Focus and givenness across the grammar

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This paper takes seriously the idea that a single expression can be simultaneously marked as given and as a focus, and works out some of the consequences of that assumption. I adopt Katz and Selkirk’s (2011) suggestion that givenness is the flip side of newness rather than of focus, and argue that neither Rooth’s semantics of focus nor Schwarzschild’s analysis of givenness is by itself sufficient to account for a range of novel observations. I then show how both analyses can be maintained provided that the syntactic and phonological assumptions about focus/givenness marking and pitch accent assignment are appropriately revised.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages200-222
Number of pages23
Volume9067
ISBN (Print)9783662481189
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Event6th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, JSAI 2014 - Kanagawa, Japan
Duration: 2014 Oct 272014 Oct 28

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume9067
ISSN (Print)03029743
ISSN (Electronic)16113349

Other

Other6th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, JSAI 2014
CountryJapan
CityKanagawa
Period14/10/2714/10/28

Fingerprint

Syntactics
Grammar
Semantics
Flip
Assignment
Sufficient
Range of data
Syntax
Observation

Keywords

  • Focus
  • Givenness
  • Newness
  • Pitch accents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Theoretical Computer Science

Cite this

Tancredi, C. D. (2015). Focus and givenness across the grammar. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9067, pp. 200-222). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 9067). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48119-6_15

Focus and givenness across the grammar. / Tancredi, Christopher D.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 9067 Springer Verlag, 2015. p. 200-222 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 9067).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Tancredi, CD 2015, Focus and givenness across the grammar. in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). vol. 9067, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 9067, Springer Verlag, pp. 200-222, 6th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, JSAI 2014, Kanagawa, Japan, 14/10/27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48119-6_15
Tancredi CD. Focus and givenness across the grammar. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 9067. Springer Verlag. 2015. p. 200-222. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48119-6_15
Tancredi, Christopher D. / Focus and givenness across the grammar. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 9067 Springer Verlag, 2015. pp. 200-222 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).
@inproceedings{972e0cf8e9ff4e83a4c95b2091378b21,
title = "Focus and givenness across the grammar",
abstract = "This paper takes seriously the idea that a single expression can be simultaneously marked as given and as a focus, and works out some of the consequences of that assumption. I adopt Katz and Selkirk’s (2011) suggestion that givenness is the flip side of newness rather than of focus, and argue that neither Rooth’s semantics of focus nor Schwarzschild’s analysis of givenness is by itself sufficient to account for a range of novel observations. I then show how both analyses can be maintained provided that the syntactic and phonological assumptions about focus/givenness marking and pitch accent assignment are appropriately revised.",
keywords = "Focus, Givenness, Newness, Pitch accents",
author = "Tancredi, {Christopher D}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-48119-6_15",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783662481189",
volume = "9067",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "200--222",
booktitle = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Focus and givenness across the grammar

AU - Tancredi, Christopher D

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper takes seriously the idea that a single expression can be simultaneously marked as given and as a focus, and works out some of the consequences of that assumption. I adopt Katz and Selkirk’s (2011) suggestion that givenness is the flip side of newness rather than of focus, and argue that neither Rooth’s semantics of focus nor Schwarzschild’s analysis of givenness is by itself sufficient to account for a range of novel observations. I then show how both analyses can be maintained provided that the syntactic and phonological assumptions about focus/givenness marking and pitch accent assignment are appropriately revised.

AB - This paper takes seriously the idea that a single expression can be simultaneously marked as given and as a focus, and works out some of the consequences of that assumption. I adopt Katz and Selkirk’s (2011) suggestion that givenness is the flip side of newness rather than of focus, and argue that neither Rooth’s semantics of focus nor Schwarzschild’s analysis of givenness is by itself sufficient to account for a range of novel observations. I then show how both analyses can be maintained provided that the syntactic and phonological assumptions about focus/givenness marking and pitch accent assignment are appropriately revised.

KW - Focus

KW - Givenness

KW - Newness

KW - Pitch accents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945538369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945538369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-662-48119-6_15

DO - 10.1007/978-3-662-48119-6_15

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84945538369

SN - 9783662481189

VL - 9067

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 200

EP - 222

BT - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

PB - Springer Verlag

ER -