Good boss, bad boss, workers’ mental health and productivity: Evidence from Japan

Sachiko Kuroda, Isamu Yamamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is widely believed that the relationship between a supervisor and his/her employees greatly affects employees’ well-being and/or productivity. However, only a few papers in the economics literature analyze how supervisors influence employees’ well-being and enhance productivity. This paper uses longitudinal data of employees with information about their immediate bosses’ ability, management skills, and characteristics (such as competency, communication skills, and personality traits) to investigate the influence of supervisors on employees. The main findings are as follows. First, even after controlling for individual-specific fixed effects and other job characteristics, such as those proposed in the job strain model, we find that supervisors’ good communication with staff and competency in managerial tasks significantly improve employees’ mental health. Second, we find that good communication between the boss and his/her staff enhances the latter's productivity and lowers presenteeism. Third, supervisors’ bad communication and low competency increase the probability of quitting. Fourth, good communication partially depends on boss–staff compatibility, which is governed in part by their combined personality traits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-118
Number of pages13
JournalJapan and The World Economy
Volume48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Dec

Keywords

  • Employee retention
  • Mental health
  • Productivity
  • Supervisor competence
  • Supervisors
  • Workplace communication
  • Workplace relationships

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Good boss, bad boss, workers’ mental health and productivity: Evidence from Japan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this