Evaluation of the control banding method - Comparison with measurement-based comprehensive risk assessment

Haruo Hashimoto, Toshiaki Goto, Nobutoyo Nakachi, Hidetaka Suzuki, Toru Takebayashi, Shigeyuki Kajiki, Koji Mori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The control banding method, or "control banding", is a simplified risk assessment system for chemical handling tasks. This system is supposed to provide assessment results of reasonable quality without expert involvement. The objective of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of control banding judgment on the basis of workplace safety. A common approach for assessing workplace risk, which is called "comprehensive risk assessment" in this study, is to measure workers' exposure and compare it with relevant occupational exposure limits. Risk assessment was performed with control banding (COSHH Essentials, UK) at 12 workplaces of a petroleum company in Japan, where health risks had already been assessed separately through comprehensive risk assessment by experts and control technologies implemented accordingly. The obtained control banding judgments were then examined with regard to their adequacy by comparing them with existing control technologies. There was majority of cases (seven) where judgments by control banding were identified as "over-controlled"; there was no judgments identified as "under-controlled". Control banding also requested the seeking of expert advice in the majority of cases (eight). Thus, it was demonstrated that control banding tends to provide safe-sided judgment. A possible interpretation of this is that control banding is inherently designed to secure workplace safety by compensating for its insufficient exposure information with safe-sided judgment criteria and by requiring experts' intervention in high-risk cases. Control banding could be widely and effectively utilized in Japan, especially by employers in small enterprises, provided that the above characteristics are pre-acknowledged and health experts are made available. To this aim, it is essential to develop new local health experts and establish institutional mechanisms for facilitating employers' access to expert advice. It should however be noted that the number of workplaces evaluated in this study was small.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)482-492
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Occupational Health
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Nov

Fingerprint

Risk assessment
Workplace
Japan
Health
Technology
Safety
Petroleum
Occupational Exposure
Health risks
Industry

Keywords

  • Chemicals
  • Control
  • Control banding
  • COSHH Essentials
  • Expert
  • Exposure
  • Hazard
  • Risk assessment
  • Small enterprises

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Evaluation of the control banding method - Comparison with measurement-based comprehensive risk assessment. / Hashimoto, Haruo; Goto, Toshiaki; Nakachi, Nobutoyo; Suzuki, Hidetaka; Takebayashi, Toru; Kajiki, Shigeyuki; Mori, Koji.

In: Journal of Occupational Health, Vol. 49, No. 6, 11.2007, p. 482-492.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hashimoto, Haruo ; Goto, Toshiaki ; Nakachi, Nobutoyo ; Suzuki, Hidetaka ; Takebayashi, Toru ; Kajiki, Shigeyuki ; Mori, Koji. / Evaluation of the control banding method - Comparison with measurement-based comprehensive risk assessment. In: Journal of Occupational Health. 2007 ; Vol. 49, No. 6. pp. 482-492.
@article{6f1cf7e77d8c4ae08c3c5e56713036ef,
title = "Evaluation of the control banding method - Comparison with measurement-based comprehensive risk assessment",
abstract = "The control banding method, or {"}control banding{"}, is a simplified risk assessment system for chemical handling tasks. This system is supposed to provide assessment results of reasonable quality without expert involvement. The objective of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of control banding judgment on the basis of workplace safety. A common approach for assessing workplace risk, which is called {"}comprehensive risk assessment{"} in this study, is to measure workers' exposure and compare it with relevant occupational exposure limits. Risk assessment was performed with control banding (COSHH Essentials, UK) at 12 workplaces of a petroleum company in Japan, where health risks had already been assessed separately through comprehensive risk assessment by experts and control technologies implemented accordingly. The obtained control banding judgments were then examined with regard to their adequacy by comparing them with existing control technologies. There was majority of cases (seven) where judgments by control banding were identified as {"}over-controlled{"}; there was no judgments identified as {"}under-controlled{"}. Control banding also requested the seeking of expert advice in the majority of cases (eight). Thus, it was demonstrated that control banding tends to provide safe-sided judgment. A possible interpretation of this is that control banding is inherently designed to secure workplace safety by compensating for its insufficient exposure information with safe-sided judgment criteria and by requiring experts' intervention in high-risk cases. Control banding could be widely and effectively utilized in Japan, especially by employers in small enterprises, provided that the above characteristics are pre-acknowledged and health experts are made available. To this aim, it is essential to develop new local health experts and establish institutional mechanisms for facilitating employers' access to expert advice. It should however be noted that the number of workplaces evaluated in this study was small.",
keywords = "Chemicals, Control, Control banding, COSHH Essentials, Expert, Exposure, Hazard, Risk assessment, Small enterprises",
author = "Haruo Hashimoto and Toshiaki Goto and Nobutoyo Nakachi and Hidetaka Suzuki and Toru Takebayashi and Shigeyuki Kajiki and Koji Mori",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1539/joh.49.482",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "482--492",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Health",
issn = "1341-9145",
publisher = "Japan Society for Occupational Health",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the control banding method - Comparison with measurement-based comprehensive risk assessment

