TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying Septic Shock Populations Benefitting From Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion
T2 - A Prospective Cohort Study Incorporating a Restricted Cubic Spline Regression Model
AU - Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) Focused Outcomes Research in Emergency Care in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Sepsis and Trauma (FORECAST) Study Group
AU - Nakata, Hidekazu
AU - Yamakawa, Kazuma
AU - Kabata, Daijiro
AU - Umemura, Yutaka
AU - Ogura, Hiroshi
AU - Gando, Satoshi
AU - Shintani, Ayumi
AU - Shiraishi, Atsushi
AU - Saitoh, Daizoh
AU - Fujishima, Seitaro
AU - Mayumi, Toshihiko
AU - Kushimoto, Shigeki
AU - Abe, Toshikazu
AU - Shiino, Yasukazu
AU - Nakada, Taka Aki
AU - Tarui, Takehiko
AU - Hifumi, Toru
AU - Otomo, Yasuhiro
AU - Okamoto, Kohji
AU - Kotani, Joji
AU - Sakamoto, Yuichiro
AU - Sasaki, Junichi
AU - Shiraishi, Shin Ichiro
AU - Takuma, Kiyotsugu
AU - Tsuruta, Ryosuke
AU - Hagiwara, Akiyoshi
AU - Masuno, Tomohiko
AU - Takeyama, Naoshi
AU - Yamashita, Norio
AU - Ikeda, Hiroto
AU - Ueyama, Masashi
AU - Fujimi, Satoshi
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) is an adjuvant therapy for sepsis or septic shock that removes circulating endotoxin. However, PMX-HP has seldom achieved expectations in randomized trials targeting nonspecific overall sepsis patients. If used in an optimal population, PMX-HP may be beneficial. This study aimed to identify the optimal population for PMX-HP in patients with septic shock. METHODS: We used a prospective nationwide cohort targeting consecutive adult patients with severe sepsis (Sepsis-2) in 59 intensive care units in Japan. Associations between PMX-HP therapy and in-hospital mortality were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. To identify best targets for PMX-HP, we developed a non-linear restricted cubic spline model including two-way interaction term (treatment × Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score/Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score) and three-way interaction term (treatment × age × each score). RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 741 sepsis patients (92 received PMX-HP, 625 did not). Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for the covariates suggested no association between PMX-HP therapy and improved mortality overall. Effect modification of PMX-HP by APACHE II score was statistically significant (P for interaction = 0.189) but non-significant for SOFA score (P for interaction = 0.413). Three-way interaction analysis revealed suppressed risk hazard in the PMX-HP group versus control group only in septic shock patients with high age and in the most severe subset of both scores, whereas increased risk hazard was observed in those with high age but in the lower severity subset of both scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that although PMX-HP did not reduce in-hospital mortality among overall septic shock patients, it may benefit a limited population with high age and higher disease severity.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) is an adjuvant therapy for sepsis or septic shock that removes circulating endotoxin. However, PMX-HP has seldom achieved expectations in randomized trials targeting nonspecific overall sepsis patients. If used in an optimal population, PMX-HP may be beneficial. This study aimed to identify the optimal population for PMX-HP in patients with septic shock. METHODS: We used a prospective nationwide cohort targeting consecutive adult patients with severe sepsis (Sepsis-2) in 59 intensive care units in Japan. Associations between PMX-HP therapy and in-hospital mortality were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. To identify best targets for PMX-HP, we developed a non-linear restricted cubic spline model including two-way interaction term (treatment × Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score/Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score) and three-way interaction term (treatment × age × each score). RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 741 sepsis patients (92 received PMX-HP, 625 did not). Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for the covariates suggested no association between PMX-HP therapy and improved mortality overall. Effect modification of PMX-HP by APACHE II score was statistically significant (P for interaction = 0.189) but non-significant for SOFA score (P for interaction = 0.413). Three-way interaction analysis revealed suppressed risk hazard in the PMX-HP group versus control group only in septic shock patients with high age and in the most severe subset of both scores, whereas increased risk hazard was observed in those with high age but in the lower severity subset of both scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that although PMX-HP did not reduce in-hospital mortality among overall septic shock patients, it may benefit a limited population with high age and higher disease severity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089672020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089672020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001533
DO - 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001533
M3 - Article
C2 - 32195922
AN - SCOPUS:85089672020
SN - 1073-2322
VL - 54
SP - 667
EP - 674
JO - Shock
JF - Shock
IS - 5
ER -