower than 90 and 71% for nodules with solid images (P<0.001). Conclusion: Pulmonary nodules which are less than 1 cm in size or show GGO images on CT cannot be evaluated accurately by PET.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - FDG-PET

KW - Ground-glass opacity

KW - Lung cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942547509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942547509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.01.009

DO - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.01.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 15196730

AN - SCOPUS:2942547509

VL - 45

SP - 19

EP - 27

JO - Lung Cancer

JF - Lung Cancer

SN - 0169-5002

IS - 1

ER -