Humans (Homo sapiens) fail to show an inequity effect in an "up-linkage" analog of the monkey inequity test

Yosuke Hachiga, Alan Silberberg, Scott Parker, Takayuki Sakagami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Brosnan and de Waal (Nature 425:297-299, 2003) claimed that if a capuchin sees another capuchin receiving a superior food, she tends to reject an inferior, previously acceptable food. They related this phenomenon to human inequity aversion. This phyletic extension is "down linkage," because nonhuman research is interpreted in terms of human research. The present experiment makes an "up-linkage" test of this claimed connection by attempting to reproduce the capuchin-inequity effect in humans. In Experiment 1's equity condition, a subject and an adjacent confederate each clicked a computer mouse to mark the number "7" from a random numbers table, earning 0.5 yen per mark. In the inequity condition, the confederate's pay rate was twice that of the subject. There was no between-condition difference in quitting times or likelihoods. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 except, before beginning, the subject and confederate clicked a mouse over a rapidly switching message that said they would earn either 0.5 or 1 yen per marked seven. For the equity condition in this rigged test, subject and confederate stopped the message at 0.5 yen, while in the inequity condition, these values were 0.5 and 1 yen, respectively. Now, inequity-condition subjects quit sooner than equity-condition subjects. Experiment 1 found no inequity effect, but Experiment 2 did. These results show that: (a) a sense of control/responsibility may be critical to an inequity effect and (b) the inequity effect putatively present in capuchins cannot be reproduced in an up-linkage human analog of that research, thereby calling this linkage into question. This report exemplifies that up- and down-linkage tests are often requisite to establish commonality of psychological process between nonhuman primates and humans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-367
Number of pages9
JournalAnimal Cognition
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Mar

Fingerprint

Haplorhini
monkeys
equity
experiment
testing
Research
Food
mice
food
Primates
primate
Homo sapiens
effect
test
Psychology

Keywords

  • Down linkage
  • Homo sapiens
  • Human
  • Inequity aversion
  • Up linkage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Humans (Homo sapiens) fail to show an inequity effect in an "up-linkage" analog of the monkey inequity test. / Hachiga, Yosuke; Silberberg, Alan; Parker, Scott; Sakagami, Takayuki.

In: Animal Cognition, Vol. 12, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 359-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hachiga, Yosuke ; Silberberg, Alan ; Parker, Scott ; Sakagami, Takayuki. / Humans (Homo sapiens) fail to show an inequity effect in an "up-linkage" analog of the monkey inequity test. In: Animal Cognition. 2009 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 359-367.
@article{6b626b54b074406280f7aee12197b08e,
title = "Humans (Homo sapiens) fail to show an inequity effect in an {"}up-linkage{"} analog of the monkey inequity test",
abstract = "Brosnan and de Waal (Nature 425:297-299, 2003) claimed that if a capuchin sees another capuchin receiving a superior food, she tends to reject an inferior, previously acceptable food. They related this phenomenon to human inequity aversion. This phyletic extension is {"}down linkage,{"} because nonhuman research is interpreted in terms of human research. The present experiment makes an {"}up-linkage{"} test of this claimed connection by attempting to reproduce the capuchin-inequity effect in humans. In Experiment 1's equity condition, a subject and an adjacent confederate each clicked a computer mouse to mark the number {"}7{"} from a random numbers table, earning 0.5 yen per mark. In the inequity condition, the confederate's pay rate was twice that of the subject. There was no between-condition difference in quitting times or likelihoods. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 except, before beginning, the subject and confederate clicked a mouse over a rapidly switching message that said they would earn either 0.5 or 1 yen per marked seven. For the equity condition in this rigged test, subject and confederate stopped the message at 0.5 yen, while in the inequity condition, these values were 0.5 and 1 yen, respectively. Now, inequity-condition subjects quit sooner than equity-condition subjects. Experiment 1 found no inequity effect, but Experiment 2 did. These results show that: (a) a sense of control/responsibility may be critical to an inequity effect and (b) the inequity effect putatively present in capuchins cannot be reproduced in an up-linkage human analog of that research, thereby calling this linkage into question. This report exemplifies that up- and down-linkage tests are often requisite to establish commonality of psychological process between nonhuman primates and humans.",
keywords = "Down linkage, Homo sapiens, Human, Inequity aversion, Up linkage",
author = "Yosuke Hachiga and Alan Silberberg and Scott Parker and Takayuki Sakagami",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10071-008-0195-7",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "359--367",
journal = "Animal Cognition",
issn = "1435-9448",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Humans (Homo sapiens) fail to show an inequity effect in an "up-linkage" analog of the monkey inequity test

