Gender differences in lateralization of mismatch negativity in dichotic listening tasks

Satoru Ikezawa, Kazuyuki Nakagome, Masaru Mimura, Junko Shinoda, Kenji Itoh, Ikuo Homma, Kunitoshi Kamijima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: With the aim of investigating gender differences in the functional lateralization subserving preattentive processing of language stimuli, we compared auditory mismatch negativities (MMNs) using dichotic listening tasks. Methods: Forty-four healthy volunteers, including 23 males and 21 females, participated in the study. MMNs generated by pure-tone and phonetic stimuli were compared, to check for the existence of language-specific gender differences in lateralization. Both EEG amplitude and scalp current density (SCD) data were analyzed. Results: With phonetic MMNs, EEG findings revealed significantly larger amplitude in females than males, especially in the right hemisphere, while SCD findings revealed left hemisphere dominance and contralateral dominance in males alone. With pure-tone MMNs, no significant gender differences in hemispheric lateralization appeared in either EEG or SCD findings. Conclusion: While males exhibited left-lateralized activation with phonetic MMNs, females exhibited more bilateral activity. Further, the contralateral dominance of the SCD distribution associated with the ear receiving deviant stimuli in males indicated that ipsilateral input as well as interhemispheric transfer across the corpus callosum to the ipsilateral side was more suppressed in males than in females. Significance: The findings of the present study suggest that functional lateralization subserving preattentive detection of phonetic change differs between the genders. These results underscore the significance of considering the gender differences in the study of MMN, especially when phonetic stimulus is adopted. Moreover, they support the view of Voyer and Flight [Voyer, D., Flight, J., 2001. Gender differences in laterality on a dichotic task: the influence of report strategies. Cortex 37, 345-362.] in that the gender difference in hemispheric lateralization of language function is observed in a well-managed-attention condition, which fits the condition adopted in the MMN measurement; subjects are required to focus attention to a distraction task and thereby ignore the phonetic stimuli that elicit MMN.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-50
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Psychophysiology
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Apr
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Phonetics
Scalp
Electroencephalography
Language
Corpus Callosum
Ear
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Dichotic listening task (DLT)
  • Event-related potential (ERP)
  • Gender
  • Mismatch negativity (MMN)
  • Phoneme
  • Scalp current density (SCD)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Gender differences in lateralization of mismatch negativity in dichotic listening tasks. / Ikezawa, Satoru; Nakagome, Kazuyuki; Mimura, Masaru; Shinoda, Junko; Itoh, Kenji; Homma, Ikuo; Kamijima, Kunitoshi.

In: International Journal of Psychophysiology, Vol. 68, No. 1, 04.2008, p. 41-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ikezawa, Satoru ; Nakagome, Kazuyuki ; Mimura, Masaru ; Shinoda, Junko ; Itoh, Kenji ; Homma, Ikuo ; Kamijima, Kunitoshi. / Gender differences in lateralization of mismatch negativity in dichotic listening tasks. In: International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2008 ; Vol. 68, No. 1. pp. 41-50.
@article{dae95cf3cfd248d0a42c0b69bcfc0b2b,
title = "Gender differences in lateralization of mismatch negativity in dichotic listening tasks",
abstract = "Objective: With the aim of investigating gender differences in the functional lateralization subserving preattentive processing of language stimuli, we compared auditory mismatch negativities (MMNs) using dichotic listening tasks. Methods: Forty-four healthy volunteers, including 23 males and 21 females, participated in the study. MMNs generated by pure-tone and phonetic stimuli were compared, to check for the existence of language-specific gender differences in lateralization. Both EEG amplitude and scalp current density (SCD) data were analyzed. Results: With phonetic MMNs, EEG findings revealed significantly larger amplitude in females than males, especially in the right hemisphere, while SCD findings revealed left hemisphere dominance and contralateral dominance in males alone. With pure-tone MMNs, no significant gender differences in hemispheric lateralization appeared in either EEG or SCD findings. Conclusion: While males exhibited left-lateralized activation with phonetic MMNs, females exhibited more bilateral activity. Further, the contralateral dominance of the SCD distribution associated with the ear receiving deviant stimuli in males indicated that ipsilateral input as well as interhemispheric transfer across the corpus callosum to the ipsilateral side was more suppressed in males than in females. Significance: The findings of the present study suggest that functional lateralization subserving preattentive detection of phonetic change differs between the genders. These results underscore the significance of considering the gender differences in the study of MMN, especially when phonetic stimulus is adopted. Moreover, they support the view of Voyer and Flight [Voyer, D., Flight, J., 2001. Gender differences in laterality on a dichotic task: the influence of report strategies. Cortex 37, 345-362.] in that the gender difference in hemispheric lateralization of language function is observed in a well-managed-attention condition, which fits the condition adopted in the MMN measurement; subjects are required to focus attention to a distraction task and thereby ignore the phonetic stimuli that elicit MMN.",
keywords = "Dichotic listening task (DLT), Event-related potential (ERP), Gender, Mismatch negativity (MMN), Phoneme, Scalp current density (SCD)",
author = "Satoru Ikezawa and Kazuyuki Nakagome and Masaru Mimura and Junko Shinoda and Kenji Itoh and Ikuo Homma and Kunitoshi Kamijima",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.01.006",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "41--50",
journal = "International Journal of Psychophysiology",
issn = "0167-8760",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in lateralization of mismatch negativity in dichotic listening tasks

