TY - JOUR
T1 - First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
T2 - a Japanese subgroup analysis of open-label, phase 3 trial (CheckMate 648/ONO-4538-50)
AU - Kato, Ken
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
AU - Ogata, Takashi
AU - Motoyama, Satoru
AU - Kawakami, Hisato
AU - Ueno, Masaki
AU - Kojima, Takashi
AU - Shirakawa, Yasuhiro
AU - Okada, Morihito
AU - Ishihara, Ryu
AU - Kubota, Yutaro
AU - Amaya-Chanaga, Carlos
AU - Chen, Tian
AU - Matsumura, Yasuhiro
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all the study participants and their families, investigators, and study teams. Medical writing support was provided by MedPro Clinical Research, and was funded by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Bristol Myers Squibb. The authors also thank Minal Jaggar, PhD, Vidula Bhole, MD, MHSc, and Ivan D’Souza, MS, of MedPro Clinical Research for providing medical writing support for this manuscript.
Funding Information:
This study was supported by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Japan, and Bristol Myers Squibb, USA.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Background: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-based treatments are approved for several cancers. CheckMate 648, a global, phase 3 trial, showed that first-line nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) or nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NIVO + Chemo) significantly increased survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) without new safety signals versus chemotherapy alone (Chemo). Methods: We evaluated the Japanese subpopulation of CheckMate 648 (n = 394/970), randomized to receive first-line NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, or Chemo. Efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in Japanese patients with tumor-cell programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% and in all randomized Japanese patients. Results: In the Japanese population, 131, 126, and 137 patients were treated with NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo, and 66, 62, and 65 patients had tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, respectively. In patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (20.2 months; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.46 [0.30–0.71]) and NIVO + Chemo (17.3 months; 0.53 [0.35–0.82]) versus Chemo (9.0 months). In all randomized patients, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (17.6 months; 0.68 [0.51–0.92]) and NIVO + Chemo (15.5 months; 0.73 [0.54–0.99]) versus Chemo (11.0 months). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 37%, 49%, and 36% of all patients in the NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo arms, respectively. Conclusion: Survival benefits with acceptable tolerability observed for NIVO + IPI and NIVO + Chemo treatments strongly support their use as a new standard first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced ESCC. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03143153.
AB - Background: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-based treatments are approved for several cancers. CheckMate 648, a global, phase 3 trial, showed that first-line nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) or nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NIVO + Chemo) significantly increased survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) without new safety signals versus chemotherapy alone (Chemo). Methods: We evaluated the Japanese subpopulation of CheckMate 648 (n = 394/970), randomized to receive first-line NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, or Chemo. Efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in Japanese patients with tumor-cell programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% and in all randomized Japanese patients. Results: In the Japanese population, 131, 126, and 137 patients were treated with NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo, and 66, 62, and 65 patients had tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, respectively. In patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (20.2 months; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.46 [0.30–0.71]) and NIVO + Chemo (17.3 months; 0.53 [0.35–0.82]) versus Chemo (9.0 months). In all randomized patients, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (17.6 months; 0.68 [0.51–0.92]) and NIVO + Chemo (15.5 months; 0.73 [0.54–0.99]) versus Chemo (11.0 months). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 37%, 49%, and 36% of all patients in the NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo arms, respectively. Conclusion: Survival benefits with acceptable tolerability observed for NIVO + IPI and NIVO + Chemo treatments strongly support their use as a new standard first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced ESCC. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03143153.
KW - Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
KW - First-line treatment
KW - Ipilimumab
KW - Japanese population
KW - Nivolumab
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142295093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142295093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10388-022-00970-1
DO - 10.1007/s10388-022-00970-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 36401133
AN - SCOPUS:85142295093
SN - 1612-9059
VL - 20
SP - 291
EP - 301
JO - Esophagus
JF - Esophagus
IS - 2
ER -