Experimental evaluation of relapse-risks in operated zygoma fractures

Maki Nagasao, Tomohisa Nagasao, Yorihisa Imanishi, Toshiki Tomita, Tamotsu Tamaki, Kaoru Ogawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Prevention of relapse, or postoperative dislocation, of the fixed zygoma is necessary to achieve optimal results in the treatment of zygoma fractures. Assuming that the occurrence of intensified stresses on mastication at the screw-bone interface (SBI) constitutes the essential cause of the relapse, we evaluated the stresses for three different fixation methods-fixation at the frontal process (FP), inferior orbital rim (IOR), and zygomatico-maxillary buttress (ZMB). Methods: We used 10 computer-aided design (CAD) models simulating zygoma fractures in the experiment. For each CAD model, we fixed the fractured zygoma with four screws and one mini-plate at the FP, IOR, or ZMB. After applying a 5.5 kg force simulating mastication, we calculated the intensity and distribution patterns of the stresses occurring at the SBIs of the fixation screws using the finite element method. Thereby, we evaluated dynamic stability of the fixed zygoma for each of the three fixation methods. Results: Greater stresses occur at the SBIs with IOR fixation than at those with FP and ZMB fixation. Although the stresses occurring at the SBIs on mastication demonstrated evenly distributed patterns with the FP and ZMB fixation, the stresses demonstrated concentration on one screw with the IOR fixation. Conclusions: The fixed zygoma is more likely to cause relapse with the IOR fixation than with the FP or ZMB fixation. Hence, in performing zygoma fixation at the IOR, care should be taken to minimize the likelihood of postoperative relapse that is caused by skewed distribution of the stresses on the fixation screws.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-175
Number of pages8
JournalAuris Nasus Larynx
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Apr

Fingerprint

Zygoma
Recurrence
Mastication
Computer-Aided Design
Bone Screws
Secondary Prevention

Keywords

  • Fixation
  • Fracture
  • Mastication
  • Screw
  • Stress
  • Zygoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Experimental evaluation of relapse-risks in operated zygoma fractures. / Nagasao, Maki; Nagasao, Tomohisa; Imanishi, Yorihisa; Tomita, Toshiki; Tamaki, Tamotsu; Ogawa, Kaoru.

In: Auris Nasus Larynx, Vol. 36, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 168-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nagasao, M, Nagasao, T, Imanishi, Y, Tomita, T, Tamaki, T & Ogawa, K 2009, 'Experimental evaluation of relapse-risks in operated zygoma fractures', Auris Nasus Larynx, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2008.05.007
Nagasao, Maki ; Nagasao, Tomohisa ; Imanishi, Yorihisa ; Tomita, Toshiki ; Tamaki, Tamotsu ; Ogawa, Kaoru. / Experimental evaluation of relapse-risks in operated zygoma fractures. In: Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 168-175.
@article{e7f7249589054b6eb89b16e9d14c252a,
title = "Experimental evaluation of relapse-risks in operated zygoma fractures",
abstract = "Objectives: Prevention of relapse, or postoperative dislocation, of the fixed zygoma is necessary to achieve optimal results in the treatment of zygoma fractures. Assuming that the occurrence of intensified stresses on mastication at the screw-bone interface (SBI) constitutes the essential cause of the relapse, we evaluated the stresses for three different fixation methods-fixation at the frontal process (FP), inferior orbital rim (IOR), and zygomatico-maxillary buttress (ZMB). Methods: We used 10 computer-aided design (CAD) models simulating zygoma fractures in the experiment. For each CAD model, we fixed the fractured zygoma with four screws and one mini-plate at the FP, IOR, or ZMB. After applying a 5.5 kg force simulating mastication, we calculated the intensity and distribution patterns of the stresses occurring at the SBIs of the fixation screws using the finite element method. Thereby, we evaluated dynamic stability of the fixed zygoma for each of the three fixation methods. Results: Greater stresses occur at the SBIs with IOR fixation than at those with FP and ZMB fixation. Although the stresses occurring at the SBIs on mastication demonstrated evenly distributed patterns with the FP and ZMB fixation, the stresses demonstrated concentration on one screw with the IOR fixation. Conclusions: The fixed zygoma is more likely to cause relapse with the IOR fixation than with the FP or ZMB fixation. Hence, in performing zygoma fixation at the IOR, care should be taken to minimize the likelihood of postoperative relapse that is caused by skewed distribution of the stresses on the fixation screws.",
keywords = "Fixation, Fracture, Mastication, Screw, Stress, Zygoma",
author = "Maki Nagasao and Tomohisa Nagasao and Yorihisa Imanishi and Toshiki Tomita and Tamotsu Tamaki and Kaoru Ogawa",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.anl.2008.05.007",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "168--175",
journal = "Auris Nasus Larynx",
issn = "0385-8146",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental evaluation of relapse-risks in operated zygoma fractures