AU - Hachiga, Yosuke

AU - Silberberg, Alan

AU - Parker, Scott

AU - Sakagami, Takayuki

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Brosnan and de Waal (Nature 425:297-299, 2003) claimed that if a capuchin sees another capuchin receiving a superior food, she tends to reject an inferior, previously acceptable food. They related this phenomenon to human inequity aversion. This phyletic extension is "down linkage," because nonhuman research is interpreted in terms of human research. The present experiment makes an "up-linkage" test of this claimed connection by attempting to reproduce the capuchin-inequity effect in humans. In Experiment 1's equity condition, a subject and an adjacent confederate each clicked a computer mouse to mark the number "7" from a random numbers table, earning 0.5 yen per mark. In the inequity condition, the confederate's pay rate was twice that of the subject. There was no between-condition difference in quitting times or likelihoods. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 except, before beginning, the subject and confederate clicked a mouse over a rapidly switching message that said they would earn either 0.5 or 1 yen per marked seven. For the equity condition in this rigged test, subject and confederate stopped the message at 0.5 yen, while in the inequity condition, these values were 0.5 and 1 yen, respectively. Now, inequity-condition subjects quit sooner than equity-condition subjects. Experiment 1 found no inequity effect, but Experiment 2 did. These results show that: (a) a sense of control/responsibility may be critical to an inequity effect and (b) the inequity effect putatively present in capuchins cannot be reproduced in an up-linkage human analog of that research, thereby calling this linkage into question. This report exemplifies that up- and down-linkage tests are often requisite to establish commonality of psychological process between nonhuman primates and humans.

AB - Brosnan and de Waal (Nature 425:297-299, 2003) claimed that if a capuchin sees another capuchin receiving a superior food, she tends to reject an inferior, previously acceptable food. They related this phenomenon to human inequity aversion. This phyletic extension is "down linkage," because nonhuman research is interpreted in terms of human research. The present experiment makes an "up-linkage" test of this claimed connection by attempting to reproduce the capuchin-inequity effect in humans. In Experiment 1's equity condition, a subject and an adjacent confederate each clicked a computer mouse to mark the number "7" from a random numbers table, earning 0.5 yen per mark. In the inequity condition, the confederate's pay rate was twice that of the subject. There was no between-condition difference in quitting times or likelihoods. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 except, before beginning, the subject and confederate clicked a mouse over a rapidly switching message that said they would earn either 0.5 or 1 yen per marked seven. For the equity condition in this rigged test, subject and confederate stopped the message at 0.5 yen, while in the inequity condition, these values were 0.5 and 1 yen, respectively. Now, inequity-condition subjects quit sooner than equity-condition subjects. Experiment 1 found no inequity effect, but Experiment 2 did. These results show that: (a) a sense of control/responsibility may be critical to an inequity effect and (b) the inequity effect putatively present in capuchins cannot be reproduced in an up-linkage human analog of that research, thereby calling this linkage into question. This report exemplifies that up- and down-linkage tests are often requisite to establish commonality of psychological process between nonhuman primates and humans.

KW - Down linkage

KW - Homo sapiens

KW - Human

KW - Inequity aversion

KW - Up linkage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349125394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349125394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10071-008-0195-7

DO - 10.1007/s10071-008-0195-7

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 359

EP - 367

JO - Animal Cognition

JF - Animal Cognition

SN - 1435-9448

IS - 2

ER -