How do stakeholder groups’ views vary on technology in language learning?

Jonathan Trace, James Dean Brown, Julio Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study examines how technology is perceived by different stakeholder groups in The Language Flagship programs.2 We administered questionnaires to three stakeholder groups: 14 directors, 34 instructors, and 100 learners at a variety of institutions with three goals: (a) to investigate what technologies the directors, instructors, and learners find useful for language instruction; (b) to explore how and to what degree the perceptions of the directors, instructors, and learners agree about technologies they use; and (c) to study how learners’ views vary with regard to the value of various technologies for language learning inside and outside the classroom.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-161
Number of pages20
JournalCALICO Journal
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

stakeholder
director
instructor
language
learning
Group
language instruction
classroom
Stakeholders
Language Acquisition
questionnaire
Instructor
Values

Keywords

  • Language flagship programs
  • Reliability
  • Stakeholder views
  • Survey
  • Technology use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

How do stakeholder groups’ views vary on technology in language learning? / Trace, Jonathan; Brown, James Dean; Rodriguez, Julio.

In: CALICO Journal, Vol. 35, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 142-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trace, Jonathan ; Brown, James Dean ; Rodriguez, Julio. / How do stakeholder groups’ views vary on technology in language learning?. In: CALICO Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 142-161.
@article{a5c5c0e44974413c8ace4b2db1bacc27,
title = "How do stakeholder groups’ views vary on technology in language learning?",
abstract = "This study examines how technology is perceived by different stakeholder groups in The Language Flagship programs.2 We administered questionnaires to three stakeholder groups: 14 directors, 34 instructors, and 100 learners at a variety of institutions with three goals: (a) to investigate what technologies the directors, instructors, and learners find useful for language instruction; (b) to explore how and to what degree the perceptions of the directors, instructors, and learners agree about technologies they use; and (c) to study how learners’ views vary with regard to the value of various technologies for language learning inside and outside the classroom.",
keywords = "Language flagship programs, Reliability, Stakeholder views, Survey, Technology use",
author = "Jonathan Trace and Brown, {James Dean} and Julio Rodriguez",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1558/cj.32211",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "142--161",
journal = "CALICO Journal",
issn = "2056-9017",
publisher = "Equinox Publishing Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do stakeholder groups’ views vary on technology in language learning?

AU - Trace, Jonathan

AU - Brown, James Dean

AU - Rodriguez, Julio

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This study examines how technology is perceived by different stakeholder groups in The Language Flagship programs.2 We administered questionnaires to three stakeholder groups: 14 directors, 34 instructors, and 100 learners at a variety of institutions with three goals: (a) to investigate what technologies the directors, instructors, and learners find useful for language instruction; (b) to explore how and to what degree the perceptions of the directors, instructors, and learners agree about technologies they use; and (c) to study how learners’ views vary with regard to the value of various technologies for language learning inside and outside the classroom.

AB - This study examines how technology is perceived by different stakeholder groups in The Language Flagship programs.2 We administered questionnaires to three stakeholder groups: 14 directors, 34 instructors, and 100 learners at a variety of institutions with three goals: (a) to investigate what technologies the directors, instructors, and learners find useful for language instruction; (b) to explore how and to what degree the perceptions of the directors, instructors, and learners agree about technologies they use; and (c) to study how learners’ views vary with regard to the value of various technologies for language learning inside and outside the classroom.

KW - Language flagship programs

KW - Reliability

KW - Stakeholder views

KW - Survey

KW - Technology use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047088932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047088932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1558/cj.32211

DO - 10.1558/cj.32211

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 142

EP - 161

JO - CALICO Journal

JF - CALICO Journal

SN - 2056-9017

IS - 2

ER -