TY - JOUR
T1 - How effective is it to sequentially switch among Olanzapine, Quetiapine and Risperidone? - A randomized, open-label study of algorithm-based antipsychotic treatment to patients with symptomatic schizophrenia in the real-world clinical setting
AU - Suzuki, Takefumi
AU - Uchida, Hiroyuki
AU - Watanabe, Koichiro
AU - Nomura, Kensuke
AU - Takeuchi, Hiroyoshi
AU - Tomita, Masayuki
AU - Tsunoda, Kenichi
AU - Nio, Shintaro
AU - Den, Ryoske
AU - Manki, Hiroshi
AU - Tanabe, Akira
AU - Yagi, Gohei
AU - Kashima, Haruo
PY - 2007/12/1
Y1 - 2007/12/1
N2 - Rationale: Evidence on sequential trial with atypical antipsychotics has been scarce. Objectives: We conducted an algorithm-based antipsychotic pharmacotherapy. Materials and methods: In this open-label study, patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) were treated with antipsychotic monotherapy, step-by-step, with each trial lasting up to 8 weeks. At baseline, they were highly symptomatic to score more than 54 in the total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS1-7) score. When the posttreatment BPRS score was above 70% of the baseline, they were subsequently treated with another and up to three atypicals. Basically, anticholinergics were prohibited, and only adjunctive allowed was lorazepam. The secondary endpoint was a clinical status good enough to be discharged for 66 inpatients and a successful continuation therapy with the same antipsychotic agent for more than 6 months for 12 outpatients. Results: Three groups of 26 patients each were randomized to Olanzapine, Quetiapine, or Risperidone. Thirty-nine (50%) responded to the first agent (Olanzapine16, Quetiapine9, Risperidone14), and 14 responded to the second. Only two showed response to the third, and 16 failed to respond to all three antipsychotics, with only 7 dropouts. Overall, there were 22 Olanzapine, 14 Quetiapine, and 19 Risperidone responders. Based on the secondary outcome, 20 Olanzapine-treated (average maximum dose, 15.4 mg), 10 Quetiapine-treated (418 mg), and 20 Risperidone-treated (4.10 mg) patients responded. The difference in response as the first choice was significant (p<0.05). Relative doses of those failing to respond were comparable (Olanzapine 18.3 mg, Quetiapine 564 mg, Risperidone5.47 mg). Extrapyramidal symptoms did not change significantly. Conclusions: When the first atypical antipsychotic is inadequate, switching to the second is worth trying, although some remain treatment-refractory. Quetiapine may be inferior to Olanzapine and Risperidone in symptomatic patients.
AB - Rationale: Evidence on sequential trial with atypical antipsychotics has been scarce. Objectives: We conducted an algorithm-based antipsychotic pharmacotherapy. Materials and methods: In this open-label study, patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) were treated with antipsychotic monotherapy, step-by-step, with each trial lasting up to 8 weeks. At baseline, they were highly symptomatic to score more than 54 in the total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS1-7) score. When the posttreatment BPRS score was above 70% of the baseline, they were subsequently treated with another and up to three atypicals. Basically, anticholinergics were prohibited, and only adjunctive allowed was lorazepam. The secondary endpoint was a clinical status good enough to be discharged for 66 inpatients and a successful continuation therapy with the same antipsychotic agent for more than 6 months for 12 outpatients. Results: Three groups of 26 patients each were randomized to Olanzapine, Quetiapine, or Risperidone. Thirty-nine (50%) responded to the first agent (Olanzapine16, Quetiapine9, Risperidone14), and 14 responded to the second. Only two showed response to the third, and 16 failed to respond to all three antipsychotics, with only 7 dropouts. Overall, there were 22 Olanzapine, 14 Quetiapine, and 19 Risperidone responders. Based on the secondary outcome, 20 Olanzapine-treated (average maximum dose, 15.4 mg), 10 Quetiapine-treated (418 mg), and 20 Risperidone-treated (4.10 mg) patients responded. The difference in response as the first choice was significant (p<0.05). Relative doses of those failing to respond were comparable (Olanzapine 18.3 mg, Quetiapine 564 mg, Risperidone5.47 mg). Extrapyramidal symptoms did not change significantly. Conclusions: When the first atypical antipsychotic is inadequate, switching to the second is worth trying, although some remain treatment-refractory. Quetiapine may be inferior to Olanzapine and Risperidone in symptomatic patients.
KW - Algorithm
KW - Antipsychotic
KW - Olanzapine
KW - Open-label randomized clinical trial
KW - Quetiapine
KW - Risperidone
KW - Schizophrenia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35748932330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35748932330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00213-007-0872-2
DO - 10.1007/s00213-007-0872-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 17701027
AN - SCOPUS:35748932330
SN - 0033-3158
VL - 195
SP - 285
EP - 295
JO - Psychopharmacology
JF - Psychopharmacology
IS - 2
ER -