Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: T(8;21) and inv(16) represent different clinical outcomes

Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, Koichi Miyamura, Ritsuro Suzuki, Masaharu Kasai, Atsuo Maruta, Hiroyasu Ogawa, Ryuji Tanosaki, Satoshi Takahashi, Kyuhei Koda, Kazuhiro Yago, Yoshiko Atsuta, Takashi Yoshida, Hisashi Sakamaki, Yoshihisa Kodera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We analyzed 338 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) and inv(16) undergoing stem cell transplantation (SCT) who were registered in the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation database. At 3 years, overall survival (OS) of patients with t(8;21) and inv(16) was 50% and 72%, respectively (P = .002). Although no difference was observed when restricted to allogeneic SCT in first complete remission (CR; 84% and 74%), OS of patients with t(8;21) and inv(16) undergoing allogeneic SCT in second or third CR (45% and 86% at 3 years; P = .008) was different. OS was not different between patients in first CR who received allogeneic SCT and those who received autologous SCT for both t(8;21) AML (84% vs 77%; P= .49) and inv(16) AML (74% vs 59%; P= .86). Patients with inv(16) not in CR did better after allogeneic SCT than those with t(8;21) (70% and 18%; P= .03). Patients with t(8;21) and inv(16) should be managed differently as to the application of SCT. SCT in first CR is not necessarily recommended for inv(16). For t(8;21) patients in first CR, a prospective trial is needed to clarify the significance of autologous SCT and allogeneic SCT over chemotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2096-2103
Number of pages8
JournalBlood
Volume113
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Feb 26
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Immunology
  • Hematology
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: T(8;21) and inv(16) represent different clinical outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this