How can lymphocele development be prevented after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?

Yota Yasumizu, Akira Miyajima, Takahiro Maeda, Toshikazu Takeda, Masanori Hasegawa, Takeo Kosaka, Eiji Kikuchi, Mototsugu Oya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Lymphocele development is the most frequently reported postoperative complication of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). This study evaluated the efficacy of a vessel-sealing device (VSD) for the prevention of lymphocele development. Methods: A total of 120 patients who underwent LRP with PLND were prospectively enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: PLND using a conventional technique (group 1), and PLND performed with VSD (group 2). All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning 1 month postoperatively to evaluate the maximum sectional area of the lymphoceles. Results: Lymphoceles developed in 63 cases (52.5%). One case (0.8%) was symptomatic with infection, and drainage tube placement was required. In the other 62 patients, the lymphoceles developed asymptomatically and were detected by CT scanning. There was no significant difference in the lymphocele development ratio between the two groups. However, when we defined a lymphocele over 1500 mm2 as being a significant size, lymphoceles were present in 16 of 60 patients in group 1 and 4 of 60 patients in group 2. The incidence of significant lymphoceles over 1500 mm2 in the group using VSD was much lower than that of the group without VSD (p<0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that VSD was the only independent factor that had an effect on preventing the development of lymphoceles over 1500 mm2 (p<0.01, odds ratio=4.96). Conclusion: The results indicate that the development of large lymphoceles can be prevented by using VSD in LRP with PLND.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)447-451
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Lymphocele
Prostatectomy
Lymph Node Excision
Equipment and Supplies
Tomography
Drainage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

How can lymphocele development be prevented after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? / Yasumizu, Yota; Miyajima, Akira; Maeda, Takahiro; Takeda, Toshikazu; Hasegawa, Masanori; Kosaka, Takeo; Kikuchi, Eiji; Oya, Mototsugu.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.04.2013, p. 447-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yasumizu, Yota ; Miyajima, Akira ; Maeda, Takahiro ; Takeda, Toshikazu ; Hasegawa, Masanori ; Kosaka, Takeo ; Kikuchi, Eiji ; Oya, Mototsugu. / How can lymphocele development be prevented after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?. In: Journal of Endourology. 2013 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 447-451.
@article{14dd0b297e6c42b7a50d6bbfac1c219f,
title = "How can lymphocele development be prevented after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?",
abstract = "Objectives: Lymphocele development is the most frequently reported postoperative complication of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). This study evaluated the efficacy of a vessel-sealing device (VSD) for the prevention of lymphocele development. Methods: A total of 120 patients who underwent LRP with PLND were prospectively enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: PLND using a conventional technique (group 1), and PLND performed with VSD (group 2). All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning 1 month postoperatively to evaluate the maximum sectional area of the lymphoceles. Results: Lymphoceles developed in 63 cases (52.5{\%}). One case (0.8{\%}) was symptomatic with infection, and drainage tube placement was required. In the other 62 patients, the lymphoceles developed asymptomatically and were detected by CT scanning. There was no significant difference in the lymphocele development ratio between the two groups. However, when we defined a lymphocele over 1500 mm2 as being a significant size, lymphoceles were present in 16 of 60 patients in group 1 and 4 of 60 patients in group 2. The incidence of significant lymphoceles over 1500 mm2 in the group using VSD was much lower than that of the group without VSD (p<0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that VSD was the only independent factor that had an effect on preventing the development of lymphoceles over 1500 mm2 (p<0.01, odds ratio=4.96). Conclusion: The results indicate that the development of large lymphoceles can be prevented by using VSD in LRP with PLND.",
author = "Yota Yasumizu and Akira Miyajima and Takahiro Maeda and Toshikazu Takeda and Masanori Hasegawa and Takeo Kosaka and Eiji Kikuchi and Mototsugu Oya",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2012.0356",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "447--451",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How can lymphocele development be prevented after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?

AU - Yasumizu, Yota

AU - Miyajima, Akira

AU - Maeda, Takahiro

AU - Takeda, Toshikazu

AU - Hasegawa, Masanori

AU - Kosaka, Takeo

AU - Kikuchi, Eiji

AU - Oya, Mototsugu

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - Objectives: Lymphocele development is the most frequently reported postoperative complication of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). This study evaluated the efficacy of a vessel-sealing device (VSD) for the prevention of lymphocele development. Methods: A total of 120 patients who underwent LRP with PLND were prospectively enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: PLND using a conventional technique (group 1), and PLND performed with VSD (group 2). All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning 1 month postoperatively to evaluate the maximum sectional area of the lymphoceles. Results: Lymphoceles developed in 63 cases (52.5%). One case (0.8%) was symptomatic with infection, and drainage tube placement was required. In the other 62 patients, the lymphoceles developed asymptomatically and were detected by CT scanning. There was no significant difference in the lymphocele development ratio between the two groups. However, when we defined a lymphocele over 1500 mm2 as being a significant size, lymphoceles were present in 16 of 60 patients in group 1 and 4 of 60 patients in group 2. The incidence of significant lymphoceles over 1500 mm2 in the group using VSD was much lower than that of the group without VSD (p<0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that VSD was the only independent factor that had an effect on preventing the development of lymphoceles over 1500 mm2 (p<0.01, odds ratio=4.96). Conclusion: The results indicate that the development of large lymphoceles can be prevented by using VSD in LRP with PLND.

AB - Objectives: Lymphocele development is the most frequently reported postoperative complication of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) performed with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). This study evaluated the efficacy of a vessel-sealing device (VSD) for the prevention of lymphocele development. Methods: A total of 120 patients who underwent LRP with PLND were prospectively enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: PLND using a conventional technique (group 1), and PLND performed with VSD (group 2). All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning 1 month postoperatively to evaluate the maximum sectional area of the lymphoceles. Results: Lymphoceles developed in 63 cases (52.5%). One case (0.8%) was symptomatic with infection, and drainage tube placement was required. In the other 62 patients, the lymphoceles developed asymptomatically and were detected by CT scanning. There was no significant difference in the lymphocele development ratio between the two groups. However, when we defined a lymphocele over 1500 mm2 as being a significant size, lymphoceles were present in 16 of 60 patients in group 1 and 4 of 60 patients in group 2. The incidence of significant lymphoceles over 1500 mm2 in the group using VSD was much lower than that of the group without VSD (p<0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that VSD was the only independent factor that had an effect on preventing the development of lymphoceles over 1500 mm2 (p<0.01, odds ratio=4.96). Conclusion: The results indicate that the development of large lymphoceles can be prevented by using VSD in LRP with PLND.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876118663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876118663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2012.0356

DO - 10.1089/end.2012.0356

M3 - Article

C2 - 23030822

AN - SCOPUS:84876118663

VL - 27

SP - 447

EP - 451

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 4

ER -