Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure

Ho Joong Kim, Heoung Jae Chun, Kyoung Tak Kang, Hwan Mo Lee, Bong Soon Chang, Choon Ki Lee, Jin S. Yeom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the biomechani­cal behavior of the lumbar spine after posterior decompression with the spinous process osteotomy (SPiO) technique or the conventional laminectomy (CL) tech­nique using a finite element (FE) model. Materials and Methods: Three validated lumbar FE models (L2‒5) which represented intact spine and two decompression models using SPiO and CL techniques at the L3‒4 segment were developed. In each model, the ranges of motion, the maximal von Mises stress of the annulus fi­brosus, and the intradiscal pressures at the index segment (L3‒4) and adjacent seg­ments (L2‒3 and L4‒5) under 7.5 Nm moments were analyzed. Facet contact forces were also compared among three models under the extension and torsion moments. Results: Compared to the intact model, the CL and SPiO models had increased range of motion and annulus stress at both the index segment (L3‒4) and the adjacent segments under flexion and torsion. However, the SPiO model dem­onstrated a reduced range of motion and annulus stress than the CL model. Both CL and SPiO models had an increase of facet contact force at the L3‒4 segment under the torsion moment compared to that of the intact model. Under the exten­sion moment, however, three models demonstrated a similar facet contact force even at the L3‒4 model. Conclusion: Both decompression methods lead to post­operative segmental instability compared to the intact model. However, SPiO tech­nique leads to better segmental stability compared to the CL technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146-153
Number of pages8
JournalYonsei Medical Journal
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Finite Element Analysis
Laminectomy
Galectin 3
Osteotomy
Decompression
Articular Range of Motion
Spine
Pressure

Keywords

  • Conventional laminectomy
  • Finite element model
  • Lumbar spinal stenosis
  • Spinous process osteotomies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure. / Kim, Ho Joong; Chun, Heoung Jae; Kang, Kyoung Tak; Lee, Hwan Mo; Chang, Bong Soon; Lee, Choon Ki; Yeom, Jin S.

In: Yonsei Medical Journal, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 146-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Ho Joong ; Chun, Heoung Jae ; Kang, Kyoung Tak ; Lee, Hwan Mo ; Chang, Bong Soon ; Lee, Choon Ki ; Yeom, Jin S. / Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure. In: Yonsei Medical Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 146-153.
@article{394d710b1ece49b08f96aa0d7509d51b,
title = "Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the biomechani­cal behavior of the lumbar spine after posterior decompression with the spinous process osteotomy (SPiO) technique or the conventional laminectomy (CL) tech­nique using a finite element (FE) model. Materials and Methods: Three validated lumbar FE models (L2‒5) which represented intact spine and two decompression models using SPiO and CL techniques at the L3‒4 segment were developed. In each model, the ranges of motion, the maximal von Mises stress of the annulus fi­brosus, and the intradiscal pressures at the index segment (L3‒4) and adjacent seg­ments (L2‒3 and L4‒5) under 7.5 Nm moments were analyzed. Facet contact forces were also compared among three models under the extension and torsion moments. Results: Compared to the intact model, the CL and SPiO models had increased range of motion and annulus stress at both the index segment (L3‒4) and the adjacent segments under flexion and torsion. However, the SPiO model dem­onstrated a reduced range of motion and annulus stress than the CL model. Both CL and SPiO models had an increase of facet contact force at the L3‒4 segment under the torsion moment compared to that of the intact model. Under the exten­sion moment, however, three models demonstrated a similar facet contact force even at the L3‒4 model. Conclusion: Both decompression methods lead to post­operative segmental instability compared to the intact model. However, SPiO tech­nique leads to better segmental stability compared to the CL technique.",
keywords = "Conventional laminectomy, Finite element model, Lumbar spinal stenosis, Spinous process osteotomies",
author = "Kim, {Ho Joong} and Chun, {Heoung Jae} and Kang, {Kyoung Tak} and Lee, {Hwan Mo} and Chang, {Bong Soon} and Lee, {Choon Ki} and Yeom, {Jin S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.146",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "146--153",
journal = "Yonsei Medical Journal",
issn = "0513-5796",
publisher = "Yonsei University College of Medicine",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure

AU - Kim, Ho Joong

AU - Chun, Heoung Jae

AU - Kang, Kyoung Tak

AU - Lee, Hwan Mo

AU - Chang, Bong Soon

AU - Lee, Choon Ki

AU - Yeom, Jin S.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the biomechani­cal behavior of the lumbar spine after posterior decompression with the spinous process osteotomy (SPiO) technique or the conventional laminectomy (CL) tech­nique using a finite element (FE) model. Materials and Methods: Three validated lumbar FE models (L2‒5) which represented intact spine and two decompression models using SPiO and CL techniques at the L3‒4 segment were developed. In each model, the ranges of motion, the maximal von Mises stress of the annulus fi­brosus, and the intradiscal pressures at the index segment (L3‒4) and adjacent seg­ments (L2‒3 and L4‒5) under 7.5 Nm moments were analyzed. Facet contact forces were also compared among three models under the extension and torsion moments. Results: Compared to the intact model, the CL and SPiO models had increased range of motion and annulus stress at both the index segment (L3‒4) and the adjacent segments under flexion and torsion. However, the SPiO model dem­onstrated a reduced range of motion and annulus stress than the CL model. Both CL and SPiO models had an increase of facet contact force at the L3‒4 segment under the torsion moment compared to that of the intact model. Under the exten­sion moment, however, three models demonstrated a similar facet contact force even at the L3‒4 model. Conclusion: Both decompression methods lead to post­operative segmental instability compared to the intact model. However, SPiO tech­nique leads to better segmental stability compared to the CL technique.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the biomechani­cal behavior of the lumbar spine after posterior decompression with the spinous process osteotomy (SPiO) technique or the conventional laminectomy (CL) tech­nique using a finite element (FE) model. Materials and Methods: Three validated lumbar FE models (L2‒5) which represented intact spine and two decompression models using SPiO and CL techniques at the L3‒4 segment were developed. In each model, the ranges of motion, the maximal von Mises stress of the annulus fi­brosus, and the intradiscal pressures at the index segment (L3‒4) and adjacent seg­ments (L2‒3 and L4‒5) under 7.5 Nm moments were analyzed. Facet contact forces were also compared among three models under the extension and torsion moments. Results: Compared to the intact model, the CL and SPiO models had increased range of motion and annulus stress at both the index segment (L3‒4) and the adjacent segments under flexion and torsion. However, the SPiO model dem­onstrated a reduced range of motion and annulus stress than the CL model. Both CL and SPiO models had an increase of facet contact force at the L3‒4 segment under the torsion moment compared to that of the intact model. Under the exten­sion moment, however, three models demonstrated a similar facet contact force even at the L3‒4 model. Conclusion: Both decompression methods lead to post­operative segmental instability compared to the intact model. However, SPiO tech­nique leads to better segmental stability compared to the CL technique.

KW - Conventional laminectomy

KW - Finite element model

KW - Lumbar spinal stenosis

KW - Spinous process osteotomies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918790560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918790560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.146

DO - 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.146

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 146

EP - 153

JO - Yonsei Medical Journal

JF - Yonsei Medical Journal

SN - 0513-5796

IS - 1

ER -