Fast scanning tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules

Diagnostic performance compared with chest radiography, using multidetector-row computed tomography as the reference

Yoshitake Yamada, Masahiro Jinzaki, Ichiro Hasegawa, Eisuke Shiomi, Hiroaki Sugiura, Takayuki Abe, Yuji Sato, Sachio Kuribayashi, Kenji Ogawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of fast scanning tomosynthesis in comparison with that of chest radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules, using multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) as the reference, and to assess the association of the true-positive fraction (TPF) with the size, CT attenuation value, and location of the nodules. Materials and methods: The institutional review board approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Fifty-seven patients with and 59 without pulmonary nodules underwent chest MDCT, fast scanning tomosynthesis, and radiography. The images of tomosynthesis and radiography were randomly read by 3 blinded radiologists; MDCT served as the reference standard. Free-response receiver-operating characteristic (FROC) and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, Cochran-Armitage trend or Fisher exact test, a conditional logistic regression model, and McNemar test were used. Results: Both FROC and ROC analyses revealed significantly better performance (P < 0.01) of fast scanning tomosynthesis than radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules. For fast scanning tomosynthesis, the average TPF and false-positive rate as determined by FROC analysis were 0.80 and 0.10, respectively. For both fast scanning tomosynthesis and radiography, the average TPF increased with increasing nodule size and CT attenuation values, and was lower for subpleural nodules (all P < 0.01). Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of fast scanning tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules was significantly superior to that of radiography. The TPF was affected by the size, CT attenuation value, and location of the nodule, in both fast scanning tomosynthesis and radiography.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-477
Number of pages7
JournalInvestigative Radiology
Volume46
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Multidetector Computed Tomography
Radiography
Thorax
ROC Curve
Lung
Logistic Models
Research Ethics Committees
Informed Consent

Keywords

  • chest
  • computed tomography
  • pulmonary nodule
  • radiography
  • tomosynthesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Fast scanning tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules : Diagnostic performance compared with chest radiography, using multidetector-row computed tomography as the reference. / Yamada, Yoshitake; Jinzaki, Masahiro; Hasegawa, Ichiro; Shiomi, Eisuke; Sugiura, Hiroaki; Abe, Takayuki; Sato, Yuji; Kuribayashi, Sachio; Ogawa, Kenji.

In: Investigative Radiology, Vol. 46, No. 8, 2011, p. 471-477.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yamada, Yoshitake ; Jinzaki, Masahiro ; Hasegawa, Ichiro ; Shiomi, Eisuke ; Sugiura, Hiroaki ; Abe, Takayuki ; Sato, Yuji ; Kuribayashi, Sachio ; Ogawa, Kenji. / Fast scanning tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules : Diagnostic performance compared with chest radiography, using multidetector-row computed tomography as the reference. In: Investigative Radiology. 2011 ; Vol. 46, No. 8. pp. 471-477.
@article{db34bb551d3f4c9faca45f9275eb2e83,
title = "Fast scanning tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules: Diagnostic performance compared with chest radiography, using multidetector-row computed tomography as the reference",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of fast scanning tomosynthesis in comparison with that of chest radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules, using multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) as the reference, and to assess the association of the true-positive fraction (TPF) with the size, CT attenuation value, and location of the nodules. Materials and methods: The institutional review board approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Fifty-seven patients with and 59 without pulmonary nodules underwent chest MDCT, fast scanning tomosynthesis, and radiography. The images of tomosynthesis and radiography were randomly read by 3 blinded radiologists; MDCT served as the reference standard. Free-response receiver-operating characteristic (FROC) and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, Cochran-Armitage trend or Fisher exact test, a conditional logistic regression model, and McNemar test were used. Results: Both FROC and ROC analyses revealed significantly better performance (P < 0.01) of fast scanning tomosynthesis than radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules. For fast scanning tomosynthesis, the average TPF and false-positive rate as determined by FROC analysis were 0.80 and 0.10, respectively. For both fast scanning tomosynthesis and radiography, the average TPF increased with increasing nodule size and CT attenuation values, and was lower for subpleural nodules (all P < 0.01). Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of fast scanning tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules was significantly superior to that of radiography. The TPF was affected by the size, CT attenuation value, and location of the nodule, in both fast scanning tomosynthesis and radiography.",
keywords = "chest, computed tomography, pulmonary nodule, radiography, tomosynthesis",
author = "Yoshitake Yamada and Masahiro Jinzaki and Ichiro Hasegawa and Eisuke Shiomi and Hiroaki Sugiura and Takayuki Abe and Yuji Sato and Sachio Kuribayashi and Kenji Ogawa",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1097/RLI.0b013e318217b838",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "471--477",
journal = "Investigative Radiology",
issn = "0020-9996",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fast scanning tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules

