Hydrate formation by water spraying in a methane + ethane + propane gas mixture

An attempt at promoting hydrate formation utilizing large-molecule guest substances for structure-H hydrates

Hideyuki Tsuji, Takehito Kobayashi, Ryo Ohmura, Yasuhiko H. Mori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An experimental study of hydrate formation has been performed, using a simulated natural gas - a mixture of methane, ethane, and propane in a 90:7:3 molar ratio - and a liquid large-molecule guest substance (LMGS), which provides guest molecules to fit into the 512 68 cages of a structure-H hydrate. Except for the use of the gas mixture, the hydrate-forming procedure used in this study was the same as that tested in our previous studies [Ohmura et al., Energy Fuels 2002, 16, 1141-1147; Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424], i.e., spraying liquid water downward through a gas phase onto a liquid-LMGS layer lying on a pool of water under a prescribed temperature-pressure condition (275 K, 2.9 MPa) in a chamber into which the gas mixture was being supplied to compensate for its loss due to hydrate formation. We selected three LMGSs for comparison: tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME), which was found to give the highest rate of hydrate formation when pure methane is used as the guest gas [Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424], 2,2-dimethylbutane (neohexane), and methylcyclohexane (MCH). The rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture was determined to be increased by the presence of any of these LMGSs, compared to the rate observed in the absence of any LMGS. An unexpected fact was found in the rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture plus an LMGS, compared with the rate observed with pure methane plus the same LMGS under the same temperature-pressure condition. That is, the former rate may be much higher or, on the contrary, appreciably lower than the latter rate, depending on the species of the LMGS used. Accordingly, it turns out that the rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture plus neohexane or MCH is higher than that from the same mixture plus TBME, in strong contrast to the nature of hydrate formation from pure methane plus an LMGS that we previously revealed [Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424].

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)869-876
Number of pages8
JournalEnergy and Fuels
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005 May
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Propane
Ethane
Methane
Spraying
Hydrates
Gas mixtures
Molecules
Water
Ethers
Liquids
Gases
Natural gas
Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Fuel Technology

Cite this

Hydrate formation by water spraying in a methane + ethane + propane gas mixture : An attempt at promoting hydrate formation utilizing large-molecule guest substances for structure-H hydrates. / Tsuji, Hideyuki; Kobayashi, Takehito; Ohmura, Ryo; Mori, Yasuhiko H.

In: Energy and Fuels, Vol. 19, No. 3, 05.2005, p. 869-876.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d7b7894ad3bf43409671350be478ed59,
title = "Hydrate formation by water spraying in a methane + ethane + propane gas mixture: An attempt at promoting hydrate formation utilizing large-molecule guest substances for structure-H hydrates",
abstract = "An experimental study of hydrate formation has been performed, using a simulated natural gas - a mixture of methane, ethane, and propane in a 90:7:3 molar ratio - and a liquid large-molecule guest substance (LMGS), which provides guest molecules to fit into the 512 68 cages of a structure-H hydrate. Except for the use of the gas mixture, the hydrate-forming procedure used in this study was the same as that tested in our previous studies [Ohmura et al., Energy Fuels 2002, 16, 1141-1147; Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424], i.e., spraying liquid water downward through a gas phase onto a liquid-LMGS layer lying on a pool of water under a prescribed temperature-pressure condition (275 K, 2.9 MPa) in a chamber into which the gas mixture was being supplied to compensate for its loss due to hydrate formation. We selected three LMGSs for comparison: tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME), which was found to give the highest rate of hydrate formation when pure methane is used as the guest gas [Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424], 2,2-dimethylbutane (neohexane), and methylcyclohexane (MCH). The rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture was determined to be increased by the presence of any of these LMGSs, compared to the rate observed in the absence of any LMGS. An unexpected fact was found in the rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture plus an LMGS, compared with the rate observed with pure methane plus the same LMGS under the same temperature-pressure condition. That is, the former rate may be much higher or, on the contrary, appreciably lower than the latter rate, depending on the species of the LMGS used. Accordingly, it turns out that the rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture plus neohexane or MCH is higher than that from the same mixture plus TBME, in strong contrast to the nature of hydrate formation from pure methane plus an LMGS that we previously revealed [Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424].",
author = "Hideyuki Tsuji and Takehito Kobayashi and Ryo Ohmura and Mori, {Yasuhiko H.}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1021/ef049785a",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "869--876",
journal = "Energy & Fuels",
issn = "0887-0624",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hydrate formation by water spraying in a methane + ethane + propane gas mixture