AU - Nagasao, Maki

AU - Nagasao, Tomohisa

AU - Imanishi, Yorihisa

AU - Tomita, Toshiki

AU - Tamaki, Tamotsu

AU - Ogawa, Kaoru

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Objectives: Prevention of relapse, or postoperative dislocation, of the fixed zygoma is necessary to achieve optimal results in the treatment of zygoma fractures. Assuming that the occurrence of intensified stresses on mastication at the screw-bone interface (SBI) constitutes the essential cause of the relapse, we evaluated the stresses for three different fixation methods-fixation at the frontal process (FP), inferior orbital rim (IOR), and zygomatico-maxillary buttress (ZMB). Methods: We used 10 computer-aided design (CAD) models simulating zygoma fractures in the experiment. For each CAD model, we fixed the fractured zygoma with four screws and one mini-plate at the FP, IOR, or ZMB. After applying a 5.5 kg force simulating mastication, we calculated the intensity and distribution patterns of the stresses occurring at the SBIs of the fixation screws using the finite element method. Thereby, we evaluated dynamic stability of the fixed zygoma for each of the three fixation methods. Results: Greater stresses occur at the SBIs with IOR fixation than at those with FP and ZMB fixation. Although the stresses occurring at the SBIs on mastication demonstrated evenly distributed patterns with the FP and ZMB fixation, the stresses demonstrated concentration on one screw with the IOR fixation. Conclusions: The fixed zygoma is more likely to cause relapse with the IOR fixation than with the FP or ZMB fixation. Hence, in performing zygoma fixation at the IOR, care should be taken to minimize the likelihood of postoperative relapse that is caused by skewed distribution of the stresses on the fixation screws.

AB - Objectives: Prevention of relapse, or postoperative dislocation, of the fixed zygoma is necessary to achieve optimal results in the treatment of zygoma fractures. Assuming that the occurrence of intensified stresses on mastication at the screw-bone interface (SBI) constitutes the essential cause of the relapse, we evaluated the stresses for three different fixation methods-fixation at the frontal process (FP), inferior orbital rim (IOR), and zygomatico-maxillary buttress (ZMB). Methods: We used 10 computer-aided design (CAD) models simulating zygoma fractures in the experiment. For each CAD model, we fixed the fractured zygoma with four screws and one mini-plate at the FP, IOR, or ZMB. After applying a 5.5 kg force simulating mastication, we calculated the intensity and distribution patterns of the stresses occurring at the SBIs of the fixation screws using the finite element method. Thereby, we evaluated dynamic stability of the fixed zygoma for each of the three fixation methods. Results: Greater stresses occur at the SBIs with IOR fixation than at those with FP and ZMB fixation. Although the stresses occurring at the SBIs on mastication demonstrated evenly distributed patterns with the FP and ZMB fixation, the stresses demonstrated concentration on one screw with the IOR fixation. Conclusions: The fixed zygoma is more likely to cause relapse with the IOR fixation than with the FP or ZMB fixation. Hence, in performing zygoma fixation at the IOR, care should be taken to minimize the likelihood of postoperative relapse that is caused by skewed distribution of the stresses on the fixation screws.

KW - Fixation

KW - Fracture

KW - Mastication

KW - Screw

KW - Stress

KW - Zygoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59849129308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59849129308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anl.2008.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.anl.2008.05.007

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 168

EP - 175

JO - Auris Nasus Larynx

JF - Auris Nasus Larynx

SN - 0385-8146

IS - 2

ER -