Expansion of discharge planning system in Japan: Comparison of results of a nationwide survey between 2001 and 2010

Satoko Nagata, Hikari Tomura, Sachiyo Murashima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In response to the rapid aging of the population in Japan, many care systems have been created in quick succession. Establishment of discharge planning departments (DPDs) in hospitals is one of them. In this study, we compared the distribution and characteristics of DPDs and the characteristics of the hospitals that have DPDs between 2001 and 2010 in Japan. Methods: We mailed a questionnaire about the characteristics of hospitals and existence and situation of DPDs to all general hospitals with 100 or more general beds in 2001 and in 2010. Results: In 2001, of the 3,268 hospitals queried, 1,568 (48.0%) responded and 1,357 (41.5%) were selected for data analysis. In 2010, among 2,600 hospitals, 940 hospitals (36.1%) responded and 913 (35.1%) met the inclusion criteria. The percentage of hospitals with DPDs increased from 30% to more than 70% between the two surveys. More departments were under the direct control of the hospital director and more physicians participated in discharge planning activities in 2010 than in 2001. In 2001, private hospitals and hospitals with an affiliated institution or agency tended to have a DPD; however, the relationship between these factors and the presence of a DPD had disappeared in 2010. Larger hospitals and hospitals with more nurses per patient tended to have a DPD both in 2001 and 2010. Conclusions: Since 2008, the establishment of a DPD has been directly connected to medical fees so hospital administrators might have recognized the DPD as a 'necessary and paid for' department. Having a DPD was the majority's policy in Japan, and we must recognize the importance of quality assurance through DPDs from now on, especially in small hospitals.

Original languageEnglish
Article number237
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Patient Discharge
Japan
Hospital Departments
Surveys and Questionnaires
Medical Fees
Hospital Administrators
Private Hospitals
General Hospitals

Keywords

  • Discharge planning
  • Hospital administration
  • Length of stay
  • Nationwide survey
  • Quality of health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Expansion of discharge planning system in Japan : Comparison of results of a nationwide survey between 2001 and 2010. / Nagata, Satoko; Tomura, Hikari; Murashima, Sachiyo.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, 237, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{106ad45f063b4cb09f6689d48a8f32b4,
title = "Expansion of discharge planning system in Japan: Comparison of results of a nationwide survey between 2001 and 2010",
abstract = "Background: In response to the rapid aging of the population in Japan, many care systems have been created in quick succession. Establishment of discharge planning departments (DPDs) in hospitals is one of them. In this study, we compared the distribution and characteristics of DPDs and the characteristics of the hospitals that have DPDs between 2001 and 2010 in Japan. Methods: We mailed a questionnaire about the characteristics of hospitals and existence and situation of DPDs to all general hospitals with 100 or more general beds in 2001 and in 2010. Results: In 2001, of the 3,268 hospitals queried, 1,568 (48.0{\%}) responded and 1,357 (41.5{\%}) were selected for data analysis. In 2010, among 2,600 hospitals, 940 hospitals (36.1{\%}) responded and 913 (35.1{\%}) met the inclusion criteria. The percentage of hospitals with DPDs increased from 30{\%} to more than 70{\%} between the two surveys. More departments were under the direct control of the hospital director and more physicians participated in discharge planning activities in 2010 than in 2001. In 2001, private hospitals and hospitals with an affiliated institution or agency tended to have a DPD; however, the relationship between these factors and the presence of a DPD had disappeared in 2010. Larger hospitals and hospitals with more nurses per patient tended to have a DPD both in 2001 and 2010. Conclusions: Since 2008, the establishment of a DPD has been directly connected to medical fees so hospital administrators might have recognized the DPD as a 'necessary and paid for' department. Having a DPD was the majority's policy in Japan, and we must recognize the importance of quality assurance through DPDs from now on, especially in small hospitals.",
keywords = "Discharge planning, Hospital administration, Length of stay, Nationwide survey, Quality of health care",
author = "Satoko Nagata and Hikari Tomura and Sachiyo Murashima",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-12-237",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expansion of discharge planning system in Japan

T2 - Comparison of results of a nationwide survey between 2001 and 2010

AU - Nagata, Satoko

AU - Tomura, Hikari

AU - Murashima, Sachiyo

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: In response to the rapid aging of the population in Japan, many care systems have been created in quick succession. Establishment of discharge planning departments (DPDs) in hospitals is one of them. In this study, we compared the distribution and characteristics of DPDs and the characteristics of the hospitals that have DPDs between 2001 and 2010 in Japan. Methods: We mailed a questionnaire about the characteristics of hospitals and existence and situation of DPDs to all general hospitals with 100 or more general beds in 2001 and in 2010. Results: In 2001, of the 3,268 hospitals queried, 1,568 (48.0%) responded and 1,357 (41.5%) were selected for data analysis. In 2010, among 2,600 hospitals, 940 hospitals (36.1%) responded and 913 (35.1%) met the inclusion criteria. The percentage of hospitals with DPDs increased from 30% to more than 70% between the two surveys. More departments were under the direct control of the hospital director and more physicians participated in discharge planning activities in 2010 than in 2001. In 2001, private hospitals and hospitals with an affiliated institution or agency tended to have a DPD; however, the relationship between these factors and the presence of a DPD had disappeared in 2010. Larger hospitals and hospitals with more nurses per patient tended to have a DPD both in 2001 and 2010. Conclusions: Since 2008, the establishment of a DPD has been directly connected to medical fees so hospital administrators might have recognized the DPD as a 'necessary and paid for' department. Having a DPD was the majority's policy in Japan, and we must recognize the importance of quality assurance through DPDs from now on, especially in small hospitals.

AB - Background: In response to the rapid aging of the population in Japan, many care systems have been created in quick succession. Establishment of discharge planning departments (DPDs) in hospitals is one of them. In this study, we compared the distribution and characteristics of DPDs and the characteristics of the hospitals that have DPDs between 2001 and 2010 in Japan. Methods: We mailed a questionnaire about the characteristics of hospitals and existence and situation of DPDs to all general hospitals with 100 or more general beds in 2001 and in 2010. Results: In 2001, of the 3,268 hospitals queried, 1,568 (48.0%) responded and 1,357 (41.5%) were selected for data analysis. In 2010, among 2,600 hospitals, 940 hospitals (36.1%) responded and 913 (35.1%) met the inclusion criteria. The percentage of hospitals with DPDs increased from 30% to more than 70% between the two surveys. More departments were under the direct control of the hospital director and more physicians participated in discharge planning activities in 2010 than in 2001. In 2001, private hospitals and hospitals with an affiliated institution or agency tended to have a DPD; however, the relationship between these factors and the presence of a DPD had disappeared in 2010. Larger hospitals and hospitals with more nurses per patient tended to have a DPD both in 2001 and 2010. Conclusions: Since 2008, the establishment of a DPD has been directly connected to medical fees so hospital administrators might have recognized the DPD as a 'necessary and paid for' department. Having a DPD was the majority's policy in Japan, and we must recognize the importance of quality assurance through DPDs from now on, especially in small hospitals.

KW - Discharge planning

KW - Hospital administration

KW - Length of stay

KW - Nationwide survey

KW - Quality of health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864526856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864526856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-12-237

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-12-237

M3 - Article

C2 - 22863296

AN - SCOPUS:84864526856

VL - 12

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 1

M1 - 237

ER -