Factors of error and effort in memory intervention for patients with Alzheimer's disease and amnesic syndrome

Masaru Mimura, Shin Ichi Komatsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Factors of error and effort in study conditions play a crucial role in the intervention for memory-impaired individuals. In the present study, efficacy of four study conditions was compared in order to elucidate the optimal study conditions: errorless/errorful and effortless/effortful.Methods: A total of 18 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 12 patients with amnesic syndrome received study-test sessions under four different study conditions: errorless/errorful and effortless/effortful.Results: The errorless learning advantage was confirmed for both Alzheimer's disease and amnesic syndrome on both free recall and cued recall tests. In contrast, effortful learning was effective only for amnesic syndrome on a free recall test.Conclusion: Despite the overall advantage of errorless learning, the effortful process was effective in circumscribed situations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-186
Number of pages8
JournalPsychogeriatrics
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Dec
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Alzheimer Disease
Learning
Alzheimer Disease 12

Keywords

  • Dementia
  • Effort
  • Error
  • New learning
  • Training
  • Vanishing cues

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Gerontology

Cite this

Factors of error and effort in memory intervention for patients with Alzheimer's disease and amnesic syndrome. / Mimura, Masaru; Komatsu, Shin Ichi.

In: Psychogeriatrics, Vol. 10, No. 4, 12.2010, p. 179-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f882b7c743545ed81c718bbd288c01c,
title = "Factors of error and effort in memory intervention for patients with Alzheimer's disease and amnesic syndrome",
abstract = "Background: Factors of error and effort in study conditions play a crucial role in the intervention for memory-impaired individuals. In the present study, efficacy of four study conditions was compared in order to elucidate the optimal study conditions: errorless/errorful and effortless/effortful.Methods: A total of 18 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 12 patients with amnesic syndrome received study-test sessions under four different study conditions: errorless/errorful and effortless/effortful.Results: The errorless learning advantage was confirmed for both Alzheimer's disease and amnesic syndrome on both free recall and cued recall tests. In contrast, effortful learning was effective only for amnesic syndrome on a free recall test.Conclusion: Despite the overall advantage of errorless learning, the effortful process was effective in circumscribed situations.",
keywords = "Dementia, Effort, Error, New learning, Training, Vanishing cues",
author = "Masaru Mimura and Komatsu, {Shin Ichi}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1479-8301.2010.00339.x",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "179--186",
journal = "Psychogeriatrics",
issn = "1346-3500",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors of error and effort in memory intervention for patients with Alzheimer's disease and amnesic syndrome

AU - Mimura, Masaru

AU - Komatsu, Shin Ichi

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Background: Factors of error and effort in study conditions play a crucial role in the intervention for memory-impaired individuals. In the present study, efficacy of four study conditions was compared in order to elucidate the optimal study conditions: errorless/errorful and effortless/effortful.Methods: A total of 18 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 12 patients with amnesic syndrome received study-test sessions under four different study conditions: errorless/errorful and effortless/effortful.Results: The errorless learning advantage was confirmed for both Alzheimer's disease and amnesic syndrome on both free recall and cued recall tests. In contrast, effortful learning was effective only for amnesic syndrome on a free recall test.Conclusion: Despite the overall advantage of errorless learning, the effortful process was effective in circumscribed situations.

AB - Background: Factors of error and effort in study conditions play a crucial role in the intervention for memory-impaired individuals. In the present study, efficacy of four study conditions was compared in order to elucidate the optimal study conditions: errorless/errorful and effortless/effortful.Methods: A total of 18 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 12 patients with amnesic syndrome received study-test sessions under four different study conditions: errorless/errorful and effortless/effortful.Results: The errorless learning advantage was confirmed for both Alzheimer's disease and amnesic syndrome on both free recall and cued recall tests. In contrast, effortful learning was effective only for amnesic syndrome on a free recall test.Conclusion: Despite the overall advantage of errorless learning, the effortful process was effective in circumscribed situations.

KW - Dementia

KW - Effort

KW - Error

KW - New learning

KW - Training

KW - Vanishing cues

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650095676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650095676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2010.00339.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2010.00339.x

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 179

EP - 186

JO - Psychogeriatrics

JF - Psychogeriatrics

SN - 1346-3500

IS - 4

ER -