T2 - An attempt at promoting hydrate formation utilizing large-molecule guest substances for structure-H hydrates

AU - Tsuji, Hideyuki

AU - Kobayashi, Takehito

AU - Ohmura, Ryo

AU - Mori, Yasuhiko H.

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - An experimental study of hydrate formation has been performed, using a simulated natural gas - a mixture of methane, ethane, and propane in a 90:7:3 molar ratio - and a liquid large-molecule guest substance (LMGS), which provides guest molecules to fit into the 512 68 cages of a structure-H hydrate. Except for the use of the gas mixture, the hydrate-forming procedure used in this study was the same as that tested in our previous studies [Ohmura et al., Energy Fuels 2002, 16, 1141-1147; Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424], i.e., spraying liquid water downward through a gas phase onto a liquid-LMGS layer lying on a pool of water under a prescribed temperature-pressure condition (275 K, 2.9 MPa) in a chamber into which the gas mixture was being supplied to compensate for its loss due to hydrate formation. We selected three LMGSs for comparison: tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME), which was found to give the highest rate of hydrate formation when pure methane is used as the guest gas [Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424], 2,2-dimethylbutane (neohexane), and methylcyclohexane (MCH). The rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture was determined to be increased by the presence of any of these LMGSs, compared to the rate observed in the absence of any LMGS. An unexpected fact was found in the rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture plus an LMGS, compared with the rate observed with pure methane plus the same LMGS under the same temperature-pressure condition. That is, the former rate may be much higher or, on the contrary, appreciably lower than the latter rate, depending on the species of the LMGS used. Accordingly, it turns out that the rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture plus neohexane or MCH is higher than that from the same mixture plus TBME, in strong contrast to the nature of hydrate formation from pure methane plus an LMGS that we previously revealed [Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424].

AB - An experimental study of hydrate formation has been performed, using a simulated natural gas - a mixture of methane, ethane, and propane in a 90:7:3 molar ratio - and a liquid large-molecule guest substance (LMGS), which provides guest molecules to fit into the 512 68 cages of a structure-H hydrate. Except for the use of the gas mixture, the hydrate-forming procedure used in this study was the same as that tested in our previous studies [Ohmura et al., Energy Fuels 2002, 16, 1141-1147; Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424], i.e., spraying liquid water downward through a gas phase onto a liquid-LMGS layer lying on a pool of water under a prescribed temperature-pressure condition (275 K, 2.9 MPa) in a chamber into which the gas mixture was being supplied to compensate for its loss due to hydrate formation. We selected three LMGSs for comparison: tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME), which was found to give the highest rate of hydrate formation when pure methane is used as the guest gas [Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424], 2,2-dimethylbutane (neohexane), and methylcyclohexane (MCH). The rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture was determined to be increased by the presence of any of these LMGSs, compared to the rate observed in the absence of any LMGS. An unexpected fact was found in the rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture plus an LMGS, compared with the rate observed with pure methane plus the same LMGS under the same temperature-pressure condition. That is, the former rate may be much higher or, on the contrary, appreciably lower than the latter rate, depending on the species of the LMGS used. Accordingly, it turns out that the rate of hydrate formation from the gas mixture plus neohexane or MCH is higher than that from the same mixture plus TBME, in strong contrast to the nature of hydrate formation from pure methane plus an LMGS that we previously revealed [Tsuji et al., Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 418-424].

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20544450532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20544450532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/ef049785a

DO - 10.1021/ef049785a

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 869

EP - 876

JO - Energy & Fuels

JF - Energy & Fuels

SN - 0887-0624

IS - 3

ER -