AU - Hashimoto, Haruo

AU - Goto, Toshiaki

AU - Nakachi, Nobutoyo

AU - Suzuki, Hidetaka

AU - Takebayashi, Toru

AU - Kajiki, Shigeyuki

AU - Mori, Koji

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - The control banding method, or "control banding", is a simplified risk assessment system for chemical handling tasks. This system is supposed to provide assessment results of reasonable quality without expert involvement. The objective of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of control banding judgment on the basis of workplace safety. A common approach for assessing workplace risk, which is called "comprehensive risk assessment" in this study, is to measure workers' exposure and compare it with relevant occupational exposure limits. Risk assessment was performed with control banding (COSHH Essentials, UK) at 12 workplaces of a petroleum company in Japan, where health risks had already been assessed separately through comprehensive risk assessment by experts and control technologies implemented accordingly. The obtained control banding judgments were then examined with regard to their adequacy by comparing them with existing control technologies. There was majority of cases (seven) where judgments by control banding were identified as "over-controlled"; there was no judgments identified as "under-controlled". Control banding also requested the seeking of expert advice in the majority of cases (eight). Thus, it was demonstrated that control banding tends to provide safe-sided judgment. A possible interpretation of this is that control banding is inherently designed to secure workplace safety by compensating for its insufficient exposure information with safe-sided judgment criteria and by requiring experts' intervention in high-risk cases. Control banding could be widely and effectively utilized in Japan, especially by employers in small enterprises, provided that the above characteristics are pre-acknowledged and health experts are made available. To this aim, it is essential to develop new local health experts and establish institutional mechanisms for facilitating employers' access to expert advice. It should however be noted that the number of workplaces evaluated in this study was small.

AB - The control banding method, or "control banding", is a simplified risk assessment system for chemical handling tasks. This system is supposed to provide assessment results of reasonable quality without expert involvement. The objective of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of control banding judgment on the basis of workplace safety. A common approach for assessing workplace risk, which is called "comprehensive risk assessment" in this study, is to measure workers' exposure and compare it with relevant occupational exposure limits. Risk assessment was performed with control banding (COSHH Essentials, UK) at 12 workplaces of a petroleum company in Japan, where health risks had already been assessed separately through comprehensive risk assessment by experts and control technologies implemented accordingly. The obtained control banding judgments were then examined with regard to their adequacy by comparing them with existing control technologies. There was majority of cases (seven) where judgments by control banding were identified as "over-controlled"; there was no judgments identified as "under-controlled". Control banding also requested the seeking of expert advice in the majority of cases (eight). Thus, it was demonstrated that control banding tends to provide safe-sided judgment. A possible interpretation of this is that control banding is inherently designed to secure workplace safety by compensating for its insufficient exposure information with safe-sided judgment criteria and by requiring experts' intervention in high-risk cases. Control banding could be widely and effectively utilized in Japan, especially by employers in small enterprises, provided that the above characteristics are pre-acknowledged and health experts are made available. To this aim, it is essential to develop new local health experts and establish institutional mechanisms for facilitating employers' access to expert advice. It should however be noted that the number of workplaces evaluated in this study was small.

KW - Chemicals

KW - Control

KW - Control banding

KW - COSHH Essentials

KW - Expert

KW - Exposure

KW - Hazard

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Small enterprises

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37549057585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37549057585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1539/joh.49.482

DO - 10.1539/joh.49.482

M3 - Article

C2 - 18075208

AN - SCOPUS:37549057585

VL - 49

SP - 482

EP - 492

JO - Journal of Occupational Health

JF - Journal of Occupational Health

SN - 1341-9145

IS - 6

ER -