Foreign direct investment and regulatory remedies for banking crises

Lessons from Japan

Linda Allen, Suparna Chakraborty, Wako Watanabe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Can regulatory interventions alleviate financial crises? If so, which ones work? We draw inferences from the Japanese banking crisis of the 1990s using a hand-gathered database of bank loans gathered from original sources. Our results indicate that whereas risk-based capital infusions in Japan (similar to those following the 2009 Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (stress tests) in the US) were successful in stimulating aggregate lending by Japanese banks, earlier blanket infusions (comparable to the 2008 Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) in the US) were not effective. Moreover, changes in accounting rules in Japan that revalued bank assets (similar to the relaxation of mark-to-market requirements for banks in the US) did not increase aggregate Japanese bank lending, but rather reallocated it. Capital constraints during the crisis also induced many Japanese banks to close their overseas branches and switch their charters from international to domestic. This endogenous charter switch reversed the process of foreign direct investment (FDI) for many Japanese banks. Therefore we use the Japanese banking crisis as a natural experiment to test FDI theories and find empirical support for the relative access hypothesis, but not for the industrial organization approach or for the relative wealth hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)875-893
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of International Business Studies
Volume42
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Sep

Fingerprint

Switches
Experiments
Japanese banks
Remedies
Banking crisis
Japan
Foreign direct investment
Assets
Japanese banking
Charter

Keywords

  • accounting changes
  • bank lending
  • banking crisis
  • capital interventions
  • internalization theory
  • public capital injections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Foreign direct investment and regulatory remedies for banking crises : Lessons from Japan. / Allen, Linda; Chakraborty, Suparna; Watanabe, Wako.

In: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 42, No. 7, 09.2011, p. 875-893.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b0d5b084432840f88920b3de98b86c75,
title = "Foreign direct investment and regulatory remedies for banking crises: Lessons from Japan",
abstract = "Can regulatory interventions alleviate financial crises? If so, which ones work? We draw inferences from the Japanese banking crisis of the 1990s using a hand-gathered database of bank loans gathered from original sources. Our results indicate that whereas risk-based capital infusions in Japan (similar to those following the 2009 Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (stress tests) in the US) were successful in stimulating aggregate lending by Japanese banks, earlier blanket infusions (comparable to the 2008 Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) in the US) were not effective. Moreover, changes in accounting rules in Japan that revalued bank assets (similar to the relaxation of mark-to-market requirements for banks in the US) did not increase aggregate Japanese bank lending, but rather reallocated it. Capital constraints during the crisis also induced many Japanese banks to close their overseas branches and switch their charters from international to domestic. This endogenous charter switch reversed the process of foreign direct investment (FDI) for many Japanese banks. Therefore we use the Japanese banking crisis as a natural experiment to test FDI theories and find empirical support for the relative access hypothesis, but not for the industrial organization approach or for the relative wealth hypothesis.",
keywords = "accounting changes, bank lending, banking crisis, capital interventions, internalization theory, public capital injections",
author = "Linda Allen and Suparna Chakraborty and Wako Watanabe",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1057/jibs.2011.17",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "875--893",
journal = "Journal of International Business Studies",
issn = "0047-2506",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Foreign direct investment and regulatory remedies for banking crises

T2 - Lessons from Japan

AU - Allen, Linda

AU - Chakraborty, Suparna

AU - Watanabe, Wako

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Can regulatory interventions alleviate financial crises? If so, which ones work? We draw inferences from the Japanese banking crisis of the 1990s using a hand-gathered database of bank loans gathered from original sources. Our results indicate that whereas risk-based capital infusions in Japan (similar to those following the 2009 Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (stress tests) in the US) were successful in stimulating aggregate lending by Japanese banks, earlier blanket infusions (comparable to the 2008 Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) in the US) were not effective. Moreover, changes in accounting rules in Japan that revalued bank assets (similar to the relaxation of mark-to-market requirements for banks in the US) did not increase aggregate Japanese bank lending, but rather reallocated it. Capital constraints during the crisis also induced many Japanese banks to close their overseas branches and switch their charters from international to domestic. This endogenous charter switch reversed the process of foreign direct investment (FDI) for many Japanese banks. Therefore we use the Japanese banking crisis as a natural experiment to test FDI theories and find empirical support for the relative access hypothesis, but not for the industrial organization approach or for the relative wealth hypothesis.

AB - Can regulatory interventions alleviate financial crises? If so, which ones work? We draw inferences from the Japanese banking crisis of the 1990s using a hand-gathered database of bank loans gathered from original sources. Our results indicate that whereas risk-based capital infusions in Japan (similar to those following the 2009 Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (stress tests) in the US) were successful in stimulating aggregate lending by Japanese banks, earlier blanket infusions (comparable to the 2008 Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) in the US) were not effective. Moreover, changes in accounting rules in Japan that revalued bank assets (similar to the relaxation of mark-to-market requirements for banks in the US) did not increase aggregate Japanese bank lending, but rather reallocated it. Capital constraints during the crisis also induced many Japanese banks to close their overseas branches and switch their charters from international to domestic. This endogenous charter switch reversed the process of foreign direct investment (FDI) for many Japanese banks. Therefore we use the Japanese banking crisis as a natural experiment to test FDI theories and find empirical support for the relative access hypothesis, but not for the industrial organization approach or for the relative wealth hypothesis.

KW - accounting changes

KW - bank lending

KW - banking crisis

KW - capital interventions

KW - internalization theory

KW - public capital injections

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052650912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052650912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/jibs.2011.17

DO - 10.1057/jibs.2011.17

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 875

EP - 893

JO - Journal of International Business Studies

JF - Journal of International Business Studies

SN - 0047-2506

IS - 7

ER -