Evidence-based surgery

Barriers, solutions, and the role of evidence synthesis

George Garas, Amel Ibrahim, Hutan Ashrafian, Kamran Ahmed, Vanash Patel, Koji Okabayashi, Petros Skapinakis, Ara Darzi, Thanos Athanasiou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Surgery is a rapidly evolving field, making the rigorous testing of emerging innovations vital. However, most surgical research fails to employ randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and has particularly been based on low-quality study designs. Subsequently, the analysis of data through meta-analysis and evidence synthesis is particularly difficult. Methods: Through a systematic review of the literature, this article explores the barriers to achieving a strong evidence base in surgery and offers potential solutions to overcome the barriers. Results: Many barriers exist to evidence-based surgical research. They include enabling factors, such as funding, time, infrastructure, patient preference, ethical issues, and additionally barriers associated with specific attributes related to researchers, methodologies, or interventions. Novel evidence synthesis techniques in surgery are discussed, including graphics synthesis, treatment networks, and network meta-analyses that help overcome many of the limitations associated with existing techniques. They offer the opportunity to assess gaps and quantitatively present inconsistencies within the existing evidence of RCTs. Conclusions: Poorly or inadequately performed RCTs and meta-analyses can give rise to incorrect results and thus fail to inform clinical practice or revise policy. The above barriers can be overcome by providing academic leadership and good organizational support to ensure that adequate personnel, resources, and funding are allocated to the researcher. Training in research methodology and data interpretation can ensure that trials are conducted correctly and evidence is adequately synthesized and disseminated. The ultimate goal of overcoming the barriers to evidencebased surgery includes the improved quality of patient care in addition to enhanced patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1723-1731
Number of pages9
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Aug
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Meta-Analysis
Research Personnel
Patient Preference
Quality of Health Care
Research
Ethics
Causality
Patient Care
Research Design
Therapeutics
Network Meta-Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Garas, G., Ibrahim, A., Ashrafian, H., Ahmed, K., Patel, V., Okabayashi, K., ... Athanasiou, T. (2012). Evidence-based surgery: Barriers, solutions, and the role of evidence synthesis. World Journal of Surgery, 36(8), 1723-1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1597-x

Evidence-based surgery : Barriers, solutions, and the role of evidence synthesis. / Garas, George; Ibrahim, Amel; Ashrafian, Hutan; Ahmed, Kamran; Patel, Vanash; Okabayashi, Koji; Skapinakis, Petros; Darzi, Ara; Athanasiou, Thanos.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 8, 08.2012, p. 1723-1731.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Garas, G, Ibrahim, A, Ashrafian, H, Ahmed, K, Patel, V, Okabayashi, K, Skapinakis, P, Darzi, A & Athanasiou, T 2012, 'Evidence-based surgery: Barriers, solutions, and the role of evidence synthesis', World Journal of Surgery, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1723-1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1597-x
Garas, George ; Ibrahim, Amel ; Ashrafian, Hutan ; Ahmed, Kamran ; Patel, Vanash ; Okabayashi, Koji ; Skapinakis, Petros ; Darzi, Ara ; Athanasiou, Thanos. / Evidence-based surgery : Barriers, solutions, and the role of evidence synthesis. In: World Journal of Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 36, No. 8. pp. 1723-1731.
@article{56693aaa303b468ea5746196f9381012,
title = "Evidence-based surgery: Barriers, solutions, and the role of evidence synthesis",
abstract = "Background: Surgery is a rapidly evolving field, making the rigorous testing of emerging innovations vital. However, most surgical research fails to employ randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and has particularly been based on low-quality study designs. Subsequently, the analysis of data through meta-analysis and evidence synthesis is particularly difficult. Methods: Through a systematic review of the literature, this article explores the barriers to achieving a strong evidence base in surgery and offers potential solutions to overcome the barriers. Results: Many barriers exist to evidence-based surgical research. They include enabling factors, such as funding, time, infrastructure, patient preference, ethical issues, and additionally barriers associated with specific attributes related to researchers, methodologies, or interventions. Novel evidence synthesis techniques in surgery are discussed, including graphics synthesis, treatment networks, and network meta-analyses that help overcome many of the limitations associated with existing techniques. They offer the opportunity to assess gaps and quantitatively present inconsistencies within the existing evidence of RCTs. Conclusions: Poorly or inadequately performed RCTs and meta-analyses can give rise to incorrect results and thus fail to inform clinical practice or revise policy. The above barriers can be overcome by providing academic leadership and good organizational support to ensure that adequate personnel, resources, and funding are allocated to the researcher. Training in research methodology and data interpretation can ensure that trials are conducted correctly and evidence is adequately synthesized and disseminated. The ultimate goal of overcoming the barriers to evidencebased surgery includes the improved quality of patient care in addition to enhanced patient outcomes.",
author = "George Garas and Amel Ibrahim and Hutan Ashrafian and Kamran Ahmed and Vanash Patel and Koji Okabayashi and Petros Skapinakis and Ara Darzi and Thanos Athanasiou",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-012-1597-x",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1723--1731",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based surgery

