Games policy makers and providers play: Introducing case-mix-based payment to hospital chronic care units in Japan

Naoki Ikegami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Case-mix-based payment was developed for hospital chronic care units in Japan to replace the flat per diem rate and encourage the admission of patients with higher medical acuity and was part of a policy initiative to make the tariff more evidence based. However, although the criteria for grouping patients were developed from a statistical analysis of resource use, the tariff was subsequently set below costs, particularly for the groups with the lowest medical acuity, both because of the prime minister's decision to decrease total health expenditures and because of the health ministry's decision to target the reductions on chronic care units. Providers quickly adapted to the new payment system mainly by reclassifying their patients to higher medical acuity groups. Some hospitals reported high prevalence rates of urinary tract infections and pressure ulcers. The government responded by issuing directives to providers to calculate the prevalence rates and document the care that has been mandated for the patients at risk. However, in order to monitor compliance and to evaluate whether the patient is being billed for the appropriate case-mix group, the government must invest in developing a comprehensive patient-level database and in training staff for making on-site inspections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-380
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Jun

Fingerprint

Diagnosis-Related Groups
Administrative Personnel
Japan
Pressure Ulcer
Patient Admission
Health Expenditures
Urinary Tract Infections
Compliance
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Games policy makers and providers play : Introducing case-mix-based payment to hospital chronic care units in Japan. / Ikegami, Naoki.

In: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 34, No. 3, 06.2009, p. 361-380.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a06e3cc18036490c8fb9c212428b70bf,
title = "Games policy makers and providers play: Introducing case-mix-based payment to hospital chronic care units in Japan",
abstract = "Case-mix-based payment was developed for hospital chronic care units in Japan to replace the flat per diem rate and encourage the admission of patients with higher medical acuity and was part of a policy initiative to make the tariff more evidence based. However, although the criteria for grouping patients were developed from a statistical analysis of resource use, the tariff was subsequently set below costs, particularly for the groups with the lowest medical acuity, both because of the prime minister's decision to decrease total health expenditures and because of the health ministry's decision to target the reductions on chronic care units. Providers quickly adapted to the new payment system mainly by reclassifying their patients to higher medical acuity groups. Some hospitals reported high prevalence rates of urinary tract infections and pressure ulcers. The government responded by issuing directives to providers to calculate the prevalence rates and document the care that has been mandated for the patients at risk. However, in order to monitor compliance and to evaluate whether the patient is being billed for the appropriate case-mix group, the government must invest in developing a comprehensive patient-level database and in training staff for making on-site inspections.",
author = "Naoki Ikegami",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1215/03616878-2009-003",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "361--380",
journal = "Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law",
issn = "0361-6878",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Games policy makers and providers play

T2 - Introducing case-mix-based payment to hospital chronic care units in Japan

AU - Ikegami, Naoki

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Case-mix-based payment was developed for hospital chronic care units in Japan to replace the flat per diem rate and encourage the admission of patients with higher medical acuity and was part of a policy initiative to make the tariff more evidence based. However, although the criteria for grouping patients were developed from a statistical analysis of resource use, the tariff was subsequently set below costs, particularly for the groups with the lowest medical acuity, both because of the prime minister's decision to decrease total health expenditures and because of the health ministry's decision to target the reductions on chronic care units. Providers quickly adapted to the new payment system mainly by reclassifying their patients to higher medical acuity groups. Some hospitals reported high prevalence rates of urinary tract infections and pressure ulcers. The government responded by issuing directives to providers to calculate the prevalence rates and document the care that has been mandated for the patients at risk. However, in order to monitor compliance and to evaluate whether the patient is being billed for the appropriate case-mix group, the government must invest in developing a comprehensive patient-level database and in training staff for making on-site inspections.

AB - Case-mix-based payment was developed for hospital chronic care units in Japan to replace the flat per diem rate and encourage the admission of patients with higher medical acuity and was part of a policy initiative to make the tariff more evidence based. However, although the criteria for grouping patients were developed from a statistical analysis of resource use, the tariff was subsequently set below costs, particularly for the groups with the lowest medical acuity, both because of the prime minister's decision to decrease total health expenditures and because of the health ministry's decision to target the reductions on chronic care units. Providers quickly adapted to the new payment system mainly by reclassifying their patients to higher medical acuity groups. Some hospitals reported high prevalence rates of urinary tract infections and pressure ulcers. The government responded by issuing directives to providers to calculate the prevalence rates and document the care that has been mandated for the patients at risk. However, in order to monitor compliance and to evaluate whether the patient is being billed for the appropriate case-mix group, the government must invest in developing a comprehensive patient-level database and in training staff for making on-site inspections.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66949176969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66949176969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1215/03616878-2009-003

DO - 10.1215/03616878-2009-003

M3 - Article

C2 - 19451408

AN - SCOPUS:66949176969

VL - 34

SP - 361

EP - 380

JO - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

JF - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

SN - 0361-6878

IS - 3

ER -