AU - Ikezawa, Satoru

AU - Nakagome, Kazuyuki

AU - Mimura, Masaru

AU - Shinoda, Junko

AU - Itoh, Kenji

AU - Homma, Ikuo

AU - Kamijima, Kunitoshi

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Objective: With the aim of investigating gender differences in the functional lateralization subserving preattentive processing of language stimuli, we compared auditory mismatch negativities (MMNs) using dichotic listening tasks. Methods: Forty-four healthy volunteers, including 23 males and 21 females, participated in the study. MMNs generated by pure-tone and phonetic stimuli were compared, to check for the existence of language-specific gender differences in lateralization. Both EEG amplitude and scalp current density (SCD) data were analyzed. Results: With phonetic MMNs, EEG findings revealed significantly larger amplitude in females than males, especially in the right hemisphere, while SCD findings revealed left hemisphere dominance and contralateral dominance in males alone. With pure-tone MMNs, no significant gender differences in hemispheric lateralization appeared in either EEG or SCD findings. Conclusion: While males exhibited left-lateralized activation with phonetic MMNs, females exhibited more bilateral activity. Further, the contralateral dominance of the SCD distribution associated with the ear receiving deviant stimuli in males indicated that ipsilateral input as well as interhemispheric transfer across the corpus callosum to the ipsilateral side was more suppressed in males than in females. Significance: The findings of the present study suggest that functional lateralization subserving preattentive detection of phonetic change differs between the genders. These results underscore the significance of considering the gender differences in the study of MMN, especially when phonetic stimulus is adopted. Moreover, they support the view of Voyer and Flight [Voyer, D., Flight, J., 2001. Gender differences in laterality on a dichotic task: the influence of report strategies. Cortex 37, 345-362.] in that the gender difference in hemispheric lateralization of language function is observed in a well-managed-attention condition, which fits the condition adopted in the MMN measurement; subjects are required to focus attention to a distraction task and thereby ignore the phonetic stimuli that elicit MMN.

AB - Objective: With the aim of investigating gender differences in the functional lateralization subserving preattentive processing of language stimuli, we compared auditory mismatch negativities (MMNs) using dichotic listening tasks. Methods: Forty-four healthy volunteers, including 23 males and 21 females, participated in the study. MMNs generated by pure-tone and phonetic stimuli were compared, to check for the existence of language-specific gender differences in lateralization. Both EEG amplitude and scalp current density (SCD) data were analyzed. Results: With phonetic MMNs, EEG findings revealed significantly larger amplitude in females than males, especially in the right hemisphere, while SCD findings revealed left hemisphere dominance and contralateral dominance in males alone. With pure-tone MMNs, no significant gender differences in hemispheric lateralization appeared in either EEG or SCD findings. Conclusion: While males exhibited left-lateralized activation with phonetic MMNs, females exhibited more bilateral activity. Further, the contralateral dominance of the SCD distribution associated with the ear receiving deviant stimuli in males indicated that ipsilateral input as well as interhemispheric transfer across the corpus callosum to the ipsilateral side was more suppressed in males than in females. Significance: The findings of the present study suggest that functional lateralization subserving preattentive detection of phonetic change differs between the genders. These results underscore the significance of considering the gender differences in the study of MMN, especially when phonetic stimulus is adopted. Moreover, they support the view of Voyer and Flight [Voyer, D., Flight, J., 2001. Gender differences in laterality on a dichotic task: the influence of report strategies. Cortex 37, 345-362.] in that the gender difference in hemispheric lateralization of language function is observed in a well-managed-attention condition, which fits the condition adopted in the MMN measurement; subjects are required to focus attention to a distraction task and thereby ignore the phonetic stimuli that elicit MMN.

KW - Dichotic listening task (DLT)

KW - Event-related potential (ERP)

KW - Gender

KW - Mismatch negativity (MMN)

KW - Phoneme

KW - Scalp current density (SCD)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40849151860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40849151860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.01.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 18295364

AN - SCOPUS:40849151860

VL - 68

SP - 41

EP - 50

JO - International Journal of Psychophysiology

JF - International Journal of Psychophysiology

SN - 0167-8760

IS - 1

ER -