T2 - Barriers, solutions, and the role of evidence synthesis

AU - Garas, George

AU - Ibrahim, Amel

AU - Ashrafian, Hutan

AU - Ahmed, Kamran

AU - Patel, Vanash

AU - Okabayashi, Koji

AU - Skapinakis, Petros

AU - Darzi, Ara

AU - Athanasiou, Thanos

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Background: Surgery is a rapidly evolving field, making the rigorous testing of emerging innovations vital. However, most surgical research fails to employ randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and has particularly been based on low-quality study designs. Subsequently, the analysis of data through meta-analysis and evidence synthesis is particularly difficult. Methods: Through a systematic review of the literature, this article explores the barriers to achieving a strong evidence base in surgery and offers potential solutions to overcome the barriers. Results: Many barriers exist to evidence-based surgical research. They include enabling factors, such as funding, time, infrastructure, patient preference, ethical issues, and additionally barriers associated with specific attributes related to researchers, methodologies, or interventions. Novel evidence synthesis techniques in surgery are discussed, including graphics synthesis, treatment networks, and network meta-analyses that help overcome many of the limitations associated with existing techniques. They offer the opportunity to assess gaps and quantitatively present inconsistencies within the existing evidence of RCTs. Conclusions: Poorly or inadequately performed RCTs and meta-analyses can give rise to incorrect results and thus fail to inform clinical practice or revise policy. The above barriers can be overcome by providing academic leadership and good organizational support to ensure that adequate personnel, resources, and funding are allocated to the researcher. Training in research methodology and data interpretation can ensure that trials are conducted correctly and evidence is adequately synthesized and disseminated. The ultimate goal of overcoming the barriers to evidencebased surgery includes the improved quality of patient care in addition to enhanced patient outcomes.

AB - Background: Surgery is a rapidly evolving field, making the rigorous testing of emerging innovations vital. However, most surgical research fails to employ randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and has particularly been based on low-quality study designs. Subsequently, the analysis of data through meta-analysis and evidence synthesis is particularly difficult. Methods: Through a systematic review of the literature, this article explores the barriers to achieving a strong evidence base in surgery and offers potential solutions to overcome the barriers. Results: Many barriers exist to evidence-based surgical research. They include enabling factors, such as funding, time, infrastructure, patient preference, ethical issues, and additionally barriers associated with specific attributes related to researchers, methodologies, or interventions. Novel evidence synthesis techniques in surgery are discussed, including graphics synthesis, treatment networks, and network meta-analyses that help overcome many of the limitations associated with existing techniques. They offer the opportunity to assess gaps and quantitatively present inconsistencies within the existing evidence of RCTs. Conclusions: Poorly or inadequately performed RCTs and meta-analyses can give rise to incorrect results and thus fail to inform clinical practice or revise policy. The above barriers can be overcome by providing academic leadership and good organizational support to ensure that adequate personnel, resources, and funding are allocated to the researcher. Training in research methodology and data interpretation can ensure that trials are conducted correctly and evidence is adequately synthesized and disseminated. The ultimate goal of overcoming the barriers to evidencebased surgery includes the improved quality of patient care in addition to enhanced patient outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866650622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866650622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-012-1597-x

DO - 10.1007/s00268-012-1597-x

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1723

EP - 1731

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 8

ER -