T2 - Diagnostic performance compared with chest radiography, using multidetector-row computed tomography as the reference

AU - Yamada, Yoshitake

AU - Jinzaki, Masahiro

AU - Hasegawa, Ichiro

AU - Shiomi, Eisuke

AU - Sugiura, Hiroaki

AU - Abe, Takayuki

AU - Sato, Yuji

AU - Kuribayashi, Sachio

AU - Ogawa, Kenji

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of fast scanning tomosynthesis in comparison with that of chest radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules, using multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) as the reference, and to assess the association of the true-positive fraction (TPF) with the size, CT attenuation value, and location of the nodules. Materials and methods: The institutional review board approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Fifty-seven patients with and 59 without pulmonary nodules underwent chest MDCT, fast scanning tomosynthesis, and radiography. The images of tomosynthesis and radiography were randomly read by 3 blinded radiologists; MDCT served as the reference standard. Free-response receiver-operating characteristic (FROC) and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, Cochran-Armitage trend or Fisher exact test, a conditional logistic regression model, and McNemar test were used. Results: Both FROC and ROC analyses revealed significantly better performance (P < 0.01) of fast scanning tomosynthesis than radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules. For fast scanning tomosynthesis, the average TPF and false-positive rate as determined by FROC analysis were 0.80 and 0.10, respectively. For both fast scanning tomosynthesis and radiography, the average TPF increased with increasing nodule size and CT attenuation values, and was lower for subpleural nodules (all P < 0.01). Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of fast scanning tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules was significantly superior to that of radiography. The TPF was affected by the size, CT attenuation value, and location of the nodule, in both fast scanning tomosynthesis and radiography.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of fast scanning tomosynthesis in comparison with that of chest radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules, using multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) as the reference, and to assess the association of the true-positive fraction (TPF) with the size, CT attenuation value, and location of the nodules. Materials and methods: The institutional review board approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Fifty-seven patients with and 59 without pulmonary nodules underwent chest MDCT, fast scanning tomosynthesis, and radiography. The images of tomosynthesis and radiography were randomly read by 3 blinded radiologists; MDCT served as the reference standard. Free-response receiver-operating characteristic (FROC) and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, Cochran-Armitage trend or Fisher exact test, a conditional logistic regression model, and McNemar test were used. Results: Both FROC and ROC analyses revealed significantly better performance (P < 0.01) of fast scanning tomosynthesis than radiography for the detection of pulmonary nodules. For fast scanning tomosynthesis, the average TPF and false-positive rate as determined by FROC analysis were 0.80 and 0.10, respectively. For both fast scanning tomosynthesis and radiography, the average TPF increased with increasing nodule size and CT attenuation values, and was lower for subpleural nodules (all P < 0.01). Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of fast scanning tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules was significantly superior to that of radiography. The TPF was affected by the size, CT attenuation value, and location of the nodule, in both fast scanning tomosynthesis and radiography.

KW - chest

KW - computed tomography

KW - pulmonary nodule

KW - radiography

KW - tomosynthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959807399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959807399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318217b838

DO - 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318217b838

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 471

EP - 477

JO - Investigative Radiology

JF - Investigative Radiology

SN - 0020-9996

IS - 8

ER -