Human sciences and national identity in modern Japan: Who defined the 'Japanese tradition'?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

With the spread of globalisation the relation between national identity and modernisation has become one of the central problems of our time. This paper discusses modern Japan's experiences in defining that relation. Japan was the only Asian state that managed to escape colonisation by Western countries and actually went on to align itself with imperialist powers. Japan modernised itself rapidly and successfully under its central government leadership, which emphasised national traditions and a Western style of modernisation at the same time. The formation of national identity in modern Japan has thus been characterised by such contradictory situations. These situations have had much to do with an ambivalence of identity in the popular Japanese psyche. The perceived notion of a dichotomy between 'Western, white, developed, imperialistic rulers' on the one hand, and 'Eastern, coloured, developing, colonised subjects' on the other does not seem to define an unequivocal position for Japan to occupy in the configuration of states. It is just for this reason that in modern and contemporary Japan intellectuals, policy makers and other opinion leaders openly debate whether Japan should behave like a quasi-Western advanced/imperialistically domineering power or like a prospective leader of the Eastern/Oriental world as opposed to the Western/Occidental. This article seeks to analyse that debate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-251
Number of pages13
JournalChina Report
Volume36
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

human sciences
national identity
modernization
Japan
leadership
globalization
colonization
opinion leader
psyche
human science
ambivalence
intellectual
leader
opinion
central government
world
policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Human sciences and national identity in modern Japan : Who defined the 'Japanese tradition'? / Oguma, Eiji.

In: China Report, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2000, p. 239-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{51f97559985147bd88ec16cad6e10a32,
title = "Human sciences and national identity in modern Japan: Who defined the 'Japanese tradition'?",
abstract = "With the spread of globalisation the relation between national identity and modernisation has become one of the central problems of our time. This paper discusses modern Japan's experiences in defining that relation. Japan was the only Asian state that managed to escape colonisation by Western countries and actually went on to align itself with imperialist powers. Japan modernised itself rapidly and successfully under its central government leadership, which emphasised national traditions and a Western style of modernisation at the same time. The formation of national identity in modern Japan has thus been characterised by such contradictory situations. These situations have had much to do with an ambivalence of identity in the popular Japanese psyche. The perceived notion of a dichotomy between 'Western, white, developed, imperialistic rulers' on the one hand, and 'Eastern, coloured, developing, colonised subjects' on the other does not seem to define an unequivocal position for Japan to occupy in the configuration of states. It is just for this reason that in modern and contemporary Japan intellectuals, policy makers and other opinion leaders openly debate whether Japan should behave like a quasi-Western advanced/imperialistically domineering power or like a prospective leader of the Eastern/Oriental world as opposed to the Western/Occidental. This article seeks to analyse that debate.",
author = "Eiji Oguma",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "239--251",
journal = "China Report",
issn = "0009-4455",
publisher = "Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human sciences and national identity in modern Japan

T2 - Who defined the 'Japanese tradition'?

AU - Oguma, Eiji

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - With the spread of globalisation the relation between national identity and modernisation has become one of the central problems of our time. This paper discusses modern Japan's experiences in defining that relation. Japan was the only Asian state that managed to escape colonisation by Western countries and actually went on to align itself with imperialist powers. Japan modernised itself rapidly and successfully under its central government leadership, which emphasised national traditions and a Western style of modernisation at the same time. The formation of national identity in modern Japan has thus been characterised by such contradictory situations. These situations have had much to do with an ambivalence of identity in the popular Japanese psyche. The perceived notion of a dichotomy between 'Western, white, developed, imperialistic rulers' on the one hand, and 'Eastern, coloured, developing, colonised subjects' on the other does not seem to define an unequivocal position for Japan to occupy in the configuration of states. It is just for this reason that in modern and contemporary Japan intellectuals, policy makers and other opinion leaders openly debate whether Japan should behave like a quasi-Western advanced/imperialistically domineering power or like a prospective leader of the Eastern/Oriental world as opposed to the Western/Occidental. This article seeks to analyse that debate.

AB - With the spread of globalisation the relation between national identity and modernisation has become one of the central problems of our time. This paper discusses modern Japan's experiences in defining that relation. Japan was the only Asian state that managed to escape colonisation by Western countries and actually went on to align itself with imperialist powers. Japan modernised itself rapidly and successfully under its central government leadership, which emphasised national traditions and a Western style of modernisation at the same time. The formation of national identity in modern Japan has thus been characterised by such contradictory situations. These situations have had much to do with an ambivalence of identity in the popular Japanese psyche. The perceived notion of a dichotomy between 'Western, white, developed, imperialistic rulers' on the one hand, and 'Eastern, coloured, developing, colonised subjects' on the other does not seem to define an unequivocal position for Japan to occupy in the configuration of states. It is just for this reason that in modern and contemporary Japan intellectuals, policy makers and other opinion leaders openly debate whether Japan should behave like a quasi-Western advanced/imperialistically domineering power or like a prospective leader of the Eastern/Oriental world as opposed to the Western/Occidental. This article seeks to analyse that debate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033808862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033808862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033808862

VL - 36

SP - 239

EP - 251

JO - China Report

JF - China Report

SN - 0009-4455

IS - 